7
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Archive Link from archive.today

Original link from The Washington Post

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

As a Satanist, I'll enjoy using this.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

As a Christian, I fully support you being able to take off Wednesdays from work. Or whenever the heck your day of rest is.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

The article is behind a paywall so I can’t read it all. Does it sound like the law has potential to be abused? Religions are not formally defined because that’d open a whole another can of worms. Can someone claim rummaging through a cash register - their religious ritual?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Removed as redundant since OP edited post with an archive link.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Replied with the full text.

Does it sound like the law has potential to be abused?

the court clarified Thursday that an undue hardship is “shown when a burden is substantial in the overall context of an employer’s business.”

Sounds like it doesn't matter how much other employees are burdened, just the business overall. That said, yes, the ruling has lots of potential for abuse.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

World News

23039 readers
9 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS