I watched the whole trial. The verdict was definitely just, but her lawyer didn’t do her any favors. At one point, in a moment of frustration, her lawyer exclaimed ‘I’m going to kill myself’, at a trial for a mother of a kid who killed a bunch of kids.

She ‘opened the door’ to a whole bunch of evidence that had previously been ruled inadmissible, including the defendants infidelity and the entire text communications between the defendant and her husband.

She said “I’m sorry” about a thousand times, which I am convinced was an intentional strategy to associate the defense with being sorry.

They weren’t supposed to use the shooters name but she used it three times in her opening statement.

Most of her objections were not valid legal objections, but just argument.

The whole thing was a train wreck, I actually feel bad for her (the attorney not the defendant).

Shame it didn’t go this way for Rittenhouse.

This is good news and it’ll be better news when I see a father getting nailed for giving his sons guns

As a 2A Advocate / Gun Guy all I can say is GOOD. Parents who do this deserve to held legally responsible.

Waiting for conservatives to tell us the 2A protects a child's right to own a gun. Come on, they've earned it guise!

Thumbnail looks like Mitch McConnell has reconsidered his stance on drag.

This was the case where the parents decided to be tried separately right? I wonder if we’ll see both end up in the same sentence.

Justice done, but ultimately this doesn't solve anything.

Gun manufacturers should take note, they are one step away from fault now.