top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 62 points 2 years ago (22 children)

You know, I don't see the problem here. Though the language is currently problematic, it's a valid message.

I disagree with the language being problematic, since the dictionary definition of "retard" is literally to be held back or to hold back. Persons who are mentally held back are by definition being mentally retarded. It's a valid clinical term.

It really is a shame that "retarded" became a word of disparagement and slang for those who are stupid. A word which is widely regarded as insulting more than anything else.

The other thing that saddens me is that while we have associations for people who are clearly and significantly mentally handicapped, when it comes to simple mental health for everyone else, it's often regarded as a sign of weakness. Any attempt to seek help for any mental issues is generally looked down upon. There's a large number of people who not only would benefit from mental health services but need them to lead fulfilling lives. So many people struggle with disorders that aren't as obvious and have no facilities to seek help or even a diagnosis to understand themselves; at least not without significant personal resources at their disposal, which most lack.

That whole side of humanity generally just needs a small push to get to their potential, and they are often denied a chance to get that push. Either from economic barriers, or social stigma, or other reasons. We actively harm the potential of the race, in my opinion, by allowing those people to continue to struggle with disorders they don't understand that may be able to be solved with a fairly simple prescription, or changes in their behaviors.

Given how massive this issue is and how easily it could be solved (by providing very basic mental health services to everyone who needs them), I'm continually disappointed in humanity as a whole that this is allowed to continue. This message, no matter what Barbara might say, or want to have happen with this message, it is one that should be repeated, perhaps with more modern terms, and such institutions as what is promoted here, should be maintained. There's no shame in needing help; regardless if you are someone with a mental disorder, or full mental disability, those services should be made available.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Though the language is currently problematic, it's a valid message.

    Back in the 80s, many people lamented how the word gay had been "ruined" for them.

    From that time, there was a sketch by Toronto's comedy troupe The Kids In The Hall of a little old lady lamenting how the word f-gg#t had been ruined for her. Back in her day, a f-gg#t was a bundle of dry sticks, "on cold winter nights we'd huddle by the fireplace and we'd throw another f-gg#t in the fire", she says with a sigh.

    Then she goes on to say how she used to like fisting - calls it a needlepoint technique - until her friends told her what that word meant now.
    She speculates that the word rambler might now mean something filthy, too. All those lovely old words, now tucked away, can't use them anymore.

    EDIT: I am using a certain word in historical context here, got censored, so I edited it to see if it now flies under the bots' radar.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    As far as it becoming a word of disparagement and slang for those who are stupid - thats basically what constantly happens. A new word comes out and eventually it is used to insult people and then another new word starts being used.

    For an example:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    It really is a shame that "retarded" became a word of disparagement and slang for those who are stupid. A word which is widely regarded as insulting more than anything else.

    "Moron" was literally something doctors used to describe certain patients once too. Any clinical term used to describe someone of low intelligence (putting aside the difficulties in making that determination in any universal sense) will inevitably be used as a pejorative/insult. It can't be stopped.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yep. In the 90s when I grew up, the politically correct term was "mentally challenged", which eventually started being used as an insult. The current term is "special needs" and already I've seen it used as an insult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I agree 100%, if I may add: Society has also little place for "stupid" people. I mean people with a smaller IQ but who are not special needs. I have a friends who really, with all the best of support, is just not smart. Who has barely managed to finish school and couldn't understand stuff in their vocational training (I live in Germany, that's the typical route to go). She is working in a cafeteria now, serving food. She has this job for years and years now, she's well adapted there. It's not a special needs job, it is just the kind of job you get if you don't have a (vocational) degree to show for.

    And there is no actual problem with that. She has friends and a husband and a fulfilling life. She's happy. She does her job well. You can argue that school has failed her but the truth is no matter what you do, she'd never become a lawyer or an accountant. That's just not in the cards for her. And that's ok. But what's not is that she is struggling with money. Because this is where society fails her. Assuming that you can always do better, have a "higher" job, if you just try hard enough. Like, no. We all have limitations. I couldn't be a doctor because I faint when someone tells me about injuries. That's ok, too. She won't have a career or manage the canteen, she's content, she doesn't want that either, but she will probably have to work until she dies because her retirement won't be enough. This isn't fair.

    I've seen this with tutoring school children too. Some kids just won't make it to university and some won't even finish school. Or they will but that's just it then. And the sad part is not that they won't have an amazing education but that despite holding down a job they will just never be able to make it to a point in which they will not struggle financially.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I agree, there will always be differences in intellectual capacity. It's not a problem as people are needed of every capacity for every type of job to do the work. There's nothing wrong with someone being of low IQ and taking a job they're capable of fully grasping. Often, I find that people in positions that suit them often do better at those jobs than people ill suited to their position.

    For me it's really not about how smart you are or what you're intellectually capable of, it's about how well you do at the job you have. Knowing the nuances of that position and how to handle situations in the context of the job, which makes you a valuable member of society.

    It is shameful that people of low IQ are used as an offending stereotype for society as a whole. Low IQ doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things; especially when taken in context with someone's utility to society. Some of the most important and helpful people are those with limited intellectual capacity, or holding jobs well suited to people with limited IQ. As an extreme example, say someone who is low IQ works on a farm growing food. That farmer does a good job because they're all suited to the kind of work they do. This allows more intellectually capable people pursue advancements that can benefit everyone including the farmer. Whether designing vehicles or electronics/computers, or even keeping complex systems running... Everyone is important. People of all IQs and walks of life and everything.

    I would argue that people of low IQ are the bedrock of modern society. The people who handle the day to day service needs of the general population. They provide, and maintain the framework in which we all live. Without them, or someone to do those jobs, I believe that society would collapse.

    Of course, I continue to believe that everyone of all walks of life should continue to make efforts to improve upon themselves; gain more knowledge and "move up in the world" as they are capable... But no matter what, we still need people who will grow, cook and serve food. We still need people to stock shelves and drive trucks. We still need people to do so much of the work that makes our lives possible at all. Not everyone can be an Einstein. While the notable inventors and thinkers get their names in history books, that progress is built on the backs of hundreds or thousands of "menial labor" workers that helped get us to the point where people of high IQ can spend their lives working on these problems and finding solutions the rest of us couldn't possibly have thought of.

    We're all a part of the society in which we live, if we're doing our best to contribute to that society and provide meaningful progress to future generations, then everyone is important. Not just those with fame and notoriety in the history books.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Is that the woman with the house that nobody’s supposed to see?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    You mean this 2002 Kenneth & Gabrielle Adelman, California Coastal Records Project, photograph that she attempted to suppress in 2003?

    Is that the photograph you were referring to? Then yes, you're absolutely not supposed to see this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • In line with the wishes of Madam Streisand I have looked at everything in this picture except for the center, which is where I assume the house to be. One of you (Only one of you) may look at the house without disturbing the net number of time sthis house has been seen.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Do you think she'll sue to have this one taken down too, inadvertently raising awareness of the increasing rate of children are born with special needs?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)
    1. Invent a new name for an undesirable condition
    2. People start using this name as an insult
    3. Get offended that an insult is used to refer to people with said condition
    4. Go back to 1
  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    In the UK people of a certain age remember Joey being an insult.

    This is because Blue Peter, a popular kids show, had a segment on a heavily disabled man called Joey Deacon. Between him and his friends at the care home, they had written a small book, at a few words a day. This, they thought, would endear the disabled to the nation's children, who would see that just because somebody cannot speak or move, they could still achieve something.

    The next day, every playground was awash with kids calling each other Joey and grunting at each other.

    Blue Peter really did not know us at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Except it is not said condition. Because the condition was a misdiagnosis.

    "Hysteria" was once a diagnosis for overly-emotional women. It was a misdiagnosis too. And now calling people hysterical is often viewed by those people as offensive. Even if they are being overly-emotional.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Language changes, Barbra though she never changes and I read the quote in her voice.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 2 years ago (8 children)
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

    I'm sure the ad is real, although I don't know it for a fact. It is still a real organization, though the name changed 30ish years ago. It was between 10 and 15 years ago that Obama signed Rosa's law, changing the words in federal law to "mental disability" or "an individual with an intellectual disability".

    Remember, there was a time when that wasn't a pejorative term. It was a diagnosis. The way people used the word to "other" those with disabilities is what made it pejorative. Prior to that it was a neutral term.

    A lot of terms used to make fun of intelligence used to be a diagnosis, like idiot and imbecile. That's really neither here nor there, but I find it interesting how mental medical diagnoses become insults but physical ones don't. I've never had someone yell "you play baseball like a paraplegic!" at me.

    Edit: I was wrong and have been corrected. See below.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Spazz is a pejorative term derived from spasticity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I just looked up the history of ARC (previously NARC). It started in the 30's when Retarded was the medical term for intellectual disability. Now that Retarded is a pejorative they changed their name to ARC (no longer an acronym) in the 90's.

    Looks pretty heinous today but when this ran it was probably an acceptable use of the word.

    I can't speak to the text of the PSA though, I got lost in the Wiki rabbit hole trying to figure that out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Retardation is a technical term as well. An engine retarder is one that slows the compression to ease the performance. I don't think it was intended to be malicious, but it ended up that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    Yeah for sure. Retard is fine in a lot of instances but using it as an insult to refer to people is the pajorative, and it makes sense that an organization catering to intellectual disabilities would want to distance themselves. Isn't language fun. I am still reeling from the new slang the kids invented.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    This has been up 6 hours and some lemming hasn't shouted "REEEEE ABLEIST SLURRRRR!" from the rooftops? Color me surprised.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›