this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
385 points (89.2% liked)

Lemmy Be Wholesome

6575 readers
305 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Be Wholesome. This is the polar opposite of LemmeShitpost. Here you can post wholesome memes, palate cleanser and good vibes.

The home to heal your soul. No bleak-posting!

Rules:


1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. No NSFW Content


-Content shouldn't be NSFW

-Refrain from posting triggering content, if the content might be triggering try putting it behind NSFW tags.


7. Content should be Wholesome, we accept cute cats, kittens, puppies, dogs and anything, everything that restores your faith in humanity!


Content that isn't wholesome will be removed.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Mildly Infuriating

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Jokes

7.Credible Defense

...

Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 140 points 8 months ago (17 children)

Sorry to poo poo the wholesomeness, but you should not be selling your possessions to buy an engagement ring. You should be buying a ring that is within your income to afford. An engagement ring is definitely one of those "it's the thought that counts" purchases. If it is not, that is a massive red flag.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 8 months ago (2 children)

But they had a PS4, wanted an engagement ring instead and sold the PS4 for money they could use to buy the ring. Seems... fine to me? You don't have to hold on to everything you own.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Completely agree. Plus, with a wife, who has time for Playstation anyway

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

With a wife you get an extra controller silly

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My girlfriend passes my progress in any game I introduce her to. She's twice the gamer I am :/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

My 4yo can kick my ass in Smash. What have I created? What have I become???

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

You can play with her station

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You don't have to spend that much for a ring if just wanting a ring is your concern. You can get a ring for like 20$ on amazon if having one is all you care about. If he didn't want the PS4 anymore why buy him another one?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You don't have to even get a ring but he clearly wanted one and could afford the one he wanted by selling his PS4. Again, seems fine to me.

If he didn't want the PS4 anymore why buy him another one?

Maybe he liked playing it but wanted to get her a ring more? Seems simple enough to me...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

A bias I've noticed on a lot of social media is that a lot of people tend to assume video games are either 0 importance or heavy importance in people's lives. Like if he gave up his console, it must mean that he sacrificed his dearest hobby for her and that's why it's bad. In reality it's just as likely it was something he used a couple times a month and gave up for something more important.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean you shouldn't sell your car, but selling what amounts to a toy, in order to buy a bit nicer ring than you can afford, is a good way to get some extra cash AND show that you're in it to win it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Emm no. It's an empty gesture in a system that hijacked it to say "more expensive more love". Don't buy an expensive ring, period.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is an item that might be used every day for the rest of your life (even beyond your life). You wouldn't spring for a slightly better one? Moissanite exists, as do lab diamonds if you want to go cheaper and look the same.

Definitely pay more than $500 for something that may outlast you. If you or your spouse doesn't like the ring because it's cheap, that's a worse deal that spending thousands on something that you actually use.

Imagine a ring that costs $10K that is worn every day for 10 years. It looks amazing. $2.74 per time worn. Now imagine a ring that costs $500 that's only worn once a month for sentimental value. Over 10 years that's $4.17 per time worn. It's more expensive because you don't like wearing it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, I wouldn't buy a ring at all, since rings are a cashgrab.

I can also imagine the 10k invested into something actually useful instead of a futile gesture. Imagine being pragmatic and not buying a trinket by selling your other belongings.

There is no reason to buy a 10k ring.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

All luxury items are a "cashgrab". You don't have to buy any of them. If you wouldn't buy one at all, why are you commenting? I don't wear a watch, but I also don't go on threads about watches and say "I wouldn't buy a watch at all".

Forget about money, I think you need to invest your time better.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

I'm commenting because I can, and you can't make me not comment. I can voice my opinion, you can do with it what you will, other than prevent me from saying stuff

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

I mean it can be both right? Maybe the ring he could afford isn't the ring he wanted to give. And he regarded the ring higher than his own PS4. Could have been fully his own decision.

Now if she DEMANDED a ring of a certain value, of course... But I think we can look for the wholesome explanation here.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Yeah lol. I have two that I use and both together cost about as much as a single game. One is literally just steel.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Hell....skip the whole weird church and contract junk and just don't get married. Save the money completely. Have a BBQ with friends. Marriage does nothing but waste money

[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or get married at a courthouse for the tax breaks without all the overpriced bullshit of a "traditional" wedding

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

People usually still get rings at those.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I agree on the whole, but marriage was something from life I wanted to experience. Treating my friends and family to a great party was worth it. Although, mine was probably ten times cheaper than most.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

i mean you can have parties for basically free, the point is that the standard wedding is made to milk people for money.

if you want a wedding just hit up a catering company and head to some park or something, and get a second hand wedding dress or just a reasonable normal dress.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Marriage is more a contract than it is a religious thing

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Agreed, I actually got my fiancee this bell as an engagement bell. She's really into cats and loves it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

When you marry a Namazu

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

can also double as an engagement ring too

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

In stable economies, for above poors.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Little did she know that PS5 has been out for years

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Should’ve got a PS5 to account for interest

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

She must be an exec at EA, holding back features on PS5 because it's too new

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

The guy could've then sold that for a wedding ring

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

is it wholesome to make unwise financial decisions to conform to arbitrary social standards? feels more wholesome to enjoy playing together on the playstation instead, you can get really pretty oxidized titanium rings for basically nothing.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago

Maybe they just liked the ring? They're adults. If they wanna follow arbitrary social standards, that's their choice

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That was financially wise of her. Getting an expensive wedding ring and waiting for the PS to drop in price.
But to be honest, it's wholesome that they both equally seems caring for each other, but not that they ruin themselves for luxury rings.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

This is called shorting and she's now a mod of /r/wallstreetbets

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is such a strange photo to attach to a tweet, though. The one on the left shows the husband's right hand in a unnatural position with the thumb all messed up. In the photo on the right, both hands look normal, resting on the game console box. His face is utterly blank. Could this be an AI generated tweet or post?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

In the left photo he is holding his phone in his right hand close to his face, taking a picture of the gifts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Also who writes "happy birthday husband" in a public tweet?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

She couldn’t afford a ps5?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

PS4 had PT on it, thats how he afforded the engagement ring.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Do they still make PS4s? I remember buying my PS3 about a year after it came out and the store clerk looked at me like I was insane when I asked if they had any in stock. They did have one - which I bought, but he said "if you want the latest playstation buy it when it comes out, this PS3 is a dinosaur, nobody is wanting PS3s anymore." I would have bought one earlier, I just didn't have the funds at that time.

Now I'm feeling guilty about not buying a PS5 which is already obsolete and yesterday's technology. Even though there's no games on PS5 I'm interested in. Honestly -- and I am really opening myself up here - my fave console is still the PS2, I love the games for it and still play them often.

load more comments
view more: next ›