I thought I understood, but I still have Beehaw content in my feed, so I guess I don't understand after all... Can someone dumb it down for me?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 3 years ago

We need a c/FederatedDrama write up.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    wait why did they defederate us?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    lemmy.world and and sh.itjust.works have a lot of users and it seems like beehaw was getting too much content from them. There are apparently only 4 people running beehaw and they felt they couldn't moderate all the content and felt like it was a vulnerability that lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works just let anyone sign up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    participate the effort to create an alternative to Reddit people leave Reddit to join the alternative be unable to handle the influx of people trying to use the alternative to a website with millions of users

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    Their reasons are much more selfish than that. They insist on only having 4 moderators while never scaling up, and they don't like how federation allows users from other instances to post on their instance because it disrupts their rigid ideal community vibe. According to their suggestions on "improving moderation tooling", the ideal federation setup is that their users can post on other instances, but other instances' users can't post on theirs, so they can save time on moderation work. The moderation work of other instance admins for their users doesn't matter, clearly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago

    I read their post explaining the decision, but it seems like it is at odds with itself. If your goal is to create a safe space, why are you using a federated service? I understand you have the option to defederate, but at that point why didn't you just setup a standalone message board. It just feels that their use case doesn't fit the system.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Isn't this like... the whole point of the Federated Universe? The mods do Beehaw want their server to be a "safe space". They're perfectly within their rights to restrict who can post in their own community. But you, the user, are not in any way beholden to their whims, and can make an account on any other Lemmy instance, or create your own and make it as restricted or unrestricted as you please.

    It seems logical to me that the creators of a safe space for marginalized communities would restrict their community from the internet at large because people on the Internet feel emboldened by anonymity to attack others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Yes, the point of the Fediverse is that everyone is free to associate with groups they choose. There is nothing wrong with creating instances that are very isolated. What Beehaw wants with the "improving moderation tooling", however, is a safe space where the network is restricted from them, but they still have full access to the rest of the network. That suggestion is what I was calling selfish, because this way their users would be parasiting off the content and moderation of other instances while giving nothing back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I still don't see how this is not in line with the ideals and values of the Fediverse. If other instances don't want to take on the extra moderation you are referring to, they can simplify defederate from Beehaw, too.

    Every instance can do whatever it wants, and if other instances don't like that then they can both go their own ways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I wouldn't call it selfish. They want tools for more granular control on their instance. That's perfectly fine. If they limit who can post or comment based on the instance they are from. The other instances are perfectly free to limit their users as well in response or for their own arbitrary reasons.

    There seems to be a distinct lack of controls across lemmy as a whole. The only option for them is all or nothing at the moment.

    I think the big take away is for users to think about what instance they create their accounts and communities on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Ya I think a big part of the pushback is that I think a lot of people chose their "home" instance based on the guidance provided by the instance admins and then lost access to a lot of the network because of other decisions made by those same admins

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    Thank you, you put in words my thoughts exactly. Not all communities need to have the same rules as the others, not all need to be as open as others and that is more than fine.
    Homogenization of the internet led us to a handful of corporations dominating social media websites and that is awful.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The community vibe is definitely a huge motivation. They want to be able to control the sort of people on their instance which they can't do if the mass user bases from lemmy.world etc. that are (relatively) neutral have access. It's a shame because they had some good communities established.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Is that right? That seems not in keeping with the spirit of the thing. If they don't want to moderate large communities, how about you don't host large communities at all. Maybe that's what they're after, but they had seeded the space with a lot of logical communities that people were going to click on from the "find federated communities" pages from around the fverse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 3 years ago*

    It seems like they really just want the well made, actively developed message boards software, but they dont truly want the federation stuff. They wanted (and got) the user boost from all the reddit nonsense (and no, I do not believe that four people personally, meaningfully vetted thousands of users in the course of a couple days) and now they want to wall themselves off.

  • source
  • parent
  • According to their suggestions on β€œimproving moderation tooling”, the ideal federation setup is that their users can post on other instances, but other instances’ users can’t post on theirs, so they can save time on moderation work.

    So basically they want to have their cake and eat it too. How lovely.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [+] 21 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    The only simple way I know about is checking the instance status of each individual server. Beyond that it's building apps to collect the info for you.

    At the bottom of every page of a Lemmy instance you'll find the "Instances" link, which takes you to a list of who are connected and blocked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Lemmy.world still has all the content it pulled from beehaw before they defederated, but they won't sync anymore, so you won't see new beehaw updates, and they won't see any updates from lemmy.world

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (17 children)

    Was there a reason why they defederated??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Apparently the 4 admins are having trouble dealing with the influx of new users, so they defederated from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works because their open registration policies are giving them the most problems.

    https://beehaw.org/post/567170

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Ok I'm one of the new users and it looks like I've commented on communities hosted there maybe a half dozen times. I guess I'm part of the problem πŸ˜”

    But I'm a little unclear about the role an admin plays on an instance? Are they actually taking on mod responsibilities, in which case I can certainly understand how 4 would be totally swamped?

    I guess in my head I sort of imagined each community has its own mod(s) and the admins would only step in as a kind of "supreme court" if some dispute gets out of hand? I've probably got this totally wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago

    Yeah that's what I was wondering. I'm just going off what they said. I know they don't allow communities to be created except what they did themselves, so maybe they are taking on all the mod responsibilities?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (15 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    So when an instance is blocked, it means users on the blocked instance will no longer be able to see that instance’s content. For example, beehaw.org has now blocked lemmy.world. However with the way federation works, the content from beehaw is cached on lemmy.world servers. So you can only see what has already been cached; there will be no updated content on any existing cache.

    Edit: here's a recent post from kbin.social going into further detail on how federation works.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Wrong.

    beehaw blocked lemmy.world. lemmy.world has not blocked beehaw. lemmy.world will continue to get content from beehaw. beehaw has stopped all content from lemmy.world from comming to beehaw.

    lemmy.world accounts can still see new post and comments from beehaw but no comments will be responded to by behaw users because they cannot see lemmy.world post or ocmments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • From what I understand, if you, using a lemmy.world account, post something on a beehaw instance, only people from lemmy.world would be able to see it.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    So I guess the next question is do we now recreate beehaw communities that were popular and fragment the community, or do we make accounts on a smaller instance that has access to beehaw.org and lemmy.world? I’m not about to start logging in and out of multiple accounts because beehaw mods are getting butt hurt…

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I think this post explains it pretty well.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    On reddit you could get banned from many subs for posting in a sub that its moderators didn't like. And in the fediverse it's exactly the same. So what's the point? I'm here, because I hoped that it won't be like reddit.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 10 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Man, This is so cool, Not related to the topic but im able to see yall talk about lemmy from lemmy instances while im on kbin

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)

    They are taking their ball and going home

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    You have Beehaw content that was synced before they defederated.

    Federation isn't accessing remote content on remote instances, it's content mirroring. So, anything that was mirrored before Beehaw defederated will stay exactly where it is. You just won't see any updates to it.

    At least, not from Beehaw.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί