Browser save-as-type to the rescue.
Firefox extension: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/image-converter/
Chrome too, but find it yourself if you are still using that.
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
437 points (100.0% liked)
Memes @ Reddthat
990 readers
1 users here now
The Memes community. Where Memes matter the most.
We abide by Reddthat's Instance Rules & the Lemmy Code of Conduct. By interacting here you agree to these terms.
Rules
- No NSFW content
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Webp is actually a decent format, it's just that a certain desktop OS used by roughly 70% of people chooses to not support it
decent format
poorly supported
Hmm. I know what you mean but wide support is like 90% of the usefulness for a general image format.
its kinda like linux, its great and everybody loves it
but only 2% of people use it
as lemmy shows those 2% realllllly like it.
load more comments
(8 replies)
many android applications including Facebook messenger don't support it either
Lemmy.world's android app doesn't fully support it. I frequently get broken link image and never get animation. I know it can work because the same posts work in the Thundarr Lemmy app.
load more comments
(1 replies)
*It isn't as decent when you look at it's raw facts but for the web it's a step into future.
*Now behold of avif!
! please can we just get jxl for web finally...? !<
load more comments
(1 replies)
Tl;Dr: PNG but better.
No.
It losslessly compressed ~150GB of my PNGs to ~75GB, so I'd say it's definitely better space-wise.
It's absolutely not loseless at any kind of quality past web content
The WebP format supports fully lossless compression in addition to lossy compression. I used the lossless mode for my images.
load more comments
(14 replies)
load more comments
(19 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
I really like WEBP.
It supports transparency, animations, and compression, and seems to look really good even with very strong compression. It's a shame that, despite it coming out 13 years ago, it's still barely supported by so much software.
load more comments
(7 replies)
99% of the images I save are used as a desktop background at work for a day or two.
.webp doesn't work as a windows desktop background.....
I end up just screenshoting and cropping.
.webp is great until you need to use anything that wasn't built with it in mind. Lots of stuff just never bothered adding support.
It annoys me that Firefox won't autoplay animated webp, at least ones in Lemmy posts, unless I open a whole new tab just for the fucking .webp
load more comments
(3 replies)
Web pee
There is an easy fix though. Just open the image in Gimp and then export it as a jpeg or PNG.
Spending up to a minute or more opening a huge-ass program to just convert one single image doesn't seem exactly elegant to me. Maybe it's easy but it's also a bit of a pain.
load more comments
(2 replies)
convert image.webp image.png in your terminal should do the trick, if you're on Linux
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Where's the problem?
Webp images can be a pain in the ass to work with because many programs don't support them.
Which programs don't support webp exactly?
In my case, Illustrator and XD, which I use a lot. One of the best features of XD is the ability to drag and drop images into placeholders but I can't do that with webp. In Illustrator, importing a webp file crashes the app.
Illustrator supports webp for a couple years now.
Must be on my end then. I tried opening one just now and it still crashes.
load more comments
(1 replies)
For a program costing US$22.99/mo crashing and not accepting webp, which is so abundant, is extrem. Especially crashing for such an expensive program is not acceptable.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Open with gimp -> export as -> export as png -> export
You over estimate the amount of effort I'm willing to put into saving memes
load more comments
(2 replies)
I disabled webp in firefox and still had to get a secondary image converter extension to get around this format, I wish I could opt out forever.
Legitimately amazing compression for gifs, but isn't supported for shit outside of the browser it comes in, be it editing images or upload to older online galleries. Good luck to anyone who just renames the file format to png/jpeg, now you have no idea what's actually the correct format when you need it... I used to think that was a good idea, until I faced programs that would not run 'renamed' formats whatsoever.
What were you thinking with the whole extension renaming ruse?!
But anyway, I've done that too.
I think it's a matter of time. MP3s were not support by many tools when it first came out.
You know when you were a kid and the was a toy in a clamshell of plastic that was super hard to tear?
It's a bit like that, but with less chance of slicing your thumb open
Why are people converting .webp to png with a program!? Just rename the file with the .png extension and it'll work. Try it.
view more: next ›