this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023

35 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27027 readers

1956 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What are some channels or creators that do science/engineering experiments? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Inspired by this post:

If we're reviving everything then start with Mythbusters

What are some modern channels that do similar stuff? If episodes area available, what are older shows that might work?

Some more general examples that come to mind:

SloMoGuys - mostly seeing things in slow motion to see how it works
How Ridiculous - For a younger audience, but it fits
Mark Rober - Engineered stuff

Not quite related, but maybe:

top 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Tom Stanton - STEM -he's been doing air powered planes lately
DIY Perks - Projects - He does all kinds of neat projects that aren't necessarily sciencey
Integza - STEM - He's been discovering better was he can build rocket thrusters *Colinfurze - Engineering - He does wacky things
Steve Mould - Science - He gives explanations over intriguing phenomena with amazing physical models
Practical Engineering - Engineering - He explains why our infrastructure is the way it is

I'm certain there are more; these are just the ones I watch.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

BPS.space, RCtestflight, Project Air, and Wintergatan do some sciencey engineering stuff

There are also a ton of great CS YouTubers including Sebastian Lague, Acerola, AngeTheGreat, b2studios and Pezzza’s work

Some of the more rigorous scientific channels include Nighthawkinlight, CNC kitchen, RCtestflight, Wintergatan, and Major Hardware

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Steve Mould

Tom Scott

Stuff Made Here

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Not a science experiment person but i like Dr Becky and PBS space time for space youtubers. They go really in depth and i love it.

Also Nileblue and his other channel Nilered are great for chenistry experiments.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

PBS Space Time is the real heavyweight of science youtube, bit of a one-stop-shop for more advanced science questions.

Problem is you can't jump straight in. It's proper education, so it builds on itself in layers, and you need the previous layers to be able to work with future ones. You need at least a fluent HS level of physics and algebra to be able to run with them, and if you go there for the answer to one question, you might find yourself going back down a tree of their previous vids just to pick up that important background/foundational stuff that is necessary to see how it all fits together.

Otherwise it's science-flavored word salad.

Nile, on the other hand, is immediately accessible. He's doing hands-on laboratory stuff, and explaining particularly important basics as he goes. Chemistry background helps, but is not actually necessary. Love that dude, he's great.

Also, if you like Dr Becky, check out Sabine Hossenfelder.

Also, props to SEA, who imo strikes the best balance of everyone in the space science community between accessibility and scientific accuracy. As opposed to someone like Astrum, who occasionally will be inaccurate, but is more science entertainment anyway.

Lastly, going to throw out Journey to the Microcosmos' microscopy vids. Big and far away is cool, but small and right on top of you is kinda cool too. They're basically nature documentaries, just ... bacteria instead of lions and zebras and shit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Alright, I'll just dump:

PBS Spacetime, for answers to roughly-university-level physics and foundational science: https://youtube.com/@pbsspacetime

The Science Asylum, for quicker, more concise answers to specific physics questions in Bill Nye style: https://youtube.com/@ScienceAsylum

Sabine Hossenfelder, for science news updates: https://youtube.com/@SabineHossenfelder

Dr Becky, for astronomy/astrophysics news: https://youtube.com/@DrBecky

SEA, for more accessible astronomy/astrophysics explainers: https://youtube.com/@sea_space

Scott Manley, for space exploration/engineering analysis: https://youtube.com/@scottmanley

NileRed for hands-on chemistry: https://youtube.com/@NileRed

Journey to the Microcosmos for microscope science: https://youtube.com/@journeytomicro

Institute of Human Anatomy for physiology, with a lean towards medicine: https://youtube.com/@TheAnatomyLab

Lastly, the Godfather himself, Mark Rober for mechanical/electrical engineering, and how to use ultra-fine glitter and fart spray to fight package thieves: https://youtube.com/@MarkRober

You changed the world, Mark.

Once you start digging through enough of these, the algorithm will pick up that you like good science stuff, and will start helping you out a little. There's thousands of them now, professionals, working fully within their areas of demonstrated expertise. I recommend googling their full names and checking their background before trusting them yourself. This is like, off the top of my head, though, just some of my favorites for evening background audio.

There's also whole worlds of math youtubers in-line with all the above, that are outside the scope of this question.

I'll edit if I think of more. I probably will.

edit: I do realize several of these, such as the astrophysicists, are not experimental. I'm digging for more experiment-oriented types, but neither my memory nor my algorithm is helping.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

I'll throw in Steve Mould

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are there any that are not on youtube? I'm trying to degoogle my life, and youtube is on the hardest ones to find alternatives to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You'll probably never find a 1:1 replacement for youtube, but Nebula has a lot of similar content on it for a reasonable price.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I mostly don't need a 1:1 replacement, just great content. There is more great content added in a day than there are hours - even if I watch on 2x speed. Note that I reduced this great content as opposed to the junk and there is still more than enough. Just give me some of that content and I'm happy. (junk vs great is in the eye of the beholder)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Smarter Every Day is the big one for me.

For explosives there Ordnance Lab, they have the paperwork for all kinds of stuff the Mythbusters couldn't get their hands on.

Modern History TV for medieval life. Tod's Workshop for pre modern weapons. Grand Thumb for firearms. Townsends for colonial/revolutionary american food and lifestyle. Primative Technology. Miniminuteman, archaeology.

Chemistry YouTube: Explosions and Fire, for an Australian synthesizing explosives in a shed. Nilered for interesting chemistry in an actual lab. Various others.

How to Cook That debunking cooking myths and tiktocs.

Donut Media, car stuff.

Visual effects and debunking: Captain Disillusion Corridor Crew

Law: Legal Eagle Steve Lehto

Special mentions: Lindybeige Sabine Hossenfelder

Start looking into this and you get loads more in your recommended. For all the low effort R-ddit and meme channels there are loads of people working on high quality content. Learning YouTube is vast once you get into it. Nebula is pretty good too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Cody's Lab. He has been building a Mars base in the Utah desert for a couple of years now, including not being able to work on stuff without a "space suit" or Robo Cody. He also does a lot of very interesting science experiments involving chemistry, engineering, and geology.

Styropyro. Very hard to describe, seriously just watch one of his videos, your mind may be blown (by lasers or very large battery arrays, who knows!)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Followup question 2: What are some questions you have that you want to see done by someone? (In case this prompts someone to think of a channel)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

How the monetization of content, even in cases where the content is good and I enjoy the creator, leads to a loss of freedoms online by contributing to laws and tools used to force other creators out of spaces and restrict access to content the was open and free in the past like archival sites. Contributing to a worsening of online services and experience for all over time. And as the generation that are early adopters we are doing a disservice to future generations by not shoring up the things that make being online great and instead allowing it to become a billboard like a NASCAR fender while "look how this bridge is created, like and subscribe" plays in the background

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Followup question 1: What are some MythBusters episodes that you recommend everyone try?