205
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

An outbreak of lead poisonings in children, tied to contaminated cinnamon applesauce pouches, illustrates the gaps in how heavy metals in foods are regulated.

Despite strong efforts to limit lead exposure from sources like paint and gasoline, the U.S. government doesn’t broadly limit lead levels in food, a blind spot that’s become all the more glaring, experts say, as cases of lead poisonings in young children linked to contaminated cinnamon applesauce continue to mount.

As of Tuesday, lead poisoning had been reported in at least 65 children, all younger than 6, who ate pouches of now-recalled cinnamon apple puree and cinnamon applesauce, up from 57 cases two weeks ago, according to the Food and Drug Administration.

Children under the age of 6 are most vulnerable to lead poisoning, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says. The heavy metal can lead to developmental problems, damage to the brain and nervous system, and problems with learning, behavior, hearing and speech. Lead exposure can lead to lower IQ and underperformance in school, according to the CDC.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 50 points 2 years ago

Answer: because we don't like to limit the potential for profits.

[-] [email protected] 42 points 2 years ago

And people with brain damage from lead poisoning continue to vote for politicians who will not limit the potential for profits.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

And with higher lead levels we have fuller prisons. It's just trickle down economics. A literal cradle to the prison pipeline.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Same as it ever was.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 2 years ago

Because the FDA is underfunded and understaffed.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

By design. Because the capitalists captured their own regulators and government that was supposed to protect everyone else from their insatiable greed warping society against its own interests to maximize private shareholder profit.

There's more economic incentive as a career in fighting the FDA than fighting with the FDA. Our entire civilization rewards selfish malevolence and punishes empathetic benevolence.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago

Lead in baby food leads to more conservatives. Conservatives need to keep their numbers up.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

Meanwhile EU set new, lower limits for lead in 2021.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Tangential question: at what point, in the manufacture of applesauce, would lead even come in the vicinity of the product. I just don't see how unless it was deliberately added.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Lead is in soil and water. Stuff grown in that soil and water will contain some amount of it.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Yep. The FDA advises people not to cook with hot water from the tap, for example, because of the risk of lead exposure. I don't think most people even know it's a problem.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Hi, non American here. How is the hot tap different to the cold tap?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

Apparently the hot water leaches lead out of fittings and solder joints much faster than cold water does

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Something about hot water dissolving lead from the pipes. We have a lot of lead pipes.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Although true, that has nothing to do with high levels of lead in food products. It's a totally separate issue.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I didn’t know that was the reason until just now. I always assumed it was an energy saving tip

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah but not enough to be recalled.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

How much of your food is tested?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Nah. High lead levels aren't a "super rare, could only be intentional" type occurrence. We just don't test that much until people get sick. Babies and toddlers get sick a whole lot faster than adults. You might be eating things with higher than acceptable amounts of lead and not realize for decades.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Okay so I don't understand what you're arguing or why. Seems like you're saying there's high levels of lead in lots of food, but we don't know because we don't test... so how do you know if we don't test?

I'm saying that levels of lead found in the cinnamon applesauce probably don't occur just by chance, cuz they were so high they were causing symptoms in children which triggered a recall. That suggests there was more lead present than what naturally occurs. So where'd it come from? The FDA is pretty sure it's the cinnamon that came from Ecuador, so here are some possibilities:

  1. The cinnamon was grown in a lead mine or something and had extremely high lead levels. Kind of doubt that.

  2. Introduced during processing by machinery containing lead in its metal components. Possible.

  3. Deliberately added to the cinnamon to alter its color or increase its weight. Also possible.

I'm guessing it's either #2 or #3.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I'm arguing this premise is incorrect:

I'm saying that levels of lead found in the cinnamon applesauce probably don't occur just by chance, cuz they were so high they were causing symptoms in children which triggered a recall. That suggests there was more lead present than what naturally occurs.

And going all conspiracy theorist on this is irresponsible until FDA has a chance to investigate.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

If you think I'm acting like a conspiracy theorist, then you're cognitively impaired or trolling. Stop eating lead laced food?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Do you think theorizing that a conspiracy took place isn't a conspiracy theory? Unless you think just one person secretly added lead.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

lol. Okay candybrie, I'm going to break down what could have happened, again.

  1. the cinnamon used in the applesauce was somehow grown in soil that contained a ridiculous amount of lead. No conspiracy, just human error.

  2. Equipment used in the processing of the cinnamon contained lead. That lead accidentally got into the processed cinnamon. No conspiracy, just human error.

  3. Lead was deliberately added to the cinnamon to either increase its weight or alter its color. That's a thing that happens. Possibly one person, maybe more were involved, but it's not what most people would consider a conspiracy. It's just people being lazy, unscrupulous, or greedy.

Don't take my word for it, here's a link to a peer reviewed paper measuring lead levels in spices:

Adulteration of spices can occur at any point along the supply chain due to the intentional or inadvertent addition of lead. Lead may be added as a coloring agent, or to add weight for products sold by weight, or it can be introduced because of poor processing equipment; the presence of lead in air, dust, or soil where food is grown or processed can also contribute toward contamination. In addition, poor regulatory controls in some countries can further impact the safety of food supplies.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

A conspiracy is a two or more people agreeing to commit a crime and then committing that crime. That's all. It's not super deep. Number 3 sounds at very least to be fraud.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

So ummm, you should probably see this: https://lemmy.world/post/9621277

[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago

oh boy all food has lead in it

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Since no one seems to have read the article, and the summary doesn't answer the headline, I gave it a skim. Basically, regulations on lead in food are a work in progress, but progress tends to be slow when there isn't much political pressure behind it, and that pressure tends to only come after something goes wrong.

The big problem is threading the gap between what is technically possible with existing technology and infrastructure, and what the limits would ideally be from a public health perspective. Everyone agrees there should be a limit, but finding the best number for each food product is a complicated process.

it can be difficult to agree on recommended lead levels because fruits, vegetables and whole grains all contain varying amounts of the heavy metal.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Why just baby food? Why aren't there lead limits in all food?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Children can get messed up a lot more easily than adults can, since children are going through rapid development.

After about 25, there's almost no real development aside from things like learning and exercise, so there's less that can go wrong if adults eat certain contaminants.

There are a lot of unpleasant contaminants whose legal limit is not 0...

[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago

Did you respond to a question about baby food, with an age of 25?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

There should be eventually but young children are particularly susceptible so it's a logical place to start

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Bah, what's next with you people, limits on the amount of plutonium?

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
205 points (98.6% liked)

News

30241 readers
3894 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS