this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
48 points (98.0% liked)

Formula 1

9051 readers
112 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 21-23 Nov
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

[Tobi Gruener] Initial test runs on a wet track at Silverstone using "spray guards" have not been successful. Mick Schumacher was running the prototype "wet weather package" on a Mercedes. A McLaren driven by Oscar Piastri was used as a reference car.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Translated article below:

Formula 1 has a rain problem. At high speeds, the cars whirl up too much water, which means that the pursuers drive in the field like in a smoke screen. Forward visibility is severely impaired. The risk of accidents increases.

The introduction of wider tires in the 2017 season had increased the spray. The problem has obviously increased since last season due to the ground effect racing cars. Because the cars radiate the water upwards.

Those responsible for the premier class are feverishly looking for a solution to reduce the spray in order to improve visibility again and to make rain racing possible again without danger. Fenders over the rear wheels could come to the rescue here. They should prevent the water displaced by the 405 millimeter wide rear tires from splashing upwards and backwards.

Formula 1 carried out a first test in the week after the British GP. At Silverstone, Mercedes and McLaren committed to take part. Reserve driver Mick Schumacher piloted the Silver Arrow with fenders over the rear wheels. Mercedes had built the first prototypes of the so-called "Spray Guards" after the FIA ​​had run simulations, and then asked the ten teams for suggestions for improvement.

Oscar Piastri steered the McLaren around the wet racetrack. The MCL60 was without fenders to provide a comparison. The result: The rain test with the covers was a failure. There was still too much spray. And according to observers, the aesthetics of the fenders left a lot to be desired. The world association FIA has not yet published pictures of the test.

The regulators are in a bind. They experimented at Silverstone with fenders that didn't completely cover the rear tires. These could not really contain the water and, on top of that, distributed it in different directions.

None of the modifications brought satisfactory results. "We are not yet where we want to be," says FIA circles. On the other hand, it was just the first trial run. With the experience gained, better solutions could emerge in the future.

Of course, covers that are as wide as the tires themselves would also be possible. But that creates additional problems with aerodynamics, because the load automatically increases the larger the area is. Aerodynamics in Formula 1 is a game of every millimeter.

The engineers want to avoid any disruptive factor that could negatively affect the airflow. There are quite a few in the paddock who are therefore pessimistic about the future of wet racing – especially on high-speed tracks.

Should further rain tests still bring a breakthrough, the fenders would be included as a standard part in the regulations. Each team would have to build them themselves according to uniform specifications. The race management would decide under which conditions they would be used. An example: In the event of heavy rain with poor visibility, everyone would be obliged to deploy the "Spray Guards". Even if things improved, they stayed with the car until the end of the race.

The FIA ​​said in a statement: "The first phase of field testing for the wet weather package was completed with a version of the mudguard fitted to a Mercedes. A McLaren was used as a reference vehicle to evaluate the concept and provide information for future development of the project to obtain." It continues: "This on-track test provided valuable CFD correlation data as well as good driver feedback. Both will be used to refine both the methodology and the design for phase 2 of this project."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think most of the spray is from the ground effect, no?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I reckon so. Still, full wets can displace up to 85 liters/second (at 300 kph), so reducing tire spray would probably have helped some.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What was unsuccessful about the test?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

From the reading of the article, the design they tried didn't reduce the spray enough and was pretty ugly looking. They could do bigger fenders but then they're likely to run into aero problems so they're still trying to figure out something

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

With the way climate change is going, almost every race will have rain. There's no need to prototype a "wet weather package"