all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 2 years ago

Just stopping by to say fuck tankies. Ok bye.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Calling people “tankies” calls forth an imagine of old men yelling at everyone to stay off their lawn.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (9 children)

    It's easy to make a list of all communists countries that turned fascists and massacred people. You don't do that with capitalists because there are simply too many, everywhere, in about all of history.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's almost like the main problem with both authoritarian communism and authoritarian capitalism might be the authoritarianism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago*

    Just that most captialist counties are democracies and all communist countries are authoritarian because communism and it's limiting of rights doesn't go without a dictatorship and the murder of millions of innocent people 😇

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Just as a true socialist country has never existed, a true capitalist country has never existed. Economies are always mixed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If only we could imagine what a truly capitalist country would look like in the future! Like, I don't know, we call this genra something like cyberpunk?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It would be 100% with capitalist as well.

    As DarthBueller@lemmy.world less succinctly put it. Capitalism is barely a few hundred years old. It's barely existed a fraction of human history. It's barely older than many of the original socialist ideals. Let alone all of history. Markets and currency predate capitalism and socialism by millennia. And neither has claim to them. Despite both making use of them.

    That said fuck leninists. Actual communists are pretty chill though. But leninists and capitalists are a threat to everyone. Including themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    can't wait to see the hexbear response to this one

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    You don't have to wait you can just go look at them whenever you want.

    https://hexbear.net/post/1070892

    They won't be showing up here, this is a lemmy.world community and they are defederated afaik.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    NNNOOOO!!! HOW DARE YOU UN-WHITEWASH LENIN!!!! NOOOO!!! Tankies tried SO HARD to make Makhno disappear like Trotsky! You LIBERAL AMERICANS!!! REEEEEE!!!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Here is Makhno in 1920 after agreeing to a temporary ceasefire:

    "Military hostilities between the Makhnovist revolutionary insurgents and the Red Army have ceased. Misunderstandings, vagueness and inaccuracies have grown up around this truce: it is said that Makhno has repented of his anti-Bolshevik acts, that he has recognized the soviet authorities, etc. How are we to understand, what construction are we to place upon this peace agreement?

    What is very clear already is that no intercourse of ideas, and no collaboration with the soviet authorities and no formal recognition of these has been or can be possible. We have always been irreconcilable enemies, at the level of ideas, of the party of the Bolshevik-communists.

    We have never acknowledged any authorities and in the present instance we cannot acknowledge the soviet authorities. So again we remind and yet again we emphasize that, whether deliberately or through misapprehension, there must be no confusion of military intercourse in the wake of the danger threatening the revolution with any crossing-over, 'fusion' or recognition of the soviet authorities, which cannot have been and cannot ever be the case."

    — quoted in Nestor Makhno: Anarchy's Cossack, a pro-Makhno book

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Just because people are enemies doesn't mean they can have a truce. Who broke that truce?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    it appears to have been mutually understood

    After the Seige of Perekop, Makhno's aide-de-camp Grigori Vassilevsky, announced the agreement was over:

    That's the end for the agreement! Take my word for it, within one week the Bolsheviks are going to come down on us like a ton of bricks!

    — Grigori Vassilevsky, quoted in the same book

  • source
  • parent