this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
22 points (89.3% liked)

Political Memes

5413 readers
2791 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

“Also, there is no way that the gun was a part of this crime! Guns don’t kill people. Only the mentally unstable people we goad into mass shootings with the weapons and ammo we sell them kill people.”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Pfft these kids don't even know what kind of guns they're being killed with...

-conservatives

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your cries for help are meaningless if you can't tell the difference smh

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They could call it a "fnorplgleek" for all I care.

Until they figure out how to prevent any and all fnorplgleeks from having the ability to injure, main, or kill another human being when the fnorplgleek operator wishes to harm you unlawfully, they can expend 100% of their thinkbox time figuring out how to do so. Like, pin their wetware CPU to working out a solution. Interconnect them Borg style.

If the response is "well no, not like that" then we recognize that it's a compromise that continues to put victims in front of said fnorplgleek operators.

brb getting a "Down with fnorplgleeks" t-shirt made

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you wouldn't care if the legislation was written to ban anything that has the potential to kill?

Guns, cars, knives, bleach, rope all could fall into that category. See how words have specific definitions and actually matter quite a bit? Especially when the law is concerned. Why do you think there's different categories of homicide? Do you think manslaughter and 1st degree murder should carry the same penalty?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only one is made to kill. All others have other uses

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So large jacked up trucks have a use? Butterfly knives and swords have practical uses? What about cars with more than 200 hp? Not like you can do 120mph anywhere legally, so why have them? Or alcohol, more people are killed 10 fold via drunk drivers than all rifles combined... sounds like alcohol should go back to prohibition era and the gov. poisons it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I take it you're for walkable cities then?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely and mass transit. Trains should have been worked heavily into long distance travel in our country. Even though I'm a petrolhead, I still don't understand why we neutered our mass transit and civilian walkable infrastructure...might have helped with our obesity epidemic.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Good to hear we can agree on that

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point of the right to bear arms is to have some defense against an oppressive government if needed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes it is.

Historians could only "uncover" this reason because it's buried under the actual reasons. All the rationale behind the constitutional amendments was highly documented at the time, public, and easily accessed and referenced.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean including the highly documented rationale that historian uncovered?

By the way, do you really think you could defeat the U.S. military with your gun collection? Even if you and a bunch of buddies got together?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

As to your second paragraph, yep, yes, sure. We got beat by a bunch of illiterate desert goat rapists and jungle Asians. Just need to outlast the political will of the oligopoly

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I know so many people who think they are helping by critiquing like this when they are not. And also expect a “thank you” for their destructive distraction. If there were a hell I hope they are the first to burn or freeze in it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you've ever seen the difference a machine gun and a semi auto does to a body you'd be picky about it too

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you saw how dead the 4 year old is either way, you wouldn't be.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There a lot of 4 year olds getting killed in school shootings?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

No you are right. Toddlers shoot their family instead