A former BioWare employee says that EA's new management wasn't on board with the developer's inclusiveness.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 295 points 1 week ago* (49 children)

“You can fuck the aliens but only if they’re straight.”

Fucking Saudi Arabian govt.

  • source
  • hideshow 49 child comments
  • load more comments (49 replies)
    [–] 191 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    The anonymous employee mentioned a specific case where the developers were asked to remove a specific flag from a presentation video for "looking too much like the LGBTQIA+ flag," in order "not to offend."

    God what a bunch of snowflakes.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    For example, The Sims 2 physical edition cover shows different Sims in several poses, including a couple kissing and an alien. In Saudi Arabia, the cover art was completely modified to feature a handful of dull-looking male Sims standing emotionless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 80 points 1 week ago (6 children)
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    lol like why would you even want to be in the entertainment business. Like making entertaining fun stuff? Just to make it all dull as fuck? Do you really need to buy a brand to do that? Couldn’t you just hire some devs and make your own shitty brand? Unless you were actively trying to destroy culture you don’t like…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 82 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    But the worries that lgbtq sims players expressed about this takeover are still totally unfounded right?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

    Sims players despite being thought of as casuals (and most definitely are) have been the canary in the coal mine for so much bullshit from EA.

    They even brought back the widely hated and transparently cynical micro transactions from Sims 3 into Sims 4, get this, over 10 years after the launch of the game. These games are so indicative of so many aspects of the industry and trends and how audiences deal with changes in a way that I think a lot of people don’t realize.

    Sims 1 was oozing with personality and is a pretty straightforward satire of capitalism 4 KiDz!! while 4 is not only beyond sterile but has pretty much gotten worse over 12 years especially when they reworked it into a free game. Yes I’m complaining about the themes and writing of a simulation dollhouse game mainly played by children. Children deserve good writing too

    Edit: they used to call their Monopoly money “SimPoints” and now it’s called “Moolah”. Yeah. Yeah.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 69 points 1 week ago (15 children)

    The issue isn't just about a texture or a flag—it's the corporate censorship and what it signals. If management is already stepping in to scrub a presentation video to avoid "offending" corporate masters, it makes you wonder what kind of creative compromises are happening behind closed doors during actual game development.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 54 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    For context for any viewers who are wondering why @thingsiplay@lemmy.ml deleted his posts, he was saying this:

    • that the Pride flag has no symbolic meaning, but is "just a flag"
    • that because the Pride Flag is not significant to @thingsiplay@lemmy.ml, it therefore has no meaning (which they repeated numerous times)
    • that the removal of a symbol does not symbolize the removal of the thing that symbol symbolizes
    • that gay people are given equal welcome in bars instead of being discriminated against
    • that any change without impact on the gameplay has no meaning
    • that censorship before the release of the game is not censorship and has no meaning

    If you were wondering why he has so many downvotes, that is why. :)

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 49 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    developers were asked to remove a specific flag from a presentation video for "looking too much like the LGBTQIA+ flag," in order "not to offend."

    Well, they failed. Because that offends me.

    But why buy a studio known for inclusive storytelling, presumably to profit from it, and then kill the thing they're known for? Or was this an investment in culture war?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Is that the game where you can have sex with an insect alien and a rock monster? Sure glad they removed a flag or people would think sex between humans was normal 🤡

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 42 points 1 week ago* (14 children)

    i mean they were bought by Saudi Arabia(96%) and that country is not too fond of LGBTQ

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Fuck EA.

    They allow insane amounts of racism. Like, thousands of n word mentions a week at least. I report this shit weekly and they reject me.

    They don't fucking care, and the game I play is a Star Wars game. So, Disney doesn't care about the racism, either.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 31 points 1 week ago
    [–] 29 points 1 week ago*

    I fucking knew it, hijabs for everyone! The game is better dead than mangled, I say.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Yeah, it's Saudi Arabia, they are Islamic and not quite as permissive as USA.

    There's no pride parade in Saudi Arabia or any Islamic state. You keep your head down and keep it to yourself or you get thrown off a roof.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 19 points 1 week ago

    Yet another reason why we need to move the world off of its oil dependency.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 week ago*

    Of course it wasn't. They're owned by SA now. Used to jokingly refer to them as Evil Assholes, but they seem to want to really earn that moniker.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›