Linux

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 point 1 hour ago

Rejection of tools and disclosure of tool usage are two different things.

That being said, there's much more faith in those contributing to the Linux kernel than in any other organization I've met.

parent

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 33 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

This ain't gonna end well.

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

According to the article imecth linked to in another comment it was already essentially meaningless.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] refalo@programming.dev 5 points 6 hours ago* (1 child)

I think the hivemind has already spoken, they are taking this to mean that the kernel is now vibe-coded and people are actively jumping ship.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -2 points 5 hours ago

The hivemind, aka a social media bubble.

Pretty sure most users of Linux are not part of that and are going to keep on using Linux.

Edit: looks like the Fediverse instance this community is running on is using tainted code by the definitions used in your link. Will this ship also be jumped?

parent

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Is it for the kernel or for the kernel documentation?

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] imecth@fedia.io 4 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

The former, there's this freenode article that elaborates as for why this is happening.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social -2 points 5 hours ago

Damn... That article makes it sound a whole lot more reasonable.

I still think the Linux kernel should be resisting any submission of AI-written code, but this article does a good job of explaining that dropping the tagging requirement is a nothingburger.