FaceDeer comments on AI disclosure is no longer required for the Linux Kernel

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -2 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

According to the article imecth linked to in another comment it was already essentially meaningless.

parent

[–] refalo@programming.dev 6 points 12 hours ago* (2 children)

I think the hivemind has already spoken, they are taking this to mean that the kernel is now vibe-coded and people are actively jumping ship.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

The hivemind, aka a social media bubble.

Pretty sure most users of Linux are not part of that and are going to keep on using Linux.

Edit: looks like the Fediverse instance this community is running on is using tainted code by the definitions used in your link. Will this ship also be jumped?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 6 hours ago*

IDK but I have a lot of issues with that list anyway... they seem to have a strange definition of "permissive AI policy", i.e. any mere mention of an AI service gets you on the list.

Example: OpenBSD and NetBSD both show as "permissive" on the list, even though both have publicly stated otherwise, just because there are one or two commits where someone (prominent dev) commented something like "I had help from Claude but you can't tell, and I personally vouch for this and I know what I'm doing."

permalink

fedilink

source

parent