all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 15 minutes ago*

Should have argued that Putin shat in the bus. Since this is the UK, she would have been excused without question and got to keep her job.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 44 minutes ago

    Unless you directly shit on the seat such a fart odour doesn’t stick around for that long. It also seems unfair to dismiss someone even during a probation period if it only happened once like who’s to say it would happen again?

  • source
  • [–] 41 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

    I don't really think this is funny. Like if this is a medical thing what is that person supposed to do? Like, I guess this can be used as a good example of why capitalism is bad.

    Idk people get fired for medical related smell issues all the time. It fucking sucks, and like they have to work cause we live at the wim of the ruling class. People think it's a moral failure to smell bad and its honestly part of the issue. Yes, hygiene is important, but people can smell with good hygiene. Which is something a lot of people struggle to wrap their brains around.

    I say this as someone who is sensitive to smells. Like, idk pay people to stay home if we can't stand to smell them.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (2 children)

    Well would it be fair to make the next driver have to come in and sit in that shit seat everyday? Or for the riders to have to smell it? Certain people simply can't do certain jobs. If the gas that bad is her normal, she shouldn't work around other people. Disability or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 37 minutes ago

    It's not literal shit. It is smell. Which can be dealt with if our buses were not horrible.

    And yeah, maybe this job isn't the best for this person but this is supposedly the instance of people who care about material conditions. If you want this fixed in a way that isn't abelist that means giving this person a way to handle it. Not make a mockery of them like a bunch of bullies on the playground.

    Also "this person shouldn't have a job around other people" is honestly a wild thing to jump to here. What is the actual situation? Maybe this person is disabled and not able to get help and doing the best they can. Maybe they are a terrible person. Who knows! All we know is someone was stinky on the bus. How far does this go? Do we put them under house arrest?

    All I'm saying is you can't exactly go to your western government of choice to their fuck you... Sorry their "disability" aid departments and say "hey I have a medical problem that makes me stink and no one wants to be around me. Can I get enough benefits to stay home and have a decent life?" At best you get what everyone else does which is barely enough to stay alive. But given that you can't get help when you show up with one of your feet in a bag, I doubt a person with this issue is going to get any aid either.

    I'm honestly very tired of this individualistic frame work for everything. Instead of us doing some actual investigation (with actual dignity to those involved cause you never know what someone is going through) and figure out the root cause to how we got to a problem and deal with that. Instead we claim to want to get rid of capitalism and go up against the ruling class, meanwhile we constantly inforce the very things that keep us stuck in this mudpit.

    I apologize for being the way I am right now. But I honestly find these type of rag pieces and the pointing and laughing reaction they are supposed to get out of people beyond immature. It's actually dangerous. It's the type of shit that drives people to suicide who might have similar problems. I mean that is what such school yard bullying does. I have no idea how we can live in the day and age we do. Where we know how harmful such behavior can be and still do it as adults

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 43 minutes ago*

    Did the company offer a non-public facing role, or any other kind of accomodations before jumping to firing? From what I see from the article there were complaints by co-workers but no intention on the company's end to remediate the situation without firing her. The company should make sure her and her co-worker feel secure in their work.

    Sure, let's say certain people cannot do certain jobs (lots to unpack there, but whatever), but does that mean they have to go hungry and be humiliated because of a medical condition? Because what you seem to imply is that it's justified that someone lost their livelihood because they were presenting a problem to the company and their co-workers, which i'm sure is great for someone who's already struggling with medical issues and won't impede their capacity to find other employment or improve their medical situation at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 7 hours ago*

    Thought this might be something the tabloids are exaggerating but nope I was able to confirm this was a real tribunal case.

    On the day of the first incident the Tribunal finds that the Second Respondent became aware of a significant odour whilst working in proximity to the Claimant and genuinely believed the odour emanated from the Claimant.

    The Tribunal accepts the evidence of the Second Respondent that the odour was consistent with faecal matter potentially caused by significant flatulence which had led to soiling and was not associated with urine or urinary incontinence.

    Basically a legally binding "whoever denied it supplied it" ruling.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 8 hours ago

    More proof of our wildly unequal society:

    "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and sh[it myself], and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK?" trump-anguish

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 8 hours ago

    Poor lady. I could understand being fired if you had a history of showing up to work smelly but this was a one off and it might have been a medical thing.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

    lol, i applaud the effort and great beefs of strength, but if you fart and still smell like poop enough to get called out by your domestic partner hours later, after leaving the scene of the crime and going home... you have caked your pants. scientifically speaking.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

    It was the next driver who drove the bus immediately after that was asked by her partner if she had shit herself, not driver who was fired for farting.

    But really, how do we know that smeller's not the feller? It's almost always the one who articulated it that particulated it, if you know what I'm saying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

    But really, how do we know that smeller's not the feller?

    someone is gonna say this in court

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 hours ago

    That's a get sent home offense at worst.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 hours ago* (1 child)

    This seems like it could have been a discussion and beano / anti gas accommodation. Hygiene questions usually don't insta terminate people. Maybe some clean wipes and lysol between shifts. Way overkill terminating.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 hours ago

    Everyone involved is filthy. Europe, smh.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

    Reminds me of a joke from my dad.

    I started to write it out, but realized it's actually pretty gross.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

    I want to hear it. DM it too me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments