Thought this might be something the tabloids are exaggerating but nope I was able to confirm this was a real tribunal case.

On the day of the first incident the Tribunal finds that the Second Respondent became aware of a significant odour whilst working in proximity to the Claimant and genuinely believed the odour emanated from the Claimant.

The Tribunal accepts the evidence of the Second Respondent that the odour was consistent with faecal matter potentially caused by significant flatulence which had led to soiling and was not associated with urine or urinary incontinence.

Basically a legally binding "whoever denied it supplied it" ruling.