all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 12 hours ago

Graph is wrong, GPT is clearly using negative numbers

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 20 hours ago

    ok bear with me, since I have dyscalculia and don't get these things easily:
    does the whole diagram say: "over time the model numbers change" and that's it?

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

    Joke's on them, I'm almost done training FaceBot 9000.

    Granted, it's a 1.2B model and the training data is entirely My Little Pony fanfics. It's insane and thinks it's Princess Luna. But it's going to dominate this benchmark.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

    Oh sweet I always wanted to talk to Princess Luna!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 13 hours ago*

    We don't want to lose the number war, but we didn't start it^TM^

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 18 hours ago

    Number goes up, can't argue with that!

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 19 hours ago

    Gotta look past the bad charting - GPT's line is just going lower and lower with each release.

  • source