With something like this, we know we are on the right track.

all 46 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 61 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I don't believe for a second the man fails to see the hypocrisy - he and his masters exercise hypocrisy like a muscle.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

    If I read this comment last year I would have responded that they are fucking with us, saying insane bullshit to draw attention. Nowadays I am just convinced that they are idiots, somehow western institutions of all stripes have managed to draw in the most inane people possible. I don't think this man or Trump can be hypocritical, they just lack the cognitive capacity to be consistent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I've learned to split my assessment between followers and authoritarians. The followers tend to be like that, good at compartmentalizing and kinda just plain dumb, but the authoritarians follow a more dark triad pattern. Fairly normal intelligence, on the low end - but definitely smart enough to know they're getting away with something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
  • [–] 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I mean yeah it is ‘self-interest’, that’s not a gotcha. This is what the US wanted, Europe taking more control over their defence. Maybe if they hadn’t been so aggressive and stupid in their approach, countries would have continued buying US weapons.

    Absolutly a self own by Trump

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    This is what the US wanted, Europe taking more control over their defence.

    Buying more US weapons, not developing their own... Read the fine prints for hell's sake 😜

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago*

    The problem is that Republicans have demonstrated that they are perfectly fine having a leader who will just whip out sanctions left and right, often for no readily apparent reason. Continuing to rely on US manufactured weapons constitutes an unacceptable national security risk, because at any point support for those weapon systems maybe withdrawn.

    They should have maybe thought about this before letting the international skid mark loose.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    "Spend more on defense!"

    ...

    "Wait, not like that!"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago

    Defending oneself is one of the most basic forms of self-interest. It's in the fucking name.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 3 weeks ago

    hahahahahahahaaaa

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

    Well yeah. That's how it's supposed to work isn't it, capitalism?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

    It's protectionism, and it doesn't work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    Protecting against hostile actions taken by the US United States?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    Protectionism doesn't work whoever applies it. America has tried this before. The EU's single market is protectionist as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    Free market capitalism doesn't work either, because the invisible hand doesn't work. So regulated capitalism, which you seem to be conflating with protectionism, mitigate the downsides of capitalism and isolationism to give something that isn't as bad as either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    True. But free trade works. Tariffs like the US is using and non tariff barriers like the EU use doesn't.

    It's made even worse when you add austerity because that reduces your internal single market trade as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    Free trade is not the same thing as free market capitalism. Canada and the US had a free trade deal for decades, but there were still limits on what or how much could be traded, and still had tariffs on some things (mainly agricultural products) even when they had a free trade agreement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    That was my point. Protectionism reduces comparative advantage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Yeah, but national security also has a monetary value, even if you're not aware of the difference between protectionism and regulation, and lack of national security also reduces comparative (competitive?) advantage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    How are cheese quotas relevant to national security?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Weren't they just bitching about Europe not having their own defense and relying too much on the US?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    Well, surely he is an expert on the topic of self-interest.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago

    The Pentagon has fiercely opposed the move, despite the US administration heaping pressure on NATO's European allies to become more independent in their self-defence.>

    Left hand - right hand, meet.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    They fucked around and now they’re finding out. I mean what did Americans think electing the „America first!!1“ guy as president would look to the rest of the world anyway?

    I guess many of them weren‘t really aware there was a whole world out there but still. Deep down they know other countries do exist and can see what‘s happening in the USofA.

    Countries and Unions acting in self interest is pretty much the default anyway but the current US administration built their entire propaganda machine on that premise. The world watched and drew their conclusions. Especially after the orange turd got the middle east all clogged up.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    You mean like with the "made in america" push and the aggressive taxing?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    LOL, "how dare you MEGA!"

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    It's really something, them talking about "self-interest"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    What the US is exhibiting is 'billionaire interest' to be frank. It's certainly not what is in the best interests of the whole or even the vast majority of the country. Sigh. Please bear with us as we get rid of this fascist infection. And remember fascism doesn't respect borders.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    Ah, yes, the duality of USA's foreign policy w.r.t to the EU: We want you to pay (us) more and take on more responsibility for your own defense, but only in such a way that we still get to keep all our soft and hard power over you.

    This may have become more obvious under Trump, but this is nothing new to anyone paying attention since the late 90s / early 00s.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    Ohhh man, thats too good. Our hats are made in the EU, not "chyna"

    This makes me so happy!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    First Usa has sailed further and further away from it's allies and from the whole "western" world.

    Now they look at us and recognize that we are far away?

  • source
  • We need to start writing these articles in a different tone. Instead of "slams" say stuff like "US ambassador compliments the EU for getting more independent" etc

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    [nasal voice over intercom] Has patient number 13 reveived his sedatives yet?

  • source