Your writing is shit, buddy.
post
This post looks like it was written by an ai that had a stroke.
Not reading all that. Free Palestine!
"It’s lazy and a ultimatumon effort and autodidatic capacity."
dafuk
As with pollution, the biggest contributers are not the individual consumers.
They still contribute by counting as usage to help justify more datacenters for training.
Even just cloud storage uses a surprising amount of energy. I’ve my students calculate a price per rick roll just to start seeing that there are actual energy costs and usage associated with things like google search, storing a cloud file, etc. I forget the paradox name, but we’ve made storing files and the cloud (that is, using other people’s computers) so easy and efficient that we are now using even more energy.
The ironic thing is that this post reads like it was written by an AI trained on only thesauruses.
Thesauri? Thesaures?
Thesauropods
Views on AI have nothing to do with left or right. It's actually split right down the middle on both sides.
But the left wouldn't be the left if we weren't fucking fighting each other all the time instead of the right.
Idk... Anarchism and ML have history lol
Yes and no. AI (the ideal) is labor replacement, similar to the first industrial machines. But instead of manual labor, it is replacing cognitive labor. Under capitalism, when profit is always the end game, labor saving tech will not be used to liberate, but to further exploit the people and rape our planet. This is no different, I think. Usually this kind of capital is held mostly in the hands of one class of people, but this tech is unique in that it has the ability to, once trained, be copied and iterated on by others. Open source, or eventually hacked. Software yearns to be free, in the sense that it can be copied easily. Point is, control over the development and distribution of AI is so difficult that even the "common sense" right* end up feeling betrayed. It mainly benefits the far right and the oligarchic class.
For now, it is not the ideal. But the intentions of the most powerful people seem to continue to race towards unregulated, privately controlled AI. They talk of slowing down, but I don't have my hopes up after everything that's happened.
Bro, this would just be the top spot in photoshop battles. A skillset that used to be really really accessible is now no longer even fun because well-done results will be considered gen AI.
Also, your writing seems like an AI prompt that says: be outraged at AI, make every mistake.
Jesus christ that text post was mildly infuriating. Please slow down and use words you both know how to spell and how to use in a sentence.
kthx.
Honestly, just take a generic picture of any band and just use paint or gimp to slap their faces on. Hell doesn't even have to be good
Can we also talk about how his #1 song is promoting heterosexuality? More than 80 % of children who heard Shape of You in the 2010s now identify as heterosexual, and it continues to air on the radio and show up on streaming services without as much as a content warning. What the fuck?
Whoever made that could have easily done it with basic photo editing skills instead of AI. Even if it didn't turn out great, it would still show that a person cared enough to try doing it themselves.
Honestly there are bigger fish to fry, and the world isn't black and white.
Sometimes you have to fight fire with fire.
I'm sure theres a few other idiom's I'm not thinking of.
A bad photoshop or paint would do the trick too. Abd arguably it would be funnier too
Did you eat a thesaurus?
So it’s still about the leftists ???
Correct me please but when we have an AI pic with Trump and Netanyahu it’s still about the leftists?
OMG the irony of using AI to rail against the use of AI.
Bluesky leftists really like using AI for some reason
I liked the imagery of you scratching your eyes out.
Don't mind the people shitting on your writing! It's fine.
Also, I wonder about this. I don't like using GenAI for a few reasons, one of them is the environmental impact, but it's by no means the biggest. Not even close. It really is barely a reason at all.
It's a tool... I think it's immorally constructed and mostly in bad taste, but the environment is really a much deeper failure than the individual, I think. I don't think campaigning against people using something mindlessly, ignorantly perhaps, blithely even, does much good, when you could spend that time convincing them that the big stuff, and there's big stuff like data centers if we wanna just stick to AI, should be banned or regulated to oblivion.
"Don't use GenAI" is fine, but "Data centers suck" results in the same thing and doesn't attack the individual for some perceived moral failing for doing something innocuous while surrounded by terrible shit.
Hopefully you get what I'm getting at!
Credits to pmjv

top 50 comments