I ABHOR how normalised AI has become on platforms around the World Wide Web

It's lazy and a ultimatumon effort and autodidatic capacity.

You are actively resorting to waste hydropower energy and drag us into potential water shortage pandemonium just to lobotomized what could've been a perfectly good joke.

This is one of the online exertions that treasonous vermin Trump wants you to enact to entail his horrible totalitarian deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions .

Stop appeasing to that oligarch genocide funding clown and his immoral calavry of fascist oppressors who operates utilities that are primarily made to pollute our ecosystem and increase climate change and ocean levels raising.

If I ever see another shitty No-effort AI Picture like this again, I will actively and violently scratch out my eyes with a rusty garden weasel wrapped in mint condition barbed wire and sandpaper the wounded sockets shut so I could never see slop take control of meme subculture.

Is it that sophisticated to edit Trump's head over a keyboardist's anatomy?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 13 minutes ago

OMG the irony of using AI to rail against the use of AI.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 hours ago

    Make your own version and post it in the comments.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    I think i can sum it up a little more concisely. You can't fight the Epstein class with the tools of the Epstein class.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    Honestly there are bigger fish to fry, and the world isn't black and white.

    Sometimes you have to fight fire with fire.

    I'm sure theres a few other idiom's I'm not thinking of.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 hours ago

    Bro, this would just be the top spot in photoshop battles. A skillset that used to be really really accessible is now no longer even fun because well-done results will be considered gen AI.

    Also, your writing seems like an AI prompt that says: be outraged at AI, make every mistake.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

    "It’s lazy and a ultimatumon effort and autodidatic capacity."

    dafuk

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

    How are people doing these so common though, the big models wont do real people

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago
    [–] 10 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

    Can we also talk about how his #1 song is promoting heterosexuality? More than 80 % of children who heard Shape of You in the 2010s now identify as heterosexual, and it continues to air on the radio and show up on streaming services without as much as a content warning. What the fuck?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 hours ago (6 children)

    Views on AI have nothing to do with left or right. It's actually split right down the middle on both sides.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 hours ago

    Yes and no. AI (the ideal) is labor replacement, similar to the first industrial machines. But instead of manual labor, it is replacing cognitive labor. Under capitalism, when profit is always the end game, labor saving tech will not be used to liberate, but to further exploit the people and rape our planet. This is no different, I think. Usually this kind of capital is held mostly in the hands of one class of people, but this tech is unique in that it has the ability to, once trained, be copied and iterated on by others. Open source, or eventually hacked. Software yearns to be free, in the sense that it can be copied easily. Point is, control over the development and distribution of AI is so difficult that even the "common sense" right* end up feeling betrayed. It mainly benefits the far right and the oligarchic class.

    For now, it is not the ideal. But the intentions of the most powerful people seem to continue to race towards unregulated, privately controlled AI. They talk of slowing down, but I don't have my hopes up after everything that's happened.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

    But the left wouldn't be the left if we weren't fucking fighting each other all the time instead of the right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 hours ago* (3 children)

    liberals and socialists fighting eachother isn't leftists fighting eachother, as liberalism isn't left wing

    that's what the case is almost all the time when people call something "leftist infighting"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

    Idk... Anarchism and ML have history lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    yeah but anarchists aren't relevant, and real anarchists recognize that marxism is preferable to capitalism

    i'd argue that "anarchists" who prefer capitalism to what is in their opinion the wrong type of socialism and spend all their time fighting against "evil tankies" online instead of fighting capitalism, are just edgy liberals larping because they like the radical aesthetic of anarchism

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 5 hours ago*

    Lmao in one sentence you perfectly exposed why anarchists hate MLs. Aside from all the historical bs, anarchists are just expected to go along with ML because it's "better than capitalism", but you'll never see any ML giving any ground to anarchists.

    Ironically that makes you quite similar to liberals, who always want the left to support them but never give any ground :)

    Personally, I can fight more than one thing at a time. But since you don't think that's possible, why are you more focused on fighting anarchists in your comment than capitalism? Is this projection? Are you a liberal? 🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 119 points 21 hours ago (14 children)

    Your writing is shit, buddy.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

    At least it isn't AI.

    I'll take irritation fueled spelling error littered rants over a succinct, correctly parsed AI slop response any day of the week

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

    How can you tell? It might very well be considering how many fancy words were used there. Nothing about that reads as not-AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

    Maybe use an LLM to clean it up

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 18 hours ago

    Ouch. The stupid thing is that this existed 4 years ago too. This doesn’t have to be anything AI. We’ve been photoshopping since the printing press was a thing.

    What a misplaced post to rant about a tech that may have nothing to do with the picture.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 70 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    This post looks like it was written by an ai that had a stroke.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 48 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    Not reading all that. Free Palestine!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›