I ABHOR how normalised AI has become on platforms around the World Wide Web

It's lazy and a ultimatumon effort and autodidatic capacity.

You are actively resorting to waste hydropower energy and drag us into potential water shortage pandemonium just to lobotomized what could've been a perfectly good joke.

This is one of the online exertions that treasonous vermin Trump wants you to enact to entail his horrible totalitarian deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions .

Stop appeasing to that oligarch genocide funding clown and his immoral calavry of fascist oppressors who operates utilities that are primarily made to pollute our ecosystem and increase climate change and ocean levels raising.

If I ever see another shitty No-effort AI Picture like this again, I will actively and violently scratch out my eyes with a rusty garden weasel wrapped in mint condition barbed wire and sandpaper the wounded sockets shut so I could never see slop take control of meme subculture.

Is it that sophisticated to edit Trump's head over a keyboardist's anatomy?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 136 points 1 month ago (16 children)

Your writing is shit, buddy.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    At least it isn't AI.

    I'll take irritation fueled spelling error littered rants over a succinct, correctly parsed AI slop response any day of the week

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    How can you tell? It might very well be considering how many fancy words were used there. Nothing about that reads as not-AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Maybe use an LLM to clean it up

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago

    Ouch. The stupid thing is that this existed 4 years ago too. This doesn’t have to be anything AI. We’ve been photoshopping since the printing press was a thing.

    What a misplaced post to rant about a tech that may have nothing to do with the picture.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 84 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    This post looks like it was written by an ai that had a stroke.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 57 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Not reading all that. Free Palestine!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    "It’s lazy and a ultimatumon effort and autodidatic capacity."

    dafuk

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 27 points 1 month ago

    the - sau - rus

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    As with pollution, the biggest contributers are not the individual consumers.

    No, your AI prompts aren’t causing an energy crisis

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    They still contribute by counting as usage to help justify more datacenters for training.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Even just cloud storage uses a surprising amount of energy. I’ve my students calculate a price per rick roll just to start seeing that there are actual energy costs and usage associated with things like google search, storing a cloud file, etc. I forget the paradox name, but we’ve made storing files and the cloud (that is, using other people’s computers) so easy and efficient that we are now using even more energy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    The ironic thing is that this post reads like it was written by an AI trained on only thesauruses.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Views on AI have nothing to do with left or right. It's actually split right down the middle on both sides.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    But the left wouldn't be the left if we weren't fucking fighting each other all the time instead of the right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Yes and no. AI (the ideal) is labor replacement, similar to the first industrial machines. But instead of manual labor, it is replacing cognitive labor. Under capitalism, when profit is always the end game, labor saving tech will not be used to liberate, but to further exploit the people and rape our planet. This is no different, I think. Usually this kind of capital is held mostly in the hands of one class of people, but this tech is unique in that it has the ability to, once trained, be copied and iterated on by others. Open source, or eventually hacked. Software yearns to be free, in the sense that it can be copied easily. Point is, control over the development and distribution of AI is so difficult that even the "common sense" right* end up feeling betrayed. It mainly benefits the far right and the oligarchic class.

    For now, it is not the ideal. But the intentions of the most powerful people seem to continue to race towards unregulated, privately controlled AI. They talk of slowing down, but I don't have my hopes up after everything that's happened.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Bro, this would just be the top spot in photoshop battles. A skillset that used to be really really accessible is now no longer even fun because well-done results will be considered gen AI.

    Also, your writing seems like an AI prompt that says: be outraged at AI, make every mistake.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    Credits to pmjv

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Jesus christ that text post was mildly infuriating. Please slow down and use words you both know how to spell and how to use in a sentence.

    kthx.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)
    [–] 17 points 1 month ago

    Honestly, just take a generic picture of any band and just use paint or gimp to slap their faces on. Hell doesn't even have to be good

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    Make your own version and post it in the comments.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Can we also talk about how his #1 song is promoting heterosexuality? More than 80 % of children who heard Shape of You in the 2010s now identify as heterosexual, and it continues to air on the radio and show up on streaming services without as much as a content warning. What the fuck?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Whoever made that could have easily done it with basic photo editing skills instead of AI. Even if it didn't turn out great, it would still show that a person cared enough to try doing it themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Honestly there are bigger fish to fry, and the world isn't black and white.

    Sometimes you have to fight fire with fire.

    I'm sure theres a few other idiom's I'm not thinking of.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    So it’s still about the leftists ???

    Correct me please but when we have an AI pic with Trump and Netanyahu it’s still about the leftists?

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    OMG the irony of using AI to rail against the use of AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Bluesky leftists really like using AI for some reason

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    I liked the imagery of you scratching your eyes out.

    Don't mind the people shitting on your writing! It's fine.

    Also, I wonder about this. I don't like using GenAI for a few reasons, one of them is the environmental impact, but it's by no means the biggest. Not even close. It really is barely a reason at all.

    It's a tool... I think it's immorally constructed and mostly in bad taste, but the environment is really a much deeper failure than the individual, I think. I don't think campaigning against people using something mindlessly, ignorantly perhaps, blithely even, does much good, when you could spend that time convincing them that the big stuff, and there's big stuff like data centers if we wanna just stick to AI, should be banned or regulated to oblivion.

    "Don't use GenAI" is fine, but "Data centers suck" results in the same thing and doesn't attack the individual for some perceived moral failing for doing something innocuous while surrounded by terrible shit.

    Hopefully you get what I'm getting at!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›