The foreskin of Jesus, a scrap from his circumcision, is considered sacred. It was displayed and paraded as recently as 1983, but then stolen from its jewel-encrusted case. Srsly. Google HOLY PREPUCE.

all 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 31 points 1 month ago (13 children)

LEAVING OUT THE BEST PART. The way they authenticated the foreskin was by tasting it.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    The lord's foreskin has a slight spice to it. Great addition to any soup or stew.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Or, according to one account, it ascended with him and became the rings of Saturn.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    OK. So normally these "Google the thing" is about something different and the setup is misdirection (ie: Google 40% cops).

    That is... legitimately more information about this. Wtf?

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    So how many other foreskins were saved in the off chance that the kid was going to grow up and become famous? Who was collecting these foreskins back then? Do we have a modern-day creep waiting for the perfect moment to sell their Justin Beiber, Jaden Smith, or Ed Furlong foreskins? I know with newly invented DNA it would be trivial to confirm whose is whose. But back in 300AD you could only take the word of some guy with a bunch of foreskins that the one he is selling you is, in fact, the real deal.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Dude here dislikes collectors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I don't dislike collectors I just can't fathom a relic lasting that long and not being eaten and replaced with a pig asshole somewhere and possibly a few times along the way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Not stolen, just removed. THAT was the year that they examined many relics for authenticity, due to better age determinations. Many relicks failed in those tests, was regularly on the news at the time

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Find it. Let’s clone that dude and let him settle all this bullshit with these religious crazies

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I don't know what is done to the removed skin but I seriously doubt it is kept in any way.

    But this is about relics and at some point someone made the calculations and realized the claimed number of pieces of the holy cross held in different churches and monasteries throughout Europe would be enough to put together a small forest.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    "Foreskin cruncher"? I'm already throwing up.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Christians are dolts

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    What stand does it give me?

    【FORESKIN 500】

    『Five Hundred』

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Another roadside attraction?

  • source