It's just a copy. The original still exists somewhere. That's not stealing.
Reverse Sony logic.
It's just a copy. The original still exists somewhere. That's not stealing.
Reverse Sony logic.
I mean it’s OK - you’re not copying it, you’re using it to train an intelligence.
Just feed it to an AI, that makes it OK. I think having a local speech model on your phone in the same room with you while watching should be sufficient.
I have this new AI tool. Free and open source, model and all, and extremely CPU-efficient. Basically you feed it the training data (like some New York Times articles, but it can be any text or binary), and it can produce a 1:1 output when prompted. I call it "copi"; can I get my five trillion tax dollars now?
Warning! ⚠️ do not consume!
See the real loophole is that I have de-registered myself as a conscious observer. In the eyes of the government, I have never seen a movie, or watched a TV show, or listened to an album.
The Jellyfin instance, which normally just plays Ubuntu and other distro ISOs, of course.
I too stream Linux ISOs via my Jellyfin. My family enjoys it as well.
DVD/Blu-Ray rips are legal in some countries if you don't distribute them
You can also have open-source songs like the GNU/hackers one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sJUDx7iEJw
There is only one song though.
Someone give this person a congressional hearing and billions of dollars to burn
I hope this is not against rules 4 and 6, but... I fear it might be?
If you want me to remove the post just tell me (or report it to the mods, of course).
I'm only sharing this because I found it very funny :)
It is fun of course, or people don't have a sense of humor.
It shows a sad truth of today's world. People just repeat what they see without questioning it. They share what they see without knowing if it's true. They bend the news title to get more reach. It sucks.
@talkingpumpkin@lemmy.world you have the genes of IE6
Does that person explain what exactly they mean by "breaking confinement" resp "escaping sandboxing" and how it happened?
edit: I clicked the link now and there is no explanation. I'm not sure they're even serious. I think this is some kind of netizen dada.
end-users are rarely prosecuted or sued over piracy so idk why corporations wouldn't get the same deal.
this is a big nothingburger if you wanna be honest.
piracy is much like drugs, where the occasional dealer gets nabbed if they're too ostentatious but otherwise things just go on and on and on and on.
end-users are rarely prosecuted or sued over piracy
That wasn't always true. The RIAA sued many people over music downloads (via bittorent since they're technically hosting at the same time as downloading). They only stopped once the major studios figured out it would cost less to force the ISPs to do it for them.
Because corporations aren't pirating for personzl consumption, they are pirating to ingest huge amounts of data for commercial use.
I can't tell whether you're kidding or not.
In Germany you absolutely get subpoenaed for the slightest copyright infringement. There a law firm called "Waldorf Frommer" that does all the dirty work for the so called rights holders.
Because corporations are repackaging the content and selling it, a big distinction you missed Mr. McNothingburger.
all 41 comments