top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 118 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

It appears Google tries to degrade alternative application stores to just another app offered through the Play Store, and therefore subject to Google's policies (including an annual $5,000 fee for policy and security reviews). So I wouldn't be surprised this is very much intentional: as to force application stores through a channel controlled by Google, to technically allow competition (at Google's discretion) while ultimately killing "side-loading" through other sources.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 94 points 3 weeks ago (51 children)

    Guys, work on improving Linux phone instead. Google is taking Android away from you and it just isn’t worth arguing with them about it. Let them hang themselves. Build a better alternative.

  • source
  • hideshow 51 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    You wish it’d be that easy. Building a phone isn’t the difficult part; building an ecosystem around is a huge task.

    Where I live, you are almost forced to own either an Android or an iPhone, otherwise it’s tough luck getting banking, secure net identification, way to interact with the government agencies, bus or train tickets, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

    The endless challenge is that a phone needs to talk to the phone network. The radio manufacturers are deeply in bed with the surveillance state and they are absolutely opposed to free communication. Which means they will never allow a cell phone radio to work with free software.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

    Calling is something that works in e.g. Postmarket OS. The trickier parts are NFC payments, lack of apps. So it comes with huge drawbacks. Some apps can even require that your device is verified by google and you have no way of hijacking it.

    Proprietary camera software is also a huge thing. Software can do so much thing and you pay for the software also, not just the hardware but you lose the software when you install something other than the factory default.

    And battery optimization is very young in desktop grade linux OSes, you won't get that good battery life as with android.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    NFC and battery life are absolutely huge concerns. Cell tower stuff isn’t great either but if you absolutely had to many of us can live without cellular and just do VOIP.

    Apps aren’t that big an issue, waydroid is a thing and the appification of the internet is detrimental anyway. Do it in a browser.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (24 children)

    Platform is not the issue, apps are. Even on a Linux phone you will have to run android apps and you will have to install them from somewhere. And for most apps Play Store is the only place where apps are uploaded.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (21 children)

    Nobody needs apps. We had a world without them before. We can do it again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (17 children)

    Ok, you go and tell all the companies to stop using apps.

    My car charger? Controlled with an app.

    Location of car chargers? In an app.

    My bike GPS? Controlled with an app.

    My gym entry? An app.

    Climbing wall? An app.

    You tell all those companies to stop using apps and add control panels to everything, go back to paper maps and RFID entry cards. I'm sure they will do it if you explain to them that there are dozens of users that don't want to register with Google. Dozens!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 68 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

    Misleading title. After reading the linked Gitlab discussion it's more likely a backend change from Google side. Aurora does use burner account but early reports seem to suggest they are not flagged or rate limited.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 66 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I noticed these intermittently, but retrying later has seemed to resolve the updates.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 40 points 3 weeks ago (21 children)

    Well looks like its time to start making alternatives or scream for Linux to come out with a phone.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

    What alternative are you going to make? My bank only publishes their app on Play Store. I can either use Play Store app or Aurora to install it. You think that if you build alternative, open source store my bank will publish their app there? You think any bank will? F-Droid already exists, do you see any banks publishing their apps there? Do you see any of them dong Linux version of their apps?

    The alternative here would be some other corporation building independent app store and getting everyone to publish their apps there. Amazon tried that many years ago. Maybe Samsung could do it now. It's definitely not something we can make.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 31 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Classic Graphene users, making this all about themselves. This hurts Aurora users, period.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 3 weeks ago* (7 children)
    1. GrapheneOS isn't John Android. Stop black and white thinking. You don't have to fit in with people when you post to .ml.
    2. If you have read the thread you are posting (relevant message 18 hours ago as opposed to this post 13 hours ago), you would have seen that you can just press "reload accounts" to fix it.
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    people treating graphene like the only android OS drives me up the fucking wall, i'm sure it's great but holy SHIT lineage has existed for years and years but.. now it's suddenly irrelevant?

    Leaves a bad taste in my mouth

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago

    Lineage and GrapheneOS are not even in similar levels here. Yes, LineageOS (or any of its commercial forks) is great I'd you have anything other than a Pixel phone. Definitely beats having any stock Android. But having the choice and telling people that "GrapheneOS is not the only option" without context is intentionally guiding people that could potentially have a much more secure and way more private mobile experience look somewhere else just "because".

    I don't pretend to know what tour reasons are, could be because of Micay, could be because the GOS team of developers has no filter, I don't know. But even Louis Rossmann, who openly chose to get away from GOS because of Micay's actions has said, time and again, that nothing even comes close.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 23 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

    Seems like clickbait but the graphene devs recommend against aurora store in favor of using a second profile with the sandboxed play store

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    The Play Store requires a Google account. Using a second profile is extremely inconvenient.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    Graphene recommending this at all is extremely sus. My objective of using your operating system is to avoid giving Google any information I possibly can. Don't know why they always recommend using Google shit in a sandbox like those packets aren't still coming from my IP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    Its not sus. They're just hyper-aware of security. And Aurora is just not terribly secure. Its just that you're now choosing between privacy and maximum security. And I prioritize privacy, personally.

    They pretty much only recommend Accrescent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 23 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    It's on fdroid.

    I recommend blocking play store.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago*

    They are not blocking the download of the app from playstore. It was obviously not available there in the first place. They blocked API access to the google servers where aurora store was getting the apk files from. They just killed the concept of aurora store (and any alternative playstore frontend) entirely.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    It's working fine for me while logged in. It's always been crap when logged out. This is nothing new.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago

    Downgraded to Aurora Store 4.8.3 and now working well for the moment.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    So that is why my Aurora store have been having trouble latley :(

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    I was wondering cant we just scrape Play Store and distribute the apks on a different website? most apks has checksums so we will know nobody has changes the apk

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    There are a bunch of sites like apkmirror etc. that do that but eventually the large ones started enshittifying their service. On apkmirror for example you used to be able to just download the apk's, now they've invented a special "format" that can only be installed through their app. Needless to say that was the end of that, I'm not keen on giving install capability to any more apps than I absolutely have to. (Zero is the ideal answer in case you're wondering, but in practice it's usually one, the system file manager. Any other app can download apk's to /Downloads or go fuck itself.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago

    Looks a lot like an issue, more than the reality that the title is suggesting?

    click-bait?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    just tested it, at first i got rate limited(?) "server busy" but a minute later the updates went through fine

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    Yup can confirm. Some apps return this error (example tutamail and windscribe vpn). Fix it by downloading the apk in fdroid or github/ gitlab directly.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago

    Aurora still works for me for now on Samsung stock OS. I now mostly install Google Play apps with APKPure over Obtainium tho and only use Aurora for those not on APKPure. And most of my apps are from GitHub/GitLab releases and F-Droid. I disabled Google Play and didn't login to Google account. I don't want the requirement of a Google account to install an app and Play Integrity to run an app. It is by no means acceptable that a company, using a closed source implementation that also tracks user and breaks Android security model, can censor what apps a user can install and decide what security and privacy compromises a user needs to agree to just use the normal phone functionalities that they pay for and by no mean require those compromises technically. They are turning Android into a service and a prison like iOS did rather than a software.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›