all 36 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 1 day ago

This is the evil brilliance of Conservative marketing. The American working classes have been brainwashed to think what's good for Jeffy and Zucky and Donnie is what's good for them.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Ain't this a free market? Whatever happened to that idea

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)

    Hurt them? Hurt them? I want to DESTROY THEM!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Had the insurance industry but one throat I would slit it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    Abolition hurt the cotton and sugar industries, and yes, the slaving industry. There's even a song about it.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 days ago

    Insurance should have never been an "industry"

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    What about all the unions who fought for healthcare?

    -My dad, justifying voting for Hillary and later Biden in the primaries.

    Every election it was "yes, the left have policy that would directly benefit us, but the moderates won't vote for that so I shouldn't either."

    Well except when he voted Bush thinking he would get lower taxes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    “Moderates” is always such a silly term to me. They’re not actually moderate; their beliefs are corporate extremism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    Its not even a real thing. There is no contingent of voters who will vote for "means-tested subsidies to buy health insurance from 1 of 50 marketplaces based on what your family's expected healthcare needs are and employer contribution", but won't vote for free healthcare. There is no "help Israel do only a little genocide" vote.

    But every time, cable news would dupe the poor man into voting for what some imaginary moderate wanted instead of policy that materially benefits everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago
    [–] 13 points 2 days ago

    So literally no downsides is what you are saying?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago*

    Yes, and?

    That should mean that they can switch to doing something productive instead. It's not even bad capitalist politics.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago

    Emancipation was a huge hit to the slave trade industry

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    I literally had a bunch of my comments removed for saying this same thing

    Your problem isn't capitalism per-say, it's a government that supports corporations over you

    Doesn't matter what system you technically have, if the government cares more about businesses than they do you, you're fucked

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    I want nothing more than to hurt the industy and take jobs from those who perpetuate it.

    Introduce UBI at the same time.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago

    forget to add all these culminate into, hurts political parties as a wedge issue/single issue.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago

    And all those industries are filled with people who need those things, just like everybody else. They want them, too

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    We’re basically headed toward a dystopic authoritarian oligarchy with huge disparity. It’s gonna look like all those fictional dystopias portrayed in Elysium or Neuromancer but without all the cool tech. Yeah, we should have these social programs for people…but unless we crush the oligarchy they’ll create continuous pressure to make sure these social programs are as shitty as possible and be functionally the caricature of socialism the right wing uses for its propaganda. We’ll be second or third class citizens living in favelas or similar social housing.They won’t stop bleeding the people for more. But the thing is, if we get rid of the oligarchy we’ll not need such a huge social safety net*.

    *we should have a good one anyway, but it shouldn’t be a response to the disparity created by billionaires, we should just have one by default.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    This is all possible without asking Trump.

    All the people who want this: Pick one city to move to. Then build the housing with solar cells, public transport and a hospital.

    If banks don't finance this, have a lottery. One half has to stay and make money, the other half moves and builds the city. Once the city is profitable, the other half moves there, too.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Wow I never realized it was so easy, thanks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Where do you see the problems? I think the biggest obstacle is finding the people. Once that's solved everything else will be solved by the people who want to live in such a city.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    Bill Maher did "let's flip a district" like a decade and a half ago. Lots of words accurately describe you, but "original" isn't one of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    People settled entire continents. I am not claiming this as my idea. I am more puzzled that people don't do it. Why was "let’s flip a district” not successful?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago*
    • blank * industry is a threat to life on this planet.
  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago* (1 child)

    It's not even simply hurting the auto industry. People are weirdly attached to their mobile living rooms.

    PuBliC TrAnSpoRt? OuR CoUnTrY Is ToO BiG FoR ThAt AnD iT SuCkS. It's FoR PoOr PeOPlE AnD ThoSe WiTh DUI. We NeEd ChEapEr GaS11!!!!1

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • OhNoAnyway.jpg

  • source