this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
1052 points (98.2% liked)

memes

10440 readers
3811 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1052
ironic (lemmy.zip)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The very idea of "nothing to hide" is born from fear.

It's fundamentally a self-sabotaging philosophy. If I have nothing to hide, why do I need to be surveilled?

edit: source

edit2: see true source below if you have access or are willing to pay/pirate

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yeah kind of like how even on Reddit we have to think twice before saying what's REALLY on our minds

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I got permabanned once for telling someone to crawl into a hole.

I got permabanned a second time and fully quit reddit after bringing up the double standards of infant genital mutilation practices.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Some more than others.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No, you don't get it. They never said that they've got nothing to hide. So the rule must be that if you've got nothing to hide, spying is okay. But if you have something to hide, it's not okay. That means that it's okay to spy on you, but not okay to spy on criminals. Huh. This rule seems rather useless.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

"So in reversion of argument, since it's okay to spy on you because you have nothing to hide, spying on criminals is not ok, because they do have something to hide?"

Cleaned it up. Thanks for the argument!

[–] Octopus1348 1 points 1 year ago

*They got

I could hardly guess WTF theymfot means.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have a lot to hide.

That is why I close the door when using a public rest room, otherwise people see my tiny penis and I get jailed for being an exhibitionist.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I’ve reported you for verbal exhibitionism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Well it would just be a miniweene--er, a misdemeanor

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Say it with me (Cartman’s voice) ma proparta, ma data. “Public proparta”, our data

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey they just wanted to win an argument on the War Thunder forums.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You know, that guy made it to the opsec briefs now. They didn't go into why he posted them online though.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But..But... NATIONAL SECURITY!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The whole classification system needs reworking

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Say it with me (Cartman’s voice) ma proparta, ma data. “Public proparta”, our data

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree, but if you want to post politics please do it in c/politicalmemes, rule 2

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

yeah but it's the amount that matters:

even if I have a few molecules from einstein's brain in me, that does not make me a genius