191
gay (thelemmy.club)
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 13 hours ago

That person is an outlier and should not be considered for personal comparison.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

A spectrum has more than two parts. Think of a political spider.

[-] addie@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago

I'd always visualised sexuality as at least a triangle of straight/gay/ace, and everyone would be a point inside the triangle? Just a "straight line" seems too simple.

No doubt someone can suggest another axes to make it the sexuality three-sided pyramid, but not more than that, please; too early in the morning to try and visualise a hyperpyramid.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago

Even that is an oversimplification. For example bi people who only like cis people.

People are just into random sexy stuff and we lump them into groups.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

All I know is I wanna fuck Sandy Loam whoever they are.

[-] certified_expert@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago
[-] addie@feddit.uk 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I've maybe explained it a bit badly - I was thinking "like the soil triangle", but for sexuality. So you'd have the "100% gay corner" rather than "100% sandy".

edit: oh, yeah. A "straight line" between 100% straight and 100% gay would be too simple, in that there should be more options. Should have used a different term, but what I mean is that you can't just assign people a single number here, people are more complex than that.

[-] certified_expert@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Nonono, it was a joke: straight line, gay line... eh? 🤷‍♂️

it was a silly game of words

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's me. I'm the gayest. :3

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Called it! I'm just waiting to collect my winnings. I'd like to thank all the people who believed in me, and the gods (of course) for making this possible.

That is a rather impressive amount of gayness.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago
[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Could be an open set, with a Cauchy sequence of gayer and gayer folks, but not including the limit point.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 20 hours ago

We've got a finite set here, so that would imply there is a gayest person at any given moment of time. But yeah, I would expect it to have multiple variables and not guarantee existence of the gayest for all parameters, the chosen one if you will

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I’ve only met a finite number of gay folks, but I’m willing to accept the possibility that there are infinitely many gay folks I haven’t met!

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Someone had to set the bar.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Going to hell...?

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
191 points (98.5% liked)

I'm going to Hell for this

156 readers
397 users here now

Humor, no censor. Rule: Dont be a dick

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS