“trump legitimizes a dictator. Again.”
The tankies have something in common with Trump then, huh.
He is an irredeemable piece of shit.
Yeah and Kim Jong Un sucks too.
Most likely an excuse to cover pulling more equipment/manpower from the area to throw at the failing Iran war.
This was exactly my thought as well
Well done USA. this is why democracies around the world don't trust you anymore.
I wonder who Americans will elect next? Maybe J. D. Vance or Pete Hegseth? Unless of course they can find someone even more crazy. 😬
It's absolutely insane that USA isn't even moderately on the side of democracy anymore. But instead favor enemies of democracy, and have themselves become an enemy to democracy too.
Ivanka will inherit the White House. Democracy in the US is dead and gone.
You can just call it “the American Regime.” We’ve been that way a long time if anyone stands in the way of corporate profits, or capitalism… but now we’re just mask off fully because we have an idiot in charge.
There used to be a synergy between supporting freedom democracy and having the economy thrive on it.
USA is now disregarding and throwing overboard everything that made USA the world leader with the most allies of any country ever.
Which supporting freedom democracy did we support? Are you just not counting the socialist and communist democracies our CIA overthrew and installed a pro capitalist dictator?
Believing the USA was ever a “freedom democracy” supporter is pure delusion.
You are very very wrong.
When they liberated Europe and the world in WW2 from the axis powers together with England, Canada and many other allies, there is no doubt USA supported freedom and democracy. And even granted the conquered countries their freedom.
So USA’s identity stems from 1945 years ago after a world war, and not the other most recent 80 years of despicable, anti democratic behavior?
I fail to see how that’s not completely delusional.
Which supporting freedom democracy did we support?
You just wrote in past tense, giving me the freedom to use the most obvious example that you are wrong.
Believing the USA was ever a “freedom democracy” supporter is pure delusion.
Here you even use EVER, further legitimizing my point.
You are moving the goal post, and absolutely USA has been helping democracies like for instance South Korea and Taiwan a lot, even Japan could be included in that list. And the formation of NATO to protect democracies against Soviet Union and now Russia is also an example.
Trump is not a NATO supporter, he is on the contrary trying to destroy it. And NATO is absolutely created with the main objective to defend democracies on both sides of the Atlantic.
Let’s not forget that it’s not “Americans “ it’s some Americans
Oh, and these Americans who it is not, are relevant to this how?
you only have 1 government, and that's the 1 Americans elected, and ALL Americans are part of USA and American civilization.
Meaning that even if they disagree with the government, they are part of the economy, workforce and society the government control.
I sympathize with every American that voted against Trump, and tried to prevent this, and those that have demonstrated against him. But unfortunately it doesn't change what USA currently is to the rest of the world, and how we need to relate to USA as a country.
Don't worry the Dems will appoint the most evil Neo-Lib possible and make sure no one comes out to vote for them and ensuring another Republican government.
wait, that's not a good option
Can this stupid motherfucker just die already
ghouls of a feather…
No puppet . . no puppet . . . you're the puppet
Check Polymarket for bets on NK invading SK.
If there's a bet, you know that he's gonna make money from it and it'll most likely be announced.
Iran should take notes. The best time to develop nukes was twenty years ago. The second best time is now. One missile aimed at the Epsteini capital and you too can have a 'very good relationship'.

politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News