Didn't Mythbusters test all of these covers and coatings in like 2004 and basically none of them worked against a traffic cam of that era?
post
The foolproof solution is to sneak up to the camera, at night, with no electronics on your person, and shoot the fucking thing down.
I mean, they make manual pipe cutters. They're not that expensive and operate silently. No reason to activate the shot spotter microphones
I recently watched a video about the quickest and quietest way to cut through thin wall tube, that had absolutely nothing to do with cameras what so ever. They determined portable band saws were the most practical method; balance being relatively quiet compared to other power tools while being the quickest. Manual tools were most quiet but the slowest which leaves you vulnerable.
That's very helpful to know, in case I need any poles or pipes cut! Thank you kind internet stranger!
"Shoot"!? I'm American too, but not all problems can/should be solved with guns...
-
Wrong!
-
This one can!
I did specify "should"! Hypothetically, cutting it down would be:
- more effective
- quieter
- risking fewer charges
- more permanent
This is why populism works against us. We are always trying to high-road everything.
What the cops in NYC do is they wedge a leaf in the plate frame, so there's always a leaf partially blocking 1 letter.
The cameras will track you anyways. You'll just get tagged as "2003 Honda civic, gray, license plates unreadable..." along with a descriptive list of any stickers on the back of the car.
Flock also captures WiFi and Bluetooth MAC addresses and IMEI for cell signals. Even if they don’t get a license plate if your car has wireless CarPlay or Android Auto, if you’re connected via Bluetooth, if you have an in car hotspot, or if you have any connected services (remote start, phone app, traffic), they can track you by that.
A license plate is no longer the only identifying piece of information.
As a person with modest theoretical knowledge and low practical experience in the matter (read: this might be an utterly bullshit idea), I kind of want to make a “Bluetooth shotgun” that responds to any AWK packets with a slew of spoofed info.
If such a thing were possible, I would then make it also listen for responses, and log them with a geolocation. I would then spoof those responses every time an awk was received around that area. (This is because nonsense data can be filtered to reveal just the real responses - my device(s), but inaccurate real data would destroy the value of the surveillance.)
Editing to add - lots of considerations. I wouldn’t want to just attack random people’s home equipment that’s seeking to pair. Maybe it only blasts out a bunch of responses when it’s an undirected advertisement or the advertisement has a MAC that corresponds to spying companies,
This is 2026 and we are still promoting this myth
This is a shitpost sir.
Some people actually believe it. I had a friend do it this week because of the trend.
It might work at night when flashes and such are used, it won't do anything during the day. It would also require frequent reapplication.
You'd be better off using a sbc to design a tracking system that can identify flock camera lenses and blast them with a green laser pointer, a laser pointer which of course isn't in any way driven beyond design parameters because that would be illegal.
Anything that can reliably hold a laser on a small camera lens when mounted to a moving vehicle, or even identify cameras in the first place, is Lockheed Martin-level stuff, this is crazy talk. Just mount a Trophy ADS to my Subaru real quick.
And take off your damn bumper stickers
Technically you can install infrared LEDs to shine on your license plate to wash out the license plate

top 50 comments