top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 175 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

This police state surveillance apparatus is really quite embarrassing if they have to appeal to the public instead of using the very thing designed for total surveillance that was involved in the incident.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    announcing... Flock's new camera security system (another camera pointed at the first camera to watch for people breaking it)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    okay, but then who watches the public watching flock camera watcher flock cameras?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Another flock camera of course

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • They only have to appeal to the public to provide cover for what they can really do. They'll just search men in the area whose phones weren't being used or moved during this incident (assuming the guy was smart enough to not bring his phone with him, who knows) and filter by men who make anti-surveillance posts on social media and match the limited physical description available here. Probably wouldn't be more than a few hits that match.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 85 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    Just look at that physique: that's clearly Donald Trump!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    What!? Clearly that’s John Barron

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 64 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    Remember kids. When you see someone damage a flock camera.. no you didn't..

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    I'm blind in both eyes. I can't even see this comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

    I'm not blind, I imbibed an excessive amount of whatever thc adjacent substance is legal in my state so my memory is not accurate nor admissable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago

    Here's your F bud. Smoke some real bud soon! I'm smoking my pen rn for you.

    Also its not legal, just medical, in my state. I have a friend who picks up from dispensaries for me, most people have a hook up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Looks like Stephan Miller to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 39 points 4 weeks ago
    [–] 34 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Slender body, sneaky as fuck, that's obviousl Mark Zuckerberg.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 4 weeks ago

    Based hero.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 19 points 4 weeks ago

    Idk but he can hold me in his beatlejuice arms while the world burns down around us

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 4 weeks ago

    That’s fuking Putin all the way!!

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    That guy fumbled hard by wearing distinctive clothing, which can potentially be recovered by law enforcement and presented as evidence in a trial. I hope any future Flock vandals reading this do the same thing so they get caught.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Hope he burned the shoes and striped shirt.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 4 weeks ago*

    Can confirm, that's Ben Dog alright. In fact I overheard him and Kariv Levin at Coachella talking about how much they both hate Flock cameras. I remember Netanyahu laughed and said, "Dude they're totally easy to fuck up!"

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [+] 11 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago

    Damn if only they had a picture. I'm curious who's doing a public service

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago

    All I see is a side walk

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago

    can confirm

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago

    I am commenting this from now on on all "we're looking for flock bandit" posts

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

    I guess I'm going to die beating this dead horse, but Flock cameras are just regular video security cameras and feed back to a cloud AI platform. If you go to their homepage right this minute you will see that not one single example of their camera views shows a license plate read, but several do show the platform identifying people instead.

    EDIT: I think I am giving the wrong impression. These are domestic surveillance tools and it's my belief these should be considered unconstitutional. I'm merely stating that these are not ONLY license plate readers (LPR's), they are full cameras.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Are not the number plate IDs just a stepping stone to tracking people? So apart from letting us know how correct you are, who cares? This is mass surveillance. We are aware. It’s why we’re in this group.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago

    Holy Shit it's Donald Trump!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago

    Didn't know that big man Ben N was an anarchist, that explains a lot!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    We can put on masks too

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    I don't know who specifically but that's one of the kids from the farm on the other side of the fence in my backyard.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago*

    It's obviously the Hamburglar

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›