Huh, I guess it's TACO Thursday unfortunately.

all 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 82 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I hope BBC goes after him regardless. Bring it all out in the open on that loser rapist flesh rot

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    They're almost certainly going to go after him for legal fees and his only defense would be that he believed there was actual harm which would also require release of his finances. He kinda fucked himself if they want to push it at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    If there is no detriment for the attempt, the legal system is a tool of aggression, not justice. A claimed was made and the investigation should be seen to it's conclusion.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 49 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    He can't handle anything because he's a moron. He probably had a dozen people tell him this was a bad idea.

    As usual, the primary intention was never necessarily to win, only to intimidate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Ha no. Fuck that, he don't get taco out of this. Can BBC counter sue now? How do we get this discovery rolling?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    BBC already filed a motion to oppose Trump's filing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    The judge who gets to decide if motions stay or not was appointed by Trump during his first term.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    A bunch of Trump appointed judges have ruled against him.

    I'd put them as more lawful evil, and less likely to be fans of Trump's chaotic evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    The telegraph is a Conservative Newspaper with a paywall. The Guardian is a more "centre left"/progressive newspaper (pro universal healthcare, facts matter etc) and it doesn't have a paywall, it has a cancelable "please consider subscribing".

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/06/trump-bbc-libel-lawsuit

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago*

    Sorry, I see that as a cookie wall, not a pay wall.

    So yes, you have to accept cookies to read the article, but you don't have to give them your credit card info, and American sites just set cookies anyway.

    You should use a browser that lets you burn tabs' cookies if you're worried about it. (That's what I do.) Alternatively get an ad blocker. My browser does its own ad blocking. It lets "sponsored" articles through, and similarly spoken ads included by the author in podcasts and videos but I don't see Google's ads on YouTube with it.

    Browser fingerprinting is real and google and other advertisers track you whether you allow cookies or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 2 months ago

    "They caused me financial harm!"

    "Ok show us your financials so we can determine how much."

    "Oh... uh... you wanna see my totally legit financials?? Uhhh nevermind i take it back."

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 2 months ago

    Ha! Cornered the POS.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    Oh, did the subpoenas suddenly get too real? Guess turning over his books on all his corruption schemes, I mean, businesses, wasn't to his taste.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    What? I didn't know it was Taco Tuesday!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    TACO Thursday! Close enough?

    Edit: Woops! That's the name of the post. My bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, i didn't read the OP before commenting too. Oops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    BBC1, BBC2, BBC3, BBC4, BBC5, BBC6, BBC7, BBC Heaven!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Pathetic loser. What an embarrassment.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Should he have business?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I couldn't figure out how to make a BBC joke without sounding racist so I'll just say fuck Trump.

  • source