top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 210 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

I have never understood the need to comment on porn of any kind.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 161 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    You probably also guessed that the stripper isn't actually attracted to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 95 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 52 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Sorry you had to find out this way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    But the escort actually likes me, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 44 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I've seen some funny comments, but the ones that are like "ur so hot" are baffling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    It's a parasocial dopamine hit. It's like commenting on a Twitch stream. There's a fantasy that they'll notice and reply to you, and suddenly you'll be having a conversation with a famous attractive person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 121 points 3 weeks ago* (6 children)

    Back in 2023, we reported on AI-generated influencers that were pulling thousands of reactions per thirst trap on Instagram.

    Anything but the metric system!

    I wonder how many of the comments pn the thirst traps are just AI bots trying to boost the appearance of engagement.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 116 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

    Fucking duh. They also can't tell they are being gaslit by bots on all their stupid conservative pages. Boomers are fucking stupid.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

    Kinda wishin I knew what a thirst trap was..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 82 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)
    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 67 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    hornyposting on main must be one of these elusive family values then i guess

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 46 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    And it'll happen to you, too!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 41 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    At some point you have to stop blaming the algorithm: If you’re posting »good morning beautiful« under an image where the hands have six fingers and the background melts into itself, the problem isn’t cutting edge AI. Basic digital literacy is part of living online, regardless of your age.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    I looked at some of the videos. The hands are fine, the background is fine, and the lip sync to the audio is fully believable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    Are we sure all these boomers leaving comments aren’t also bots on Facebook?

    They might be there to get the thirst traps traction to get out on all the old creeper’s algorithms in the first place.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Boomers think supernatural creatures control our fate. Why would we expect them to be capable of determining fiction from reality?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 weeks ago

    They've been doing it long before AI images too. Most photoshops got them too.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    "thirst traps" "simps"? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    yea, they got no chill for yassified NPCs, YKWIM, tots delulu. I guess some sigmas simp 4 sludge, rather be mewing all day, no cap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Why? I don't understand this comment. Are you unfamiliar with these terms?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Particularly that they've made their way into a general media article and title without any effort to define them, as if they are now a common part of the average persons lexicon, and not just cringy internet slang.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    The solution? Flood Facebook with AI generated boomers and let the bot system implode and take facebook down with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

    I ran into a Discord where the sole topic was running hot girl "AI influencers" on Instagram. Literally hundreds of thousands of people thirsted over them, and the operaters made real money.

    Their systems were pretty sophisticated. The whole process is automated; LLMs write the posts and do sexy DMs, imagegen and videogen models and such do the sexy images and videos, controlnet keeps the look consistent-enough between media. LLM agents press all the buttons. I think there may have even been OnlyFans stuff.

    So a single operator could run dozens of bots.

    ...It's not hard for these models, either. DMs and short Insta posts are stupidly simple language, and media of sexy people in clothes, doing insta-style poses, probably makes up most of the image/video model training corpus.

    I think there was some engagement farming with other bots, of course, but it would snowball and turn organic. Real Instagram users were thirsting over these bots.


    ...It got me thinking.

    Is it really that different from a parasocial relationship with a "real" influencer?

    I mean, functionally, its exactly the same. The users can't even tell the difference.


    I posit that the whole "thirst" influencer system was broken and exploitive to everyone involved, except Facebook.

    It was fucked up to begin with.

    AI just made it more obvious to onlookers. It destroyed the pretense that any of it was "real."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    Well, in a way most of the AI hype (like that you can easily replace office workers with chatbots or that software developers will become 10x more efficient and consequently you can fire 90% of your workforce) are a thirst trap for CEOs.

    A bit like selling candy with crack on the schoolground of a primary school....

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago

    The title made me think they meant that they don't believe AI thirst traps are real, as in "there's no ai generated thirst traps" and not "the thing you're thirsting over is AI generated." 🫪

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

    I mean most of the influencer bullshit is artificial engagement anyway. People playing a role to entertain, gain attention, make money. If you look at porn comments, they are all dumb so it wouldn't surprise me that the boomers leaving comments are similarly dumb "roleplaying", knowing that this is just a fantasy sharing between gooners. They might simply not care if it's real or not.

    Personally I don't get it, but whatever.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (3 children)

    I think the bigger issue is 65+ guys perving on girls young enough to be their daughters. Old guys who think they are still 25 and have game.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I watched the three video clips and would not have initially guessed the leotard gymnast and the mechanic are generated. The sad gymnast looks a little plastic.

    What actually looks fake in the mechanic video after a couple loops is the valve notches on the pistons, which are rotated from the correct orientation, and overlapping in a way that the laws of physics would not support.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›