I think this is my new favorite comic strip.
It's just so good. It hits all my buttons. 10/10
I think this is my new favorite comic strip.
It's just so good. It hits all my buttons. 10/10
I'm guessing it's trying to make fun of fissile atoms. But I see two problems with this.
And yes, I've been hugely popular at both parties I've attended.
And yes, I've been hugely popular at both parties I've attended.
Well obviously! Everybody here can see you have at LEAST two shit-hot science facts just ready to go when the house ain't bumping.
Not all heroes wear capes. Some stick with lab coats.
both parties
Mr. King of the castle over here being invited to two parties, no need to brag.
Probably so cool he got invited to, and attended, both on the same day. Fuck this guy.
Hello T. Folse Nuclear
Plus, it wouldn't actually come to the splitting because the real owner of the atom would object.
yeah, people who own atoms are real stingy with them
Its a c section comic, they aren't known for scientific accuracy......
Seriously what good would half a baby be
It'd be way way grosser than a regular baby for one thing
pies?
Is this based off an allegory?
Yeah, it's biblical.
The abbreviated story is that two women were both claiming a baby as theirs, and King Solomon had to make a judgement. He suggested the only fair way was to split the baby in two, knowing the real mom would give up her claim to prevent that from happening. One woman said split it, the real mom retracted her claim, and Solomon gave the baby to the real mom.
The joke here is that they split an atom instead of a baby.
Would splitting one single atom in a non dense environment start a nuclear chain reaction? And why do I ask such questions when it's simply a cartoon to snicker about?
no, there are lots of atoms splitting inside your body every second.
a single U-235 atom's fission, releasing ~200MeV, (~30 picojoules), in ideal circumstances could maybe nudge a very small fine grain of sand (~ micrograms) enough to see movement (small fraction of a millimetre) under a microscope .
It takes months of refining to make nuclear fuel that's suitable for sustaining a chain reaction.
it's an interesting question, I'm glad I did the research checking that the orders of magnitude match!
A nuclear chain reaction can only be sustained through very specific molecules that have the ability to undergo fission and release neutrons while they do. Those released neutrons then need to interact with new fissile molecules that surround the first one.
The chain reaction also requires that there are enough of those molecules and that they are packed closely enough together, so the reaction doesn’t fizzle (no pun intended) out.
That only happens in an environment like enriched uranium, which is uranium with an artificially high percentage of U-235 that doesn’t occur naturally –at least not anymore.
Was that not Albert Einstein’s fear regarding the bomb? That Earth’s atmosphere would simply ignite when exposed to the initial reaction?
I think our sitting here, snickering at a comic about a biblical nuclear explosion, is proof that it wouldn’t happen.
i believe there was some early speculation that the unprecedented temperature of the Trinity test might ignite the atmosphere, somehow making the nitrogen burn, but that would be a chemical reaction, not a nuclear reaction.
I thought he was trying to add bubbles to beer
Weirdly enough this is also Elder Scrolls lore somehow
You haven't experienced this lore until you heard it in the original Klingon.
It’s the only way to be sure.
Is this for sure not ai?
There's an author attribution and website right on it, you're free to look into it if you're concerned.
Impressive AI for 2018.
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
😇 Be Nice!
🏘️ Community Standards
🧬 Keep it Real
📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due
📋 Post Formatting
📬 Post Frequency/SPAM
🏴☠️ Internationalization (i18n)
Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]🍿 Moderation
The following artists are banned from the community.
It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.
Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.
When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:
Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)