1029

As CBS News Atlanta previously reported, more than one in four single-family rental homes in metro Atlanta are owned by large corporate investors — more than 72,000 homes — giving the region one of the highest concentrations of institutional ownership anywhere in the United States.

Housing advocates have argued that those companies can outbid families with cash offers, reducing the number of homes available to first-time buyers while contributing to higher home prices and rents.

Warnock has repeatedly cited those trends in pushing the legislation, saying corporate investors have increasingly treated homes as financial assets instead of places for families to live.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 16 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

This does absolutely nothing. As others pointed out, they'll just create new shells. Even if they lowered prices somehow it would be pointless. There is no money or jobs anymore.

Obligatory:

[-] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago

So for every 350 homes they make a new LLC or shell company.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

You didn't expect this to actually fix the problem did you? Sorry, too much money to be made.

[-] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I mean any progress is a step in the right direction. It just seems that these days are Democrats are very performative. Most of their legislation has no teeth and is just for show. Enforcement of any policies is basically none.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Sounds about right, most policies are passed on their performative aspects. When you really sit down and read the law you often find the performative reason that was cited isn't even true.

[-] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Unfortunately both sides do something similar, It seems that modern legislative practices lead to incredibly broad and poorly written policy that can be interpreted and almost any direction. I think it’s like that by design. But it’s so watered down and meaningless that it’s just a feel good title with a bunch of bullshit stuffed into it.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Yes, I do believe this is done on purpose. This combined with shitty concepts like omnibus bills with riders ensures policy gets passed that should have never seen the light of the day.

[-] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I honestly can’t believe how much bullshit they stuff into the budget every year. I guess it’s just been accepted that every must pass tight Bill has to be stuffed chock full of the worst most vile stupid legislation ever. No politician wants to risk their career election campaign trying to pass some dystopian corporate bootlicker policies. So they just shove it every budget bill hoping that no one will read the thousands of pages to catch their loopholes.

[-] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 0 points 9 hours ago

*always performative. There's a reason schumers name is on Epstein's blackmail list.

[-] suitmangray@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

This won't do anything people who read actual news know the private equity is a convenient boogeyman hiding the refusal of state government to do their job an remove local control and mandate zoning reform and more housing of all types and sizes. Also it's 2026 and people are still posting tv news outlets to the internet.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 22 points 16 hours ago

Are they stripping them of the ones they already have?

[-] ghen@sh.itjust.works 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Hopefully they're just being taxed at increased rates that make profit unviable and allows them to unload the houses normally. I don't really know how the legislation works though.

[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

This solution makes sense. They need to phase out the existing rules properly, no matter how wrong they were to begin with.

Tax them from 10% til 100% over 5 years, and let them sell off as they go through that time spand maybe?

[-] jaykrown@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

It's a great way to get younger people to stop caring when they can't actually afford to own anything. This is a step in the correct direction, corporate gatekeeping needs to end, we need to give people opportunities to own. If someone rents, borrows, and leases their entire life, why would they care if it all goes to shit?

[-] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 2 points 9 hours ago

And let's not forget: the younger people of today are the older people of tomorrow. Except for those who are handed things due to generational wealth, we're looking at an extremely large contingent of the country (world?) which will own nothing. Perhaps the largest ever such contingent. Does not seem like a sustainable situation over any extended term.

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

Finally! I've watched these fucking companies buy up every house in my neighborhood that came up for sale. IMO when this trend started was when the people's dream of ever owning a home got destroyed. Warnock for President?

[-] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

We’ve had low interest rates propping up the stock market and speculative bubbles for far too long. This is why there has been too much cheap capital chasing returns over the last decade.

It’s a bubble of its own which we are starting to see pop in a number of sectors. (Private Equity firms and banks starting to show signs of strain, zombie businesses going under, AI bubble running out of capital sources and now tapping retail investors, crypto crash, etc.)

However this president is intent on getting us to 0% interest rates which will reverse that progress. Once the asset class can tap into essentially free money all of this progress will be undone.

If PE can get free capital every 7 years and sit on an appreciating asset while making renters pay for it, they will. If PE has to refinance that asset every 7 years at 7% or 8% interest suddenly the math doesn’t work especially in a slumping housing market.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 14 hours ago

Can we apply that to farms too? If you aren't actually farming, whether you have a corporation or not, you can't buy farmland. Sorry, JD.

[-] Bluewing@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago

If Trump didn't veto it, there must be some loopholes large enough to drive a battleship through.....

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago

Senate vote was 85-5

Ron Johnson of Wisconsin Mike Lee of Utah Rand Paul of Kentucky Rick Scott of Florida Tommy Tuberville of Alabama

Guessing Trump knew it would be a losing battle to veto it. Also, it should make him look better with him having to do nothing but stay out of the way

[-] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Rick Scott voting against his constituency?

Shocker.

- A Floridian, speaking sarcastically

[-] RBWells@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Fuck Rick Scott to hell and back. He is in it for the $$$ and nothing else, does not give even one fuck about the people of Florida. I cannot imagine voting for him, such a high level scammer.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Damn, fuck Russian Ron Johnson. The democrats really left Barnes out to dry against Ron Johnson and he ran an awful campaign. It still blows my mind that the same election elected Democrat Evers for governor and Ron Johnson. What a wild split ticket.

[-] GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

It sure would be cool if Ron Johnson would go grab a drink with Lady G and Mitchy boy. I truly hate that man.

[-] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago

it was also an opportunity for everyone to kumbayah and get some good press on addressing affordability

[-] TaeKwonDoh@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

Finally some good news!

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 22 points 21 hours ago

Good! Those fucking passive income vultures.

[-] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago

Are private equity firms, as defined in the bill, actually buying homes? Or is the private entity type doing that, not classified as an equity firm?

Rich people have nothing to do with their stolen money but buy up assets. It's a runaway disaster for everyone. The rich are pricing people out of being alive and we act like we can't do anything about it. At some point, perhaps gen Alpha, will have to do something about it or simply die.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

Now pair with legislation that says all existing corporate owned properties are taxed at 100% of any revenue derived from ownership of those properties

[-] Master167@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago

I'd start with taxing 100% property taxes of empty properties as a logical next step.

[-] Paranomaly@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago

I get where you're coming from and an for the sentiment, but that will need at least some sort of caveat or having to sell the house of a lost family member will be become very dangerous.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

Or buying a foreclosure and making it livable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I knew he'd do some good. :) I was hopeful when Georgia elected him. That hope wasn't misplaced.

That’s genuinely fantastic news.

The skeptic, pessimistic part of me now wants to know how BlackRock et al will get around this with creative corporate and financial shell games, because I’m absolutely sure they will try to do just that.

[-] Legonatic@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

An important distinction here is that BlackRock is not a PE firm. They are an asset management company. Now, that's not to say they're not in the business of buying up homes, just that they're not PE. Blackstone is the PE firm which has been buying up single family homes. They're different companies. Both evil though.

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It's actually not bad, prevents shell games, but still allows them to keep properties they already own and allows up to 350 new properties larger than single family.

A potential hack would be offering loans to businesses to buy 350, and if theyvreally want to push the limits they can try to buy the smaller companies which just so happens to transfer their properties.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 23 points 1 day ago

how bout ban them in general, since they are ruining alot of companies.

[-] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

Why are we still linking to CBS news? Can't trust that shit.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
1029 points (99.4% liked)

Uplifting News

19346 readers
1513 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS