all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 62 points 2 months ago (12 children)

What's worse is the reverse and it happens more often: Posting a job and then hiring from outside rather than promoting from within.

Because no manager wants to lose their low paid competent worker. So instead they hire the outside person for the senior position.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    Yep. At one point my company tried to hire an architect from outside to lead our engineering team. Our software is very complicated, even ignoring the codebase and only looking at the business use cases. It takes years before people become somewhat familiar with it.

    That guy noped out after three months and literally gave the product's complexity as the main reason. Complete waste of money.

    They eventually promoted one of our senior devs instead and he absolutely killed it. Modernized much of the codebase and dev processes because we were still acting like a startup at the time. It's insane they just didn't go with him from the beginning. He saved the company many millions of dollars that will never show up on a bean counter's spreadsheet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    My leading hypothesis is "management is stupid". It explains a lot of this sort of thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago*

    Management lives in a different reality. I've never worked in a back office environment, but everywhere I have worked even "hands on" middle and upper management tends to stay in their bubble. On the rare occasion they do site visits there's plenty of warning, so store managers scrimp on labor during the leadup and then overstaff relative to normal conditions to make sure everything looks perfect. It is very difficult for middle management and up to get a clear picture of what is actually happening because there's no incentive to be honest. Being honest actually gets you punished, because when everyone else lies honesty makes you look incompetent.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I worked at a shitty movie theatre for years and was promised an assistant general manager position - as in, showed my name tag with the position. Learned both front and back of house, worked literal 100 hour weeks (no OT, no benefits because “entertainment industry.”

    Instead, they hired a random sociopathic woman who was lazy and did nothing at all. Not only verbally abusive, but also physically assaulted me. Absolutely tanked morale and they started hemorrhaging employees.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    I recently applied for a management role in another organizational unit. My role has considerable overlap with that work area. They decided to only consider external candidates after the first round of interviews.

    They settled on someone that doesn’t really have relatable experience. I’ve had to train them on so many things. It’s just demoralizing.

    A project I did is getting written up in a national (industry) publication soon. It represents the type of work that I interviewed for.
    But fuck me, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 53 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    in government positions, search is sometimes mandated.

    i once competed for a job for which i was the current temporary contractor, and they asked me to write the job description.

    somehow i got the job. does that count?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    I can see how thst's kind of productive assuming they needed a template for the job description so they could use it in future if you quit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I used to work for a professional theater and per equity rules we were required to hold auditions in NYC for three days to cast a full time resident actor. About 200 people applied. Some flew in from CA, AZ and FL. Many others drove or took a four hour train ride in to audition. I was told to just go and enjoy the process because the position was already filled by someone who was regularly doing extra work for us. He didn't even audition.

    The bishop of a cathedral once told me how he was hiring a new music director and had over 50 resumes on his desk to peruse. An applicant knocked on his door saying he was interested in the job. The bishop looked at the applicant, looked at the pile, looked at the applicant and hired him on the spot. He was there for 50 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Not to sound like a boomer, but please god, tell me in-person hiring is back. I desperately need to get out of a toxic situation, and I shit you not, have applied to hundreds of listings without a single reply.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I literally saw a job on LinkedIn that started with “Must have 30+ years experience…”, then gave a highly specific laundry list of requirements and was only open for 3 days. It was obvious that was a mandated post for an internal promotion they were doing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    For those wondering, this literally happens in the corporate world where for whatever reason, there are either rules or laws that require other candidates be vetted even when you're promoting from within. I've seen it first hand more than once.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    Sometimes management already has someone in mind for a job but corporate policy is it must be posted. Hiring is always a risk and people will try and derisk by hiring a known quantity but for those who don't know this already they are going through the already arduous task of applying for something they were never going to get.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago

    ...and then lays off 10-20% of the workforce, followed by posting some more ghost openings to make the shareholders comfortable

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago*

    They've already selected the boss' incompetent child for the position. Of course it's in management.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    not available, because they internally hired but dint want to seem discriminatory, or to game government tax schemes for hiring people, they are usually super specific to the point you cant get that kind of skills experience anywhere else. even LAB tech positions are like this, i highly suspect this was meant to hire visa holders, by the amount of "tasks" they want people to do.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    7 rounds of interviews. Over 3 months of calendar time to accommodate everyone's schedules and finally a two week pause in process as it carried into holiday.

    "So everyone agreed that you would be a great fit for the role and that you deserve a place here at [Huge company], but It came down to you and one other candidate who was internal, the difference ended up being his company experience"

    Cool.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Those application fees are a source of revenue for the company!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Not sure about this situation but I know my company interviews for jobs in order to get redundancy picks. Interviewed someone for a position that had already been hired for, then three weeks before they job was supposed to start the guy phoned and said he wasn't going to continue with the company for the position. The person that was interviewed late got a call back and hired.

    We hire for a short term seasonal job and people screw us over all the time by accepting the job and then continuing to look for a better one and bailing at the last minute, so we have to interview a lot of people as backup options. Had three people bail last minute this year, one of which we didn't have enough time to re-hire for and had no backups so now we have to try and cover it on top of our normal duties which is a big strain.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    seems pretty common, they mightve had other interviews with better offers at the same time, probably went for the better offer than your company.

    there is an offchance that some applicants are cherry picking which they apply to multiple jobs, get one call back and then bail because they were hoping for something else to come along and applied to your job as a placeholder, eventhough other jobs having responded to them yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    No all three accepted offer, signed employment letter, went through a certification test that's required for the work and cost the company $100. Then 2-3 weeks before the start date they say they got a better job.

    We hire early to make sure certification can get done, which is why there's a lag before start date. It's an outdoor seasonal summer job usually university students.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Data mining CVs, resume,s and letters. Selling it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    You should lick their shoes and thank them for giving you a chance of interview.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    As far as people I want to violate most, HR of Spectrum is top of the list. They fired me for using the bathroom of my preferred gender. Not technically. Technically, I used the "wrong" bathroom before being grilled for hours on end by HR and security to be let off on a technicality they forced in skillful manner. Y'know, they forced me to contradict myself on my interview when it was a bullshit question. Still got fired. I'll molest HR til the end of days because of that, because I know they're fucking people harder than me.

  • source
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Oh no I'm serious replying to a meme

    Obviously this happens a lot but people get big mad at unions because they think this is happening and it isn't necessarily.

    The job may be posted internally and externally at the same time. All internal candidates who apply must be assessed first and replied to in order of what union they belong to depending on the job. If can take a long time because people kind of just apply to everything the same way you do as an external candidate.

    Once they are all excluded then HR releases the external applicants for review. At no point are they compared with each other. Not all qualified candidates are contacted because there are probably dozens of them, so maybe the top 5 or so will be invited for the evaluation.

    It's shitty that there are people who don't have work, but I get grumpy when people yell NEPOTISM and other things. If we wanted to hire an internal candidate unethically we could and it wouldn't get posted externally. If we knew there were wrong internal candidates and we were doing things by the book we would post internal only. No one wants to deal with HR to get things posted externally, I promise.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    No one wants to deal with HR to get things posted externally, I promise.

    Except, you know, that's a lie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    “Ghost jobs are actually not scams. They’re from real companies, but they are openings that don’t actually exist,”

    Lol, wat?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    In other words they're not employment scams whose goal is to get your money.

    They are 'scams' in the fact they're not real jobs, they are essentially stealing your data under false pretenses, but because capital owns the western world, not people, media that likes not spending its entire revenue in court can't legally call that a scam.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -10 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    I mean, technically they didn't make anyone apply...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    They didn't make them apply.

    They made them apply FOR A POSITION THAT WASNT ACTUALLY AVAILABLE.

    yw

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    But it was available. Just internally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    So it wasn't actually available.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments