What makes this soldier "NATO backed"?
post
You mean a Zionist Nazi.
Industry standard thinks that nato, the organization, is supporting Israel. While many nato countries do, its disingenuous to say "nato", but that's how they frame it
Interestingly, to me, Israel exists directly after the events of WW2 because of said members and Stalin's Russia, all of whom did not care one bit about the region's current inhabitants but didn't want to accept millions of Jews into their countries.
NATO was formed later on as a check to the USSR, which placed Israel in the first world because of pro capitalism interests. That's neither here nor there, though, as Netanyahu has had very a positive relationship with Putin (with it decreasing a little recently after the attacks on ally Iran). Who do you think sells Israel the most oil?
What's up with that fancy "NATO backed zionist" nickname? Why not 'israeli' or atleast 'idf'?
I know, one the one hand blaming NATO sounds like Russian propaganda, but on the other hand not blaming NATO puts the blame on Israel alone. On another hand(?!?) is it really NATO's fault? It's a clumsy way to refer to the member states, and it's not NATO that is supporting Israel, it's its members.
But your question was why not blame the Zionists, and IMO that's because Israel wouldn't be able to do this, if it wasn't for western politicians being afraid of being label antisemitic. Shifting focus to a broader perspective, and making sure people remember this, can potentially make people pressure their elected representatives shift their stance on Israel.
Don't forget about us Australian's, we're not part of NATO but we still back these fucking ghouls.
Look at this horrible thing Israel did! Anyhow, that's why Spain should stop defending itself from Russia.
top 50 comments