61
submitted 5 days ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/linux@programming.dev
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] themoken@startrek.website 21 points 5 days ago

So, the answer to the question “Can Linux directly host another Unix-like operating system’s binary interface?” at the moment is “partly, experimentally, and impressively.”

As if there was any question on that? You can have Linux "handle" Windows PE binaries by telling it to invoke wine, dealing with a Unix-like scenario is a much lower bar.

The question is who is this useful for? FreeBSD has the Linux compatibility layer because it's playing catch up to Linux, but the Venn diagram of stuff FreeBSD can do but Linux can't is tiny, especially if extra special kernel feature stuff is stubbed.

Can anyone name a project that is BSD first, doesn't rely on BSD kernel features, doesn't have a native Linux port, and isn't a distro tool?

[-] lemmyng@piefed.ca 12 points 5 days ago

The question is who is this useful for?

Anyone wanting to run FreeBSD services in OCI containers on a Linux host.

[-] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 10 points 5 days ago

pf but that needs BSD kernel features..

this just looks like a fun project. not everything has to be actually meaningful for production usage

[-] mmmm@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I've read about people that switched to freebsd purely because of jails or zfs.

[-] Yoddel_Hickory@piefed.ca 9 points 5 days ago

that doesn't rely on kernel features

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
61 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

14257 readers
419 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS