Reminds me of this response from TPB:

Reminds me of this response from TPB:

Byrne also showed off the email response he sent to the regulator. “You want money, huh? Come get it,” he started, with an AI hamster wearing a Thug Life hate being surronded by mountains of dollar bills.
Was this written by AI or did they just not proof-read it for errors?
platiff
Given that this is quoting the lawyer, I can't tell if the lawyer typoed "plaintiff" or if the author of this article did. Given the other errors outside of the quote and lack of a "[sic]", I'm inclined to blame the article author, but...
AI usually doesn't make silly spelling mistakes like that.
It'll just lie and gaslight you instead.
Expecting overseas companies to abide by your laws is quite bizarre, just block them in the UK and move on.
No infrastructure for having the British government blacklist sites today. You'd need a British version of what China and Russia run today. Could be that they'll wind up adding it.
They'll tell the ISPs to block 4chan's IP addresses. It's what they've done with tpb and others. Next they're coming for VPNs under the whole "won't somebody think of the children" play.
Blocking the UK isn't enough to get them off your back. They'll claim that if your website is still accessible via VPN to someone in the UK then you're still subject to their laws.
How are you supposed to know where they're coming from, that's the whole point of a VPN.
The attorney's blog on the subject is an entertaining read:
It's a shame he stopped publishing his words to his own blog and just started linking Xitter posts instead. Can't read 2/3rds of it without making an account - fuck that.
/edit. I decided to at least voice that opinion to him via the contact form on his blog:

Who knows, maybe he'll improve that aspect.
The additional AI hamsters were a threat in 4Chan’s previous response, as they promised to use an “even larger rodent” next time around.
See, I would have expected a capybara or something, rather than a higher-res hamster.
EDIT: looks at actual image Oh, I see. It's like, a Kaiju hamster. Dwarfing the buildings it's sitting near.
As 4Chan has no assets in the United Kingdom (given that it has no connection to the United Kingdom), that would require you to show up in a US court as a platiff
I think that the way this works is that first the British government has to go to a British court and secure a ruling against 4Chan and then go to a US court and prove to it that 4Chan is under British jurisdiction to get that ruling enforced by a US court. As an aside, I think I'd be careful if I were 4Chan
there are things that they can do that are not immediately obvious, like targeted advertising aimed at Brits, that might place them under British jurisdiction in the eyes of US courts. I also dunno about accepting donations from Brits. But if they rigorously kept their nose clean, then I agree
it's very much possible that a US court would rule that there is no British jurisdiction.
However, I do have to say that I think that the prospect of Ofcom arguing the matter in front of a serious-looking judge in a British court, horsehair wig and all, while presenting material from, say, /d/ (NSFW), and having said judge gravely contemplate it and British law seems like it'd be sound fodder for a comedy skit.
Also, the government probably needs to hit a threshold of trying to get them to comply before they can go to the British court and get them blocked in the UK.
Watching the British self destruct, especially with the biggest one being Brexit, continues to show how completely out of touch they are.
Of all the ways and places I might have expected resistance to erosion of our freedoms, I never could have guessed it would be 4chan. Good on you, anon.
4chan is a cia honeypot which is part of why it became super right wing and why /pol/ started after moot met with Epstein. At a minimum they keep logs for weeks and in certain cases indefinitely
It doesn’t allow VPNs and collects user data. To other users you’re anonymous. Otherwise the site is tracking you like any other.
1750 “partners”???????
They really value your privacy though. They've extensively vetted each and every one of them. Only the bestest of friends get to gorge on your data!
I don't understand how the data broker market works. There are thousands and thousands of these companies all selling the same data they hold on you. Surely if all 1750 of them gather the same stuff it would become essentially worthless?
I believe the key is data aggregators. The first roun of sales is to an aggregator. They Hoover up everything to create a connected dossier on everyone, also including public sources of information, to “add value”. Then the entire internet buys it
But maybe not directly. A lot of the time the entire internet is buying a list that meets demographic criteria. “Give me a list of validated email addresses that have used Lemmy, posted about tpb , and use a vpn based in another country”
I will never not love 4chan
4chan is probably the world’s largest distributor of revenge porn.
ETA: what an amazing website

Likely second behind Twitter.
My guess is that Twitter is both number one in CP (Grok) and revenge porn.
Does Twitter have the “WWYD” threads? 4channers post pictures of women - could be girlfriends, could be strangers - and ask for detailed descriptions of how they should be raped and murdered?
There’s another regular thread where they talk about cannibalizing the random women they post photos of.
all 49 comments