Who would have guessed that importing overpriced fossil fuels is bad?
๐ฎ
Who would have guessed that importing overpriced fossil fuels is bad?
๐ฎ
Yes, but it's important imo that Europe produces heat pumps and components itself rather than importing it from countries like China. It wouldn't make sense to replace dependence from Russian fossil fuels by dependence on Chinese technology.
There is a bit of a difference there, though.
If European-Russian relations sour, the fossil fuel supply can be cut off and you're just fucked by that.
If European-Chinese relations sour, the Chinese can cut off supply of new heat pumps, but all your existing heat pumps will still be there and will still work.
Losing fossil fuel supply is an immediate and urgent problem; losing heat pump supply is a much less pressing issue and leaves you much more time to spin up alternate supply lines.
Well, if the said heat pumps are connected to chinese servers over the internet so they can be remotely controlled...
Why would you connect your heat pump to the internet
Why do people connect their home security, thermostats, or refrigerators to the internet? Because theyโre designed, first and foremost, as data collectors. Users discover after the fact that they donโt actually own anything, and the company hides behind software licenses to maintain their control.
In every heat pump I've ever seen, internet connectivity is optional.
And even if you did connect it and the Chinese server told the thing to shut off ... I'm betting it's nothing a decent appliance/electronics technician couldn't undo by resetting the board. Or, in the very worst case scenario, the heat pumps would require replacement logic boards, but all the actual heating/cooling hardware could still be used once that board was replaced.
You don't burn a heat pump every time you use it. Not the same thing
important imo that Europe produces heat pumps and components itself rather than importing it from countries like China
Don't worry. We only sell our heat pump producers to the US.
Its becoming more common here in Central Europe, most new builds family houses have them.
They have a couple drawbacks, like the high upfront cost (in my country a mid-range pump can cost between 3-8K Euros) and they work best with well insulated buildings, but once its installed they can save a tons of money, especially when paired with solar panels or wind turbines.
For a flat I once had, to have 24 degrees I paid 2000 โฌ in just gas for one year. It may seem high, but it gets profitable pretty quickly.
Where would that be? My sister in Germany just got an offer for a heat pump+installation for 42k Euros in Germany.
In a modern build or something that is easy to insulate properly they're a great idea. Expensive here in the UK but still great.
But as @StealthLizardDrop@piefed.social already mentioned retrofitting to old housing stock (Eg. Victorian terraces) are an absolute ball ache.
Mini-splits are really not that hard. Run an electricity supply and punch two holes through the wall. Mount the units.
I get that, but in the UK they're so expensive for homeowners. The uptake isn't quick enough.
As someone who recently moved to the UK, how at they so expensive? The price for the unit isn't that bad, but I assume duct works to all rooms would be? Maybe I'm just not understanding apples to apples coming from the US.
Heat pumps in UK are mostly air to water and integrate into your central heating They do not offer cooling, so no need in ducting to every room.
UK problems are around retrofitting housing stock never designed with an idea of a unit outside. For example the logical place for me to place a heatpump is roughly more than 8m away from where the water tank would be. So you would have to run ducting outside of the house.
And thats after i took out a door and walled that in (with eventual upgrade to heatpump) to leave the space specifically for the heatpump.
So alot of the extra cost would be working around ducting it to the place where it integrates into existing heating system.
We tend not to have air-conditioning either, housing stock can suffer from condensation and mould easily here. As its old and never designed for modern standards. Mine is about 130 years old or so.
So all in all, its a right pain to do.
In the UK we have A LOT of safety regulations for these sorts of things. They were mostly EU rules that we kept after Brexit (not necessarily a bad thing), getting something approved takes time, development and money. Another issue is we have many MANY small terraced (lots of houses joined together in a row) houses that would struggle to fit a large heat pump and many of these houses are old, like 100 years + making modifications expensive. Until they're smaller and cheaper with better incentives I unfortunately just don't see us taking them up.
I don't understand why any of these factors, none of which seems specific for the UK but instead applicable to the entire EU, would make heat pumps more expensive in the UK compared to the EU.
Youโd think all new builds would have to have heat pumps and solar panels, thereby reducing demand.
Sadly, thatโs probably like 1% of housing stock.
Out of interest, just how expensive are they? I can get a minisplit heat pump installed on our house for about a 1000โฌ (higher end models are obviously more expensive) here in Finland. It requires a small-ish hole trough the wall for pipes/wires, but otherwise the installation is pretty easy.
We have one in the house and another in garage and both have already paid for themselves since I don't need to run electric radiators anymore. Newer models would be even more efficient, but as the current ones still work they're not the first thing on the long list of house maintenance.
Its around 3 to 5 thousand pounds and thats after a government grant.
That's pretty crazy, specially considering that UK doesn't require as arctic-proof pumps as we do here. The absolutely cheapest pump I can find right now is 199โฌ (without installation obviously). I wouldn't really recommend that, it's the cheapest piece of shit you can get. I have previous "cheap" model from that particular store in garage and efficiency on that drops dramatically when it's below -20C, but it does function even after several years.
Cheaper bosh/samsung/panasonic are around 900โฌ for the unit and full installation is around 500, but if you put some elbow grease there yourself it'll be around half of that.
What are we talking about here? The machine itself + installation? How many square meters are we talking about? I've checked recently and two splits for 30m^2 each (so 60m^2 total) would cost me about 1.5k and that's with the top, most efficient model.
I feel this is an almost dilberate choice by the government at this point. The credit you get for them is a really poor scheme and every government seems determined to avoid doing anything to assist retrofitting existing homes. Probably because trying to improve things sounds too much like communism to them.
Meanwhile in the Netherlands we are still terrified of air conditioning for whatever reason
What kills me if in America, especially in New England, is we still have tons of people, if not a majority a huge percentage, burning #2 heating oil during the winter. It used to be so cheap as to hardly think about filling the tank before winter, but it's almost as much as gasoline now. My thought is "how hard can it be to convert those burners to biofuel, either reclaimed vegetable oil like diesel or with a mix of ethanol from corn to lower the cost." Because if there's one thing America has the capacity to produce a shitload of, it's ethanol.
If somebody with a better grasp of the subject has an answer for that I would be very grateful.
We have just converted from a gas furnace to a heat pump. It took a day. Connected to the existing heating system (water radiators and under floor) and hot water pipes. I know you wanted an ethanol solution, however, the electricity route combined with solar cells (like we have) makes it cheap to run.
I'm back from the Internet with knowledge to share!
https://www.northeastbiodiesel.com/heating-with-biodiesel
So it does exist, requires no retrofit up to 20% biodiesel, and with minor retrofit can go to pure BD, but it congeals around 45ยฐf so some amount of petroleum as a stabilizer is required for winter heating. Apparently ethanol from corn does not produce more energy than is required to create it, but biodiesel already being partly made for another purpose and otherwise wasted brings its creation energy down a lot.
If I remember correctly, the issue with corn ethanol is the scale. It requires a lot of space and a lot of water.
Solar panels are energy wise a much more efficient use of the same area. They also don't require water or any kind of labour to harvest. Finally the consumption of electricity in heaters or cars is more efficient than burning ethanol.
I like your idea of using existing burners instead of replacing entire heat systems. Perhaps biogas produced by household and agricultural waste is a better option than growing corn for this purpose.
My parents installed geothermal heating in their house, that saved a shitload of electricity.
top 50 comments