52
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) by Novocirab@feddit.org to c/webdev@programming.dev

The analytics people didn’t even know where these users were coming from. Of course, your javascript-based analytics package doesn’t see the users you are bouncing because of javascript failures.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 7 hours ago

Nice! I find that governments mist not force their citizens to buy new devices, not require them to have a big tech account in order to use their services.

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 15 points 20 hours ago

form submissions and redirects took a while to explain to my colleagues

what

back to primary school for them i hope

[-] nykula@piefed.social 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Not the first time I'm reading this text, and I still don't get a lot of it. Their previous form was ASP-based, which is also server-rendered, so which developer practice exactly doubled the number of users? Doubled compared to what? Did the marketing department also get a boost at the same time, and the updated website got better advertising somewhere? How did 96% satisfaction get calculated earlier, if there were so many users whose needs were not met? Where does the "20MB of javascript before we even render a form" number come from? What does "global javascript states" mean, regarding their previous React replacement attempt, and why is it bad, because MobX singletons used to be an actually pleasant, maintainable pattern in my practice? Was the previous replacement attempt vibe-coded, and who made the decision to have developers do it like that? Given the choice of Astro as the platform, and the suggestion of Remix, what makes the developer so sure "it will still work 30 years from now", because these are much more complex targets than just React?

[-] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

It's not that difficult to understand, imho. If a site works properly more people will use it, and with more users the same percentage of people filling in the survey leads to a higher number overall. Just make functional sites and the users will come to it.

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 7 points 17 hours ago

there’s also tons of reasons changing a form can lead to higher completion rates. 200% isn’t uncommon, most forms are hot garbage, and not because of their underlying software architecture

[-] Novocirab@feddit.org 5 points 20 hours ago

Doubled compared to what?

This perhaps answers your question (although the length of the measurement intervals (before/after) is not specified):

When we launched, the number of people completing the form doubled.


How did 96% satisfaction get calculated earlier, if there were so many users whose needs were not met?

The 96% (or whatever the exact threshold is) seems to be a requirement imposed by law, so that it's probably measured through some external procedure:

Adding a lot of pressure, this was a regulated monopoly, and if their customer satisfaction dropped below 96% (if I remember correctly) it could result in millions of pounds in fines.

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
52 points (94.8% liked)

Web Development

5689 readers
289 users here now

Welcome to the web development community! This is a place to post, discuss, get help about, etc. anything related to web development

What is web development?

Web development is the process of creating websites or web applications

Rules/Guidelines

Related Communities

Wormhole

Some webdev blogsNot sure what to post in here? Want some web development related things to read?

Heres a couple blogs that have web development related content

CreditsIcon base by Delapouite under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS