this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1011 points (93.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21197 readers
165 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 181 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    I actually had more success getting old windows games to run in modern linux with wine than in modern windows.

    [–] [email protected] 104 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    The saying "the most stable ABI on Linux is win32" says that's also true for Linux software unfortunately

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 60 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

    Yea, there's a lot of (well deserved) shitting on Windows, but it's backwards compatibility is second to none. Not even Linux can give you a >70% chance that a piece of software or game you need/want from 1995 will still run (provided it's not 16bit only or needs a proprietary driver lmao) on a modern version of the OS

    Months ago I wanted to run a lot of my old childhood games (mostly between 94 and 2001 release dates) for my own kids and I found most of them still installed and ran right out of the box on fully updated Win10, a lot of the rest required some fiddling with compatibility settings and the rest just didn't work because they were 16 bit only (You can still get them working natively if you install 32 bit Win10, but subjecting children to <4gb RAM is abuse) or some other weird issue so I fell back to ScummVM/DosBox for those

    [–] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    The comment you replied to says the opposite. It's a half-truth, but Linux+WINE does some backwards compatibility better than Windows.

    First, Wine doesn't have an arbitrary limitation against running 16-bit executables AFAIK

    Second, there is anecdotal evidence of some older games breaking to graphics driver updates on Windows, but running fine (or even faster!) on Linux thanks to a much more straightforward graphical stack (and the fact that DXVK is dark magic). Even something as simple as fullscreen mode support on old games can be a buggy and flickery pain in the ass, whereas on Linux the same binary will work flawlessly with any decent compositor.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I like to think of it like a defense mechanism. By ensuring old abandoned software won't work, you don't have to worry about it having a major security vulnerability. Any old software that still works probably isn't abandoned.

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

    I see your point, but unfortunately, there's lots of proprietary old software that has been abandoned by the original company (Either because they went out of business or just moved on) that's still in active use and the source never released.

    There was just an article on Lemmy a few weeks ago on how multi-million dollar research facilities still have to use ancient software to run critical scientific machines. Although in that particular case they had to maintain old PCs as well because of proprietary drivers

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

    “Just run it in compatibility mode bro, it’s fine bro!!!”

    My computer screen suddenly turns 640x480, flickers 5 times, then crashes because -checks notes- my graphics drivers are too new.

    Yes this has actually happened to me. No I can’t remember with what game (I wanna say Deadly Premonition).

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 119 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    MacOS: "The world came into existence fully formed ten years ago so it would be silly to even try running software older than that."

    [–] [email protected] 42 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    10 years ago is giving Apple too much credit. They were using Intel processors then, ARM now. For now, you can still run Intel applications, but that won’t last much longer.

    More importantly, a 10 year old application is likely to use Carbon instead of Cocoa. Unless it’s an extremely simple application (i.e. hello world), it is unlikely to run.

    Then there’s the depreciation of resource forks, a new filesystem, tons and tons of extra security restrictions, etc.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 82 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Both of them:

    Program: crashes

    [–] [email protected] 67 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    weirdoldlib.so.13: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

    [–] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Googles wierdoldlib.so.13

    Comes across forum post:

    "Hey guys, I'm trying to run this ancient-ass game, and Linux says I need this thing apparently?"

    "Update: never mind, I fixed it."

    [–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    A wave of rage crashed over me at that last line. WHYYYY do they always do that?

    load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] Octopus1348 81 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    macOS: Noo we broke compatibility with 64-bit and with Intel

    [–] [email protected] 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    More like:

    Can you install this 25 year old program?

    Mac OS: LOL! Buy a new laptop!

    [–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    My company is currently working through this.

    The entire dev team has Macs. Most have Intels. Many are on M1. Some are on M2.

    Security/IT teams feel the pain, dealing with all sorts of weird things. And their solution lately is saying "fuck it" and giving the dev a M2. Which is a bandaid as what if M3 and onwards continues to break something?

    Fortunately, my team builds software and runs everything through docker.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Mac: can you install this 10 year old program: no.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

    Me: can you run this cool game I found

    Mac: no

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Or simply just: Too old version not supporting latest macos version.

    THEY BREAK SHIT WHEN THEY RELEASE A NEW MACOS HOLY FUCK.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 79 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    A lot of windows UI is 30 years old

    [–] [email protected] 62 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    Pretty sure Windows has more legacy components than Linux just because no nerds are updating it in their free time

    [–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

    Windows has a lot of legacy components, because there's this Fortune 500 corporation which still depends on it in 2023. Say what you want about Windows, but its backwards compatibility is unmatched. Windows also had 32-bit x86 CPU support until Windows 10, meaning that it could still run some 16-bit Windows 3.0 apps.

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago

    Always jarring when you open a folder dialog, and an unresizeable chunk of Windows 3.1 suddenly appears.

    I know it's still in the ODBC settings, probably other places too.

    [–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    No, literally. 11 still has some pre-XP dialog boxes. The framework they were written in obviously too (+at least 11 more).

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    And there will be a riot if they try to change it

    [–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    There already was one... Does anyone remember Windows 8?

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    it wouldn't be so bad if the change wasn't objectively worse

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 44 points 11 months ago

    Applies to both, some parts of windows havent been updated since forever

    [–] [email protected] 36 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Did everyone forget Chad is a caricature?

    [–] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    It's just another rage comic character

    [–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago
    [–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

    That's just not true in windows case

    [–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago

    Just because it installed, doesn’t mean it doesn’t run.

    Or doesn’t come with 50x “are you sure” prompts

    [–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

    Plenty of old apps still run fine. I've got VB6 apps I wrote in the mid 2000s that still run. A previous employer has DLLs from 1999 still running in production on Windows Server - VB6 COM components with hundreds of thousands of lines of code in total. I'm reasonably sure than Office 2000 still works, too.

    You do sometimes have to change the compatibility settings and run the apps as administrator (since they were designed for Windows 9x which didn't have separate admin permissions) but often they work.

    Even some 16-bit apps work fine as long as you use a 32-bit version of Windows (Windows 10 or older; 11 dropped the 32-bit build). The 64-bit versions of Windows don't have the NTVDM component that's required to run 16-bit Windows and DOS apps. It's an optional component on 32-bit Windows and you need to manually install it.

    A lot of effort is put in to backwards compatibility in Windows - Raymond Chen has blogs and books about it.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

    Drivers are definitely out. Some games are really iffy. Especially from the Win 9x era, where they'd do stupid things like look for a 9 in the version string of Windows, or get the amount of RAM as a 32 bit signed int, so refuses to install if you have 4GB RAM or more.

    We had a lot of dodgy old DOS programs that were fine under Win98, but XP broke them.

    [–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    The joke is that the 25y old Linux software is still maintained.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Anakin: "I'm going to install this 25 year old game"

    Padme (smiling): "Install and run it, right?"

    Anakin: smirk

    Padme (frowning): "Install and run it, right?"

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Unix: the version of the OS that built it is still supported (solaris 10 may have a 22-year support window, and counting).

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Can you open this 25 year old document? Windows: Why would I want to do that? Linux: Of course!

    [–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    More like:

    Windows Of Course! You can even save it in the new format because the one you were using is pretty dated and insecure.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    Windows: Can you run 25 year old binaries? Yes you can.

    Linux: Can you build 25 year old software from source? Yes you can.

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Which package manager would you like to use today ?
    > _

    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

    Arch: wtf? Remove that bloat immediately and check for updates

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Windows can't even install its own old products! I remember back when I had to upgrade systems from XP to 7 and the users needed IE8 in able to use some internal websites. Microsoft was like "Fuck you, you can only use IE9 or above" there was literally no way to download IE8.

    I also hate it when they only make shit available through the Windows Store or another convoluted process. No more downloading a simple EXE or MSI and double clicking it!

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I hired into a community college IT dept ~2000. Manager told me they were a Windows shop. Ha np. I proceeded to replace 3/4 of their server room with Linux. email, cd servers, file servers, web servers, db2, PeopleSoft(gack!). I was working on a cs degree which they paid for about half

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›