27

RV's are superior to houses. They are cheap, mobile and easier to maintain. What are your toughts?

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago

Depends on what you mean by traditional housing. I, for one, hope to live in a place that's very dense, far more so than RVs could ever be. Mixed-use skyscrapers are far more environmentally-friendly (per person, of course), much cheaper (tiny energy costs, because your insulation is your neighbor's entire home; tiny transportation costs, because everything is within walking distance), and much more convenient.

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)
  • Cheap - mortgage level, not cash. They’re damn expensive. It’s a depreciating asset.
  • Mobile - only if fuel is dirt cheap. You’re limited in where you can drive by their lack of maneuverability and severely limited in parking by laws and convention.
  • Easy to maintain - no building codes mean no consistency, so you’re guessing all the time, and the build quality on these things is pretty awful. There’s no space to work, and it’s go the added pain in the ass of a whole truck to maintain too. And a generator. Built to last for perhaps 10 years, but with no provisions for renewal - a house roof with shingles lasts 25-50 years and is easily replaced. An RV roof lasts 10 years before sealing starts to give out if not less and needs structural disassembly to repair in many cases.

At the end of the day you’re cooking on a pull out camp stove and shitting in the bucket hidden under the couch. It’s no life for me.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 hours ago

A friend of mine worked as a welder at an RV/camper/trailer manufacturer and he said he'd never buy one. They only cared about quantity. Most of the welds weren't much more than tack welds.

[-] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago

Yeah its like space data centers. The idea is cool but there are problems we just can't solve, physics gets in the way.

[-] sobchak@programming.dev 8 points 7 hours ago

They are cheaper to buy, but the quality and durability of everything makes them expensive. Things wear out or break fast. Everything is sealed with shitty sealant that is prone to cracking and leaking, and needs to be resealed every 3-5 years. If there is a leak, the moisture stays trapped and starts rotting out everything. The roofs are covered with a thin membrane that breaks down from the elements and UV, and can get holes ripped in it from twigs. Fuel to travel is expensive. RV parks are somewhat expensive. Poor insulation and inefficient HVAC. Heating and cooking (and water heating and sometimes refrigeration) with small propane tanks is inconvenient and somewhat expensive. Some full time RVers find it costs more than before they started doing RV full time.

There are good quality RVs that mitigate some of these issues (Airstreams and Class A), but they cost as much as houses in some areas in the US.

[-] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 9 hours ago

Yea, its cool and convenient until you get t-boned in an intersection and become not only car-less, but homeless, and all your shit is broken.

[-] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 21 points 9 hours ago

I'm not sure I have heard anyone say RVs are easy to maintain before!

In the situation you are describing is the RV parked somewhere, or moving place-to-place? What is being done with the waste? How is water obtained?

[-] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 9 points 8 hours ago

Are there like anarchist RV squats / living spaces in other parts of the world? Atleast in Germany and some other european countries they are a decently common way of self organized living:

image of køpi wagenplatz in Berlin. Sadly was evicted a few years ago

[-] BigTurkeyLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 hours ago

I'm planning on building a solar yacht and country hopping and having a mostly sovereign life, like this guy.

https://youtu.be/7KB-q7ehzM0

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 1 points 1 hour ago

sometimes, it's hard to tell irony online
storm out the ocean capsize

[-] fireweed@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

Three words: generator noise pollution

[-] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 1 points 41 minutes ago

You can handle all day if you live in somewhere that doesn't need HVAC every night with those camper battery thingy and solar panels.

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

Mobile living has its issues. From having a mailing address to a long list of repairs or maintenance issues that will require you to find space to deal with. Pets can be difficult, kids are a logistic problem with no end. Also, your home will never increase in value, while costing as much as a mortgage.

[-] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Lots of people in my generation getting mortgages. That's a sensible comparison.

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Counterpoint: Is the USA-style quarter-acre single family property really "traditional housing"? Seems more a symptom of the US brand of colonialist propaganda ("Manifest destiny") to me. It's a simulacra of a farmstead, and not really traditional at all.

Anyway I actually disagree about RVs. For what they get you, RVs are not cheap. 100sqft or so of claustrophobia. And not necessarily easy to maintain. And because they are motor vehicles, they have an expected useful lifespan that is probably below an order of magnitude shorter than your typical single family stick build. Essentially they're land yachts.

Damn I'm still editing my typos, I'm not even done writing the comment, and someone already downvoted me. I got haters.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 10 hours ago

i agree that you have an opinion.. but im not goin past that.

good luck!

[-] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 hours ago

I couldnt find anywhere better to post this, pls dont bite me.

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 1 points 1 hour ago
[-] kip@piefed.zip 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

it doesn't apply to everyone but i think a very common need that people have is to feel settled. it may manifest in different ways from having some deep connection to the land to just wanting not to worry about moving again (and again). RV, caravan, houseboat type living will suit many but ultimately relies on other owners of facilities to provide parking, charging, waste disposal etc. it's fun and cheap and adventurous but for many or most can't be forever

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I agree, but if you have kids or a lot of pets can be an issue. Also a lot of states are raging war against rv and not easy to find places to park them.

Edit: this comes from family own RV parks. You would be shocked how the cities and counties fight these parks being available. At the same time making it illegal to park one in a residential neighborhoods.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 hours ago

In the US the only systematic avenue to entering the middle class is owning land. Not the fault of RVs, I just live in a dystopia.

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
27 points (96.6% liked)

Anarchism

3075 readers
107 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.


Other anarchist comms


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS