25
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] galacticworm@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

‘..While the national minimum wage covers a very small proportion of the workforce, about 21 per cent of all employees in Australia are paid at a minimum award rate, amounting to almost 2.8 million people’

That’s a lot higher than I thought it would be. I wouldn’t say 1 in 5 workers earning minimum wage is ‘a very small proportion’

[-] Tau@aussie.zone 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The minimum award rate is a different category to the minimum wage, and most lower paid jobs fall under one award or another. It's basically the same outcome but that distinction is why they're saying the national minimum wage covers a very small proportion.

[-] tryagain@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

Actually awesome. I feel like Labor has gone full "fuck it we ball" because the opposition is going to shriek no matter what they do

[-] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago

The government doesn't determine the amount of the annual wage review. An independent panel of the Fair Work Commission does.

[-] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yes, but it bears noting that the "independent" FWC presidents are appointed by the government of the day.

It's why under the Liberals they reduced Sunday penalty rates to Saturday rates for hospo workers.

It's not independent, really, and it's kinda annoying that they keep hyping it up to be.

It's pretty shoddy as a regulator, considering my award literally says (paraphrased) "refer to section 62 of the act" under what counts as a reasonable request for overtime.

And so, we all work "reasonable hours of overtime" every single week.

Like, THAT WAS YOUR JOB FWC, ffs.

Labor put through a pretty milquetoast bill (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates Bill 2025) that will fix this eventually, but it only kicks in whenever the FWC get around to updating your award (which is on a 3 year cycle, I believe).

Kinda annoying, because they cited the "independent" nature of the FWC when justifying their approach, and they could have just legislated it pretty easily.

That, and thanks to Labor and the Accords, it has the power to rule your strike illegal.

Anyway, thanks for reading my rant - the FWC is only sort of independent.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 16 hours ago

It's not independent, really, and it's kinda annoying that they keep hyping it up to be.

similarly the RBA and a plethora of other QANGO's.

this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
25 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

5015 readers
184 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS