117
Self defence, ha, who comes up with dumbass headlines? Maybe this way it doesn't count as a breach of the non-cease fire that's been going on?
I guess my liberal teachers were completely wrong when they told me that a cease fire meant both sides stopped fighting.
They literally speak in the language of domestic abusers
Its called Newspeak, and it's the official language of Oceania.
We don’t speak like that in Oceania.
It’s doubleplus good!
International abusers technically
but the military was “using restraint during the ongoing ceasefire,”
I don't think that word means what you think it means....
Right?!
And, to think, this morning I was reading headlines about how close the US and Iran were to a deal to end the war.
Also I appreciate that the AP took a quote from Capt. Hawkins but did not ask him if he realizes how absurd what he just said actually is.
Really, really sick of this flippy floppy shit.
And such a great deal it was going to be too, just tremendous!
morning I was reading headlines about how close the US and Iran were to a deal to end the war.
The Trumpet needed to sell some stock. Now we are back to the buying phase.
The level of blatant double think and newspeak used by this administration is absolutely astounding.
US military says it carried out ‘self-defense’ strikes in Iran, including on missile
The strikes were done “to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces,” but the military was “using restraint during the ongoing ceasefire,”
Journalist should A. Ask members of the administration and military for their definitions on words or B. Just provide definitions in the article itself since A is likely to result in some wishy washy cowardly answer.
“Sir, please define self-defence in context of US attacking Iran? Please define what a CEASEFIRE is.”
Let’s be honest, this all just a distraction to play for time while Israel mounts further operations into neighbouring states. Either sign a declaration that justifies military action against you if you retaliate against future incursion by Israel or we’ll keep attacking you at the expense of the global economy. How the US population/judiciary is just sitting back while it’s government and military siphons their wallet and collapses worldwide supply chains while continually attacking mid-negotiations with “self-defence” attacks is beyond comprehension. All orchestrated by a paedo-in-chief that continually “jokes” about staying in office after his term ends.
They genuinely believe it should only count if it's an actual war crime
Clearly, the attack was a preemptive strike to defend the troops that will be attacked when the ceasefire ends without the US leaving. Or maybe the US assumes because it and its allies in the region have no problem violating ceasefires that Iran also has no problem violating this ceasefire.
Low bar America, that's Israel's classic line.
We're supposed to way "Epic Warmonger Offensive Strike 2: The Storm for Freedom Oil".
Back in my day we'd proudly announce a war as "foreign intervention to protect freedom" and not a "pre-emptive defensive strike"
smh my face, take me back to the good ol' days of the Bushs' invading Iraq.
Trump had to molest those children, in self defense
Give it time and analysis of stock trading during this period might explain the talking up of peace deals followed by sudden military strikes.
Billionaires are self-defending. Poor victims
In defense of Trump's fragile ego, because Iran isn't giving in.
this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
117 points (96.1% liked)
World News
56326 readers
2509 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS