181
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

UK media has been barred from disclosing it until now.

How had it not been 'leaked' to foreign media and reported on? It is nothing short of disgusting that the government can act with such impunity when they decide to do something that they are fully aware would generate harsh criticism.

Nothing that the government do or decide upon should be banned from the media, with the exception of where it may affect children in a negative way.

The whole reason that they are in their positions are because people who trusted them gave them their vote. It absolutely flies a massive "fuck you" in the face of that.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago

It was. Zarah Sultana even raised the issue using parliamentary privilege a couple of weeks ago. Sadly not enough people noticed.

[-] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 day ago

It was. I've known about this for weeks, so any anglophone journalist probably has as well. They don't want to report on it.

[-] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

It's being done because otherwise there's no way for the government to reimprison them, which makes them look weak on terrorism after the furore they've already created about PA. They've already spent two years in prison pretrial, which counts triple towards a future prison sentence if they're found guilty. None of them can actually be put away for more than 6 years even if they're found guilty, so unless the government finds a way to increase the sentencing every single activist will walk free from court regardless of the result.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 days ago

Who are they supposed to have been terrorising? On whom did they inflict terror?

[-] rimu@piefed.social 16 points 2 days ago

the judge ruled that there appeared to be a ‘terrorist connection’ as the activists were attempting to influence the Israeli government by restricting its access to weapons.

This is suuuch a stretch.

They are terrorist because they tried to restrict access to tools of terror.

Imagine vegetarians being accused of animal cruelty because they tried to convince people not to eat animals.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

It's just not terrorism, by any normal understanding of that word. It doesn't inflict any terror on anyone, either intentionally or unintentionally, nor does it even attempt to inflict terror.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 days ago
[-] Avicenna@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

hahah more or less yeah. Feels like everything is shaped around how much something terrorises shareholders.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

The judge, in fact the whole process was obviously biased against the defendents. How exactly is this a fair trial? The whole thing stinks to the high heavens.

[-] Lowleekun@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

It is really vindicating in a sickening way that the West does not care much about pretending to be free any longer. More and more people take a second look and realize it was only ever so free as long as you were aligned. And it not smart to be aligned with the bourgies if you are a prole.

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 33 points 2 days ago

Eroding the legitimacy of the courts doesn’t seem like an excellent strategy right now

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 2 days ago

What legitimacy?

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

What the fuck? Starmer must have known about this, never mind about harbouring Mandelson again.

but, didn't the courts declared that arresting them. qas groundless and illegal, and were all released after a year in jail. then they kept arresting them again?

Rule of Law my ass.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

https://www.npr.org/2026/02/13/nx-s1-5713346/britain-court-palestine-action-ban

The ban on Palestine action was illegal. they released over 500 protesters, some spent over a year in jail.

And now they are arresting them again for the same reason. and those who were released are facing a second trial again for the same charges.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

You’re confusing two different things. The people in this article stood trial over an incident in Wilton where a building was broken into, property damaged and a police officer severely assaulted. There were two linked trials, and in February one of them resulted in a jury unable to come to a verdict on certain of the charges. The CPS elected to retry the defendants on those charges, and that’s the verdict just in.

You’re confusing that with the unlawful (not illegal) proscription of Palestine Action, which resulted in many arrests of non-violent protestors. There is an appeal pending on the status of the proscription.

sorry, it's just so hard to keep up with all that bullshit.

[-] brewery@feddit.uk 11 points 2 days ago

I guess we should also be thinking, how many people have been convicted since 9/11 under these secret courts. Yes, most were probably actual terrorists but it would be certain that many innocent people were convicted if you can't try them in courts designed to mitigate that (jury + beyond resolvable doubt or whatever the term is)

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago

Yes, most were probably actual terrorists

doubt

[-] Andy_R@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

The whole system is corrupted.

[-] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

The system is behaving as intended, and as it always has. The suffragettes were treated just as harshly.

[-] jasoman@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

USA following suit soon in their own way.

[-] zeroConnection@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is more like the USA is leading the way, and the UK is taking an example.

this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
181 points (98.9% liked)

United Kingdom

6695 readers
368 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS