I'm surprised he didn't call her woke and say he was happy she had died, like he usually does with everyone who has ever done anything good in their lives.
Maybe I've just been lucky, but in many years of renting I have never seen someone advertise one rent, then raise it before you close the deal.
I'm genuinely not sure what he meant. I've read the whole post and it's about investments from Saudi Arabia.
Iran has a right to defend itself from the US, but don't forget that Iran's regime is evil. Did you forget the protest massacres from only last year?
The Iranian people deserve freedom from both US intervention AND their tyranical government.
The Financial Times was particularly quick to come after Foran. It quoted her June post reading:
Glory to the Iranian resistance, whose courageous fight against the imperialist dogs of the USA has utterly humiliated the Great Satan.
Yeah, this is why I voted for her opponent. I don't like the US, but the little I do know about Iran's regime is pretty terrible too.
That post was her pinned one, and it reads a little tankie / extreme left. I don't follow her, so I don't know if that's an accurate representation of her politics. On the face of it, it made me feel a little uncomfortable.
In the end it was a narrow win. 6 more votes than her opponent.

Why does this guy write his post like Trump?
I can kind of relate. There are a lot of parts of coding I find a little boring.
- Once the interesting problem is solved and all you need to do is follow through
- Large scale refactorings in ways too complicated for an IDE.
- Fixing annoying dependency / migration issues
When you use an expensive AI agent, like Claude, it can nowadays handle these tasks competently, to the point where I only need to correct small things here and there.
When you give these tasks to an AI agent, it feels a bit like delegating to a junior, but without the guilt of giving someone a menial or boring task. That allows me to work on stuff I find more interesting. To me, THAT'S why it's adictive.
However, this isn't without cost. First, there's the societal costs: Environmental, centralization of power, contribution to hardware shortages and a bubble
Second, there are more personal costs. You'll come to rely more and more on these tools, and your skills will rust. You may end up avoiding learning things about a codebase because you delegate it away.
It's a tempting tool. One which in my experience can genuinely help, but is easy to misuse.
I guess my point is for the problems it causes its probably not worth doing, balancing the two?
Making websites that no one needs to visit but poison or trap AI scrappers would likely be a better way to fight back.
TLDR; It fucks up accessibility for blind people (amongst others).
Its also pretty futile imo. AI is reading billions of words from books and posts. A handful of users obfuscating their posts is not going to do anything.
What's that bottom panel crossed shape one?
- Negotiate,
- threaten,
- negotiate,
- threaten,
- negotiate,
- threaten, <-- you are here
- negotiate,
- threaten, ...
Cutting disability support causes misery and homelessness, which is way more expensive to the state than just giving the person money.
Temporary accommodation slumlords take a huge cut, and the mental health hit of making people homeless prevents them from getting a job for up to a year or two after the change, also costing them extra in therapy etc.
All of this isn't theoretical. It has happened to several people I know.
Cutting welfare always costs more than spending on it. You are a moron if you thing that trying to scrounge pennies from the disadvantaged makes sense.