[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

This is a tough one.

Protesting the actions of a synagoge should be legal and protests are most effective outside the organisation itself. At the same time harassment based on identity needs to be prevented.

IMO that law should not exist. Anti-discrimination laws are enough of a tool that you don't need this sort of legislation.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Most cis women who are against trans women being in "their" bathrooms are either hardcore bigots or trenders. Trans women have been using womens bathrooms for decades and it's only recently people started to care.

Cis women shouldn't want bathroom policing because they could be harassed too for not looking womanly enough. Trans exclusion therefore often overlaps with mysogyny and racism.

Banning trans people from bathrooms often bans them from all but disabled / gender neutral bathrooms. A trans man can neither go to the mens nor the womens. This means many trans people will not be able to go out comfortably, and mah not be able to get jobs where those bathrooms are not available. Because of this, bathroom bans are a disproportionate action that violates humans rights and discrimination laws.

We all know this is an absurd moral panic and the fact things have gotten this far is a national embarassment.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

GO VOTE... if it's on in your area. In my area it's not until next year.

23
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Basically, they're all horrible people, to no ones surprise. And these are the ones who have not been recently arrested for being Russian shills

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yd878ejqko

Maybe this will be the thing that finally gets your weirdo uncle to reconsider voting reform.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The key difference in the above statement is that transmission and distribution will be nationalised, but not all generation.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

I don't know what you were expecting.

You more or less have to have an account to use a paid feature. Especially for a free trial.

It's only Mulvad (which is apparently what Firefox uses under the hood) who doesn't use an email address as an identifier.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

The misogyny and racism party are full of racists and misogynists?! Color me surprised.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

Is this a Jaws (1975) meme?

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Yeah I had to go and check because it seemed so absurd, petty and full of lies. I shouldn't be too surprised though. That is how I'd characterize the whole presidency.

It just makes Trump seem like a frothing at the mouth loser who has drunk his own koolaid

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nobody is "all" anything. But many if not most would agree with Zack and the rest are going to have to prove that their perceived fear of Palestine marches trumps the freedom of speech of others and the lives at stake in Palestine.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

I've never heard of this guy. This the only thing I could find that seemed to give context here.

During the race, far-right accounts claiming to be Stancil supporters harassed his opponents, who obliquely criticized his use of social media.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I think I'll put this here

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Having tried AV1, I found that it was worse than h265 for what I use it for: high quality movie encodes.

It doesn't preserve grain well, and if struggles with maintaining quality in low light scenes.

On top of all of this it tends to be more CPU intensive than h265.

For this testing, I used Handbrakes CPU encoder.

I realise that this is maybe not what AV1 is intended for. It's probably best suited to making low bitrate streams more tolerable. Maybe AV2 will be better 🤷

25
32
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

Not sure if this qualifies for this community, but given Lemmy is the primary source of news for many I thought it was important enough news to share.

This is a developing story, and it's not even clear yet that Trump was the target.

29
14
97
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Alt text: Picture of E.T. laying back on a Sinclair C5

25

To the surprise of no one at this point, Kier Starmer's Labour prepares to squeeze more money out of poor people. Anything to not tax billionaires.

The (Forced) Labour party seem to earnestly believe that disabled people are just too lazy to work, and cutting their benefits will incentivise them to do so. In reality, what will happen is that most will sink into deeper poverty and many will become homeless. Homeless people are a lot more expensive to the state than people on benefits, and their health will only deteriorate, causing them to be even less likely to work and costing more to the NHS.

82
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

EDIT: Changed the article from Guardian to Independent as it was a more complete, less odd article without a cookiewall.


The numbers are still unconfirmed, but having been there I can tell you it was massive and fantastic.

The police estimates of 50 000 are comically false. The truth is likely somewhere in the middle. Most likely in the multiple hundreds of thousands.

Either way, it dwarfs any of the half a dozen protests I've seen in London over the last year, and some of those were really big.

242
submitted 1 month ago by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

To be completely precise, some she reverse engineers herself, others she finds an implementation someone has already done and just creates a UI for them. Still very cool.

In the video, she then describes how she did it, tools and all.

It's a shame people in the US (and possibly UK?) would be putting themselves at legal risk if they did the same. See Louis Rossman's videos on the DMCA if you are curious.

35
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

The news first came in 2024, but it's been very quiet since.

I've been waiting this whole time to jettison WhatsApp from my phone.

Is it available only in some parts of the world? If so can I spoof it?

We know that adversarial interoperability works, so why have we not been able to make this work?

All else failing, are there any unofficial WhatsApp clients I can use to preserve my privacy?

20

Sorry for the YouTube link, I realise Lemmy doesn't like that format much.

This is a video trying to explain the bathshit crazy views of Pete Hegseth, the GOP and the rest of its Christian Nationalist followers.

Not to excuse them, but to help understand what they will do next and what their goals are. As to many of us, myself included, it sometimes seems like random chaos.

48
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

This is a follow-up to banning puberty blockers for children under 16 in 2023, pausing or cancelling all trials recently, and the banning of trans people from gendered bathrooms this year.

It's a progressive attack on trans rights, where evidence of the safety and benefits of trans healthcare is ignored and decisions is taken out of the hands of trans people, trans children and their parents. They're treated as people unable to make decisions for themselves. A tactic often used against women, disabled people and black people historically.

In this particular case, it's still breaking news but I've heard the way they fit the data to their desired result was to make the filters on what was to be accepted as evidence extremely narrow. Things like "all subjects in the study must have never taken puberty blockers, but must be on hormones and born male". When they find that no study exactly matches their criteria, they throw up their hands and say "we just don't know if it's safe" and ban all healthcare.

It doesn't matter how many experts criticise these choices and peer-review the reports. We've been shown by the Cass Review (still referenced in these decisions, despite its provably terrible quality) that all evidence outside the transphobic agenda will be ignored and every possible side-effect of treatment will be used as justification to eradicate trans people.

view more: next ›

Armand1

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago