[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

John Carpenter's The Thing (1982)

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah as a result of this post I decided to look into AV1 grain synthesis again. That's the only way I can see that AV1 can meaningfully "improve" over h265 right now for noisy content like movies, which is what enthusiasts care about.

Grain synthesis is where you analyze noise on the original file, denoise the video stream and reapply artificial noise of a similar style as the original at decode time.

It relies on a lot of assumptions:

  • The denoise doesn't kill your quality
  • The grain synthesis looks convincingly like real film grain.
  • decoding devices will support rendering the grain

From a short experiment, I found that VLC was able to render the synthetic grain, but MPV(.net) did not out of the box. I had to play around with gpu rendering modes to get it to work.

As for transcoding, it's unclear what happens to the synthetic grain, whether it is burnt in or simply ignored. At least one or two people have reported it will just be ignored and you'll get a weirdly smooth movie.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Typical end users do not. Companies do because it will save them money.

Enthusiasts will care because it could save them storage space for equivalent quality, though if the cost of encoding is so high then just in terms of energy costs you may save money just going for a cheaper codec and upgrading storage with the saved money.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I guess that means people can go and run the reference code and start comparing the results for real now.

Hopefully an adaptation will get added to FFMPEG and Handbrake so we can have a play with it too.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

It's unacceptable, but I guarantee that the Right (Reform, Conservatives and Labour Leadership) will lap it up. Say that it brings such "clarity" as they have been saying since the Supreme Court Judgement.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

She is fine, don't worry 🙂

314
The largest of yawns (thelemmy.club)
submitted 4 days ago by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/cat@lemmy.world

It's warm and she's comfy on the pavement.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Yeah as I said these are the plastic ones, not dissolvable. Those starch ones are fairly neat.

18
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world

In this day and age, why are we still using these horrible packing peanuts? These aren't even the dissolvable ones.

The plastic packing peanuts filling half a large box

The cherry on the cake? This is the side of the box.

Box with "I am made of 100% recycled content" on it

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Isn't that a violation of church-state split? Or does that not apply to schools in the US?

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

To save you all some time, this is the poll.

4

I assume the rest of their councillors are just smart enough to keep their mouths shut.

The post as screenshots if you dont want to go to YouTube. Appologies to any blind users as I don't have time to OCR these right now:

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Don't care. JP Morgan can fuck off.

Also I'm pretty sure that that's an empty threat, like millionaires saying they'll leave.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That's why we're cutting disability benefits

- Conservatives, (Forced) Labour

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 84 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)
33

While this is a high-profile case, this is pretty emblematic of Conservative and Forced Labour policy. Labour have cut back even further on what constitutes a disability, when in reality many hundreds of thousands of people who should receive PIP do not.

If a state cannot provide comfortable lives for disabled people and, even worse, stigmatises them as scroungers, it is a failed state.

27
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Chart of seats up for election and how many were gained and lost by party.

As the remaining council votes start slowing down, we see that the greatest growth and numbers go to Reform council members, but the Green Party have gained significant ground.

Meanwhile, Labour have lost over half of the seats up for election this May.

23
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Basically, they're all horrible people, to no ones surprise. And these are the ones who have not been recently arrested for being Russian shills

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yd878ejqko

Maybe this will be the thing that finally gets your weirdo uncle to reconsider voting reform.

25
32
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

Not sure if this qualifies for this community, but given Lemmy is the primary source of news for many I thought it was important enough news to share.

This is a developing story, and it's not even clear yet that Trump was the target.

29
14
97
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Alt text: Picture of E.T. laying back on a Sinclair C5

25

To the surprise of no one at this point, Kier Starmer's Labour prepares to squeeze more money out of poor people. Anything to not tax billionaires.

The (Forced) Labour party seem to earnestly believe that disabled people are just too lazy to work, and cutting their benefits will incentivise them to do so. In reality, what will happen is that most will sink into deeper poverty and many will become homeless. Homeless people are a lot more expensive to the state than people on benefits, and their health will only deteriorate, causing them to be even less likely to work and costing more to the NHS.

view more: next ›

Armand1

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago