[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 1 points 13 seconds ago

Frankly, this treatment is repulsive. All presumably to seek tough on crime, we take people's rights away and expose them to inhumane treatment.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “The public rightly expect to be protected from sex offenders and this individual has already been deported.

Office has declined to say how much it has cost to remove Omar, a conservative estimate suggests a bill to the UK taxpayer of hundreds of thousands of pounds.

Was it worth it?

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

Open AI has done this too. It's literally just a marketing play. "We made something so scary and amazing. Pay attention to us".

In reality it's probably a nothing burger.

If you actually put forward a law to ban all AI development now they'd lobby against it.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago

"antibiotique"

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 30 points 21 hours ago
[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

The Telegraph is tripe. Not worth wiping your ass with (if we still had print media).

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

That's exactly what the right want.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

John Carpenter's The Thing (1982)

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Typical end users do not. Companies do because it will save them money.

Enthusiasts will care because it could save them storage space for equivalent quality, though if the cost of encoding is so high then just in terms of energy costs you may save money just going for a cheaper codec and upgrading storage with the saved money.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I guess that means people can go and run the reference code and start comparing the results for real now.

Hopefully an adaptation will get added to FFMPEG and Handbrake so we can have a play with it too.

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

It's unacceptable, but I guarantee that the Right (Reform, Conservatives and Labour Leadership) will lap it up. Say that it brings such "clarity" as they have been saying since the Supreme Court Judgement.

317
The largest of yawns (thelemmy.club)
submitted 1 week ago by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/cat@lemmy.world

It's warm and she's comfy on the pavement.

18
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world

In this day and age, why are we still using these horrible packing peanuts? These aren't even the dissolvable ones.

The plastic packing peanuts filling half a large box

The cherry on the cake? This is the side of the box.

Box with "I am made of 100% recycled content" on it

4

I assume the rest of their councillors are just smart enough to keep their mouths shut.

The post as screenshots if you dont want to go to YouTube. Appologies to any blind users as I don't have time to OCR these right now:

33

While this is a high-profile case, this is pretty emblematic of Conservative and Forced Labour policy. Labour have cut back even further on what constitutes a disability, when in reality many hundreds of thousands of people who should receive PIP do not.

If a state cannot provide comfortable lives for disabled people and, even worse, stigmatises them as scroungers, it is a failed state.

27
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Chart of seats up for election and how many were gained and lost by party.

As the remaining council votes start slowing down, we see that the greatest growth and numbers go to Reform council members, but the Green Party have gained significant ground.

Meanwhile, Labour have lost over half of the seats up for election this May.

23
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Basically, they're all horrible people, to no ones surprise. And these are the ones who have not been recently arrested for being Russian shills

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yd878ejqko

Maybe this will be the thing that finally gets your weirdo uncle to reconsider voting reform.

25
32
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

Not sure if this qualifies for this community, but given Lemmy is the primary source of news for many I thought it was important enough news to share.

This is a developing story, and it's not even clear yet that Trump was the target.

29
14
97
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Alt text: Picture of E.T. laying back on a Sinclair C5

25

To the surprise of no one at this point, Kier Starmer's Labour prepares to squeeze more money out of poor people. Anything to not tax billionaires.

The (Forced) Labour party seem to earnestly believe that disabled people are just too lazy to work, and cutting their benefits will incentivise them to do so. In reality, what will happen is that most will sink into deeper poverty and many will become homeless. Homeless people are a lot more expensive to the state than people on benefits, and their health will only deteriorate, causing them to be even less likely to work and costing more to the NHS.

view more: next ›

Armand1

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago