437

Increasingly, Meta has been using debt to fuel its spending, amassing $59 billion in long-term debt on its balance sheet by the end of 2025, double the prior year’s total. And that doesn’t count the “aggressive” accounting it has used to keep the cost of a $27 billion Louisiana data center off its books. “The spending growth looks increasingly unsustainable,” The Wall Street Journal’s “Heard on the Street” columnist Asa Fitch wrote this week.

Now, as the company careens from one staggeringly expensive misadventure to another, its cash-cow core business is starting to wear out. Last quarter, the number of daily active users across its properties declined for the first time to 3.56 billion from 3.58 billion.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

First they'll collapse slowly, then all at once. The debt is catching up to them, they'll start laying off even more people, and they'll try to increase revenue by running more ads, and charging more for the ads, etc.

If you think they, or any of them, including our own government, are "too big to fail", well, it's happened before.

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago

I don't understand why businesses don't predict this downward spiral. I recall a city with crap bus infrastructure saying ridership was down so they had to increase fares. So then a while later, oh ridership is lower again, let's increase fares. Duh, its down because the routes suck and you've increased the barrier to choosing to use it. SMH

[-] DeathByDenim@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

Oh, hey, they are doing that in my city right now. It's a classic!

[-] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

Smaller businesses or privately owned businesses with a smart owner do.

Large publicly traded companies are sustained by a perception that an investment in or loan to that company will pay off in a higher dollar amount in the future, so if the perception becomes the company is shrinking then the investments and loans slow down which makes the perception worse, you get that feedback loop which turns into the death spiral.

So the bigwigs at the top of these companies have to be professional liars and gamblers to change the perception and make it look like everything isn't just fine, they're doing great! The line must go up.

[-] Burninator05@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I believe what you've described is intentional with any service that someone is looking to cut. Step one: this service sucks and doesn't deserve as much funding as it has. Step two: cut funding. Step three: see step one.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago

"Starve the beast"

[-] realitista@lemmus.org 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I would love it if this were true, but as a member of the mag seven, they get a huge majority of the investible income of the world by default. Passive investing is 55% of the overall investing that happens now, and that means sending money to zuck more or less regardless of what he does or doesn't do. It's very hard to fuck that up. Not impossible, but they will be handed a lot of money for a long time. They will have to really fuck up badly to really die.

[-] plz1@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

OpenAI has entered the chat

[-] canniest_tod@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

Is "dying" the right word? They're struggling, but I won't be surprised if this administration or the next bails Meta out, since fb and insta are essentially public services for a lot of people, as much as I hate that. The smart thing for the fed government to do is to nationalize Meta's platforms.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 18 points 5 hours ago

They're not public services. They're hostile psy-ops around the world, helping destabilise other governments.

It's high time other countries just outright blocked that cesspool, and Twitter while they're at it.

[-] FunStuffIsFun@eviltoast.org 1 points 2 hours ago

"other governments"

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Right, so "public services", as the filthy rich would sarcastically put it. Facebook is one of the major set of chains that bind, and direct us, none of them want to lose that.

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Problem is, it's been overrun by rage bait for clicks and vocal extremists.

It's weird watching people think their opinion is popular because a handful of people are shouting it everywhere on Facebook.

It's no longer fun, and there is no way to force only posts by people you know. So all the racist garbage gets lots of engagement and is also added to your feed

[-] Yliaster@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago

3.58 to 3.56 billion isn't really significant because in the long term these sort of mega corporations can easily recover that many users.

But I like they're getting covered in debt, though idk how far it is from collapse as these numbers don't make much sense to me.

[-] CumbrianCucumber@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

Honestly, I think it's massively significant. For a start off, that's 20 million people, the population of Chile, in one quarter. That's a lot of people regardless of how you slice it.

But more to the point, Meta services - Facebook especially - have reached a point of cultural impact where anyone who doesn't have them can't be talked into getting them anyway. Plus, they're useful messaging services too, because everyone else uses them. Their popularity has become self-fulfilling. The idea of Meta losing more users than it's gaining at all has been frankly unthinkable until recently.

[-] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Might be boomers dying off, and young people won't use Facebook because it's not cool to have an account there?

[-] queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

the pessimism in me suspects they’ll just get a cushy bailout from the government later. SOCIALIST CAPITALISM - when the government only cares about corporations and not people

[-] Yliaster@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

That's just capitalism. But yeah, they can just bailout since the concept of separate legal entities means that individual investors aren't held responsible for corporate losses.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 40 points 12 hours ago

When you speak of billions and trillions it's all meaningless bullshit and everything has gotten too far out of hand.

[-] etherphon@piefed.world 15 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, it's wild. I think these numbers are really literally making people into obsessive power hoarders like smaug. All this time and humanity has not yet learned it's not a great idea for any one person to have amassed such wealth and power.

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 28 points 13 hours ago

That’s about 3 billion people too many.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 49 points 15 hours ago

Company: grows 5% in a year instead of predicted 5.5%

Corporate media: It's dead.

[-] dgriffith@aussie.zone 41 points 16 hours ago

How

the FUCK

can a single datacentre cost

TWENTY SEVEN BILLION

dollars?

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 43 points 14 hours ago

Well, you have the actual, physical cost of the datacenter -- the land, the design, the engineers, the permits, the environmental studies, the lawyers, the construction, etc -- and then you have the cost of removing roadblocks along the way. Especially in Louisiana, if you're not familiar with Huey Long: he's been gone for many decades, but his way of doing business down there hasn't changed a bit.

It's exactly like the East Wing ballroom: there's a private fund that Trump opened specifically for businessmen to contribute that will fund the ballroom construction, which has been open and taking donations since he tore the East Wing down, and there's also the bill before Congress, right now, that will have the ballroom paid for by tax dollars, all of it.

"But," you may ask, and rightly so, "why are private contributions needed to fund a ballroom that will be funded entirely by taxes?" and the answer to that is, "Yes."

One of the sure signs you're in a banana republic is that every palm must be greased on the way to getting legal consent for anything, no matter how small. The US is now no different.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Funny how you use the term "banana republic" to mean "corruption that wasn't in the US" when the situation that coined the term was created by American imperialism in the first place.

Edit: not disagreeing with you btw, just found that specific use of words ironic, given the background.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

No, you're quite right. To be fair, from slavery to robber barons, I don't think we have ever been free of corruption. But now we're speedrunning into the level of corruption of having to bring extra cash for the bribes when renewing a drivers license.

[-] Stiggyman@ani.social 15 points 15 hours ago
[-] frightful5680@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Gimme the money I'm going on a world home building and feeding tour. I'm mansa musa 2.0

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 13 points 14 hours ago

This is a nytimes article about meta reaching lemmy all frontpage. It's up to you whatever meta dies or not, stop upvoting their shit.

[-] arsCynic@piefed.social 27 points 17 hours ago

Not dying fast enough. A list of good reasons to quit social media: https://www.arscyni.cc/file/quit_facebook.html.

[-] Lanske@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago

Left Meta (incl whatsapp) more then a year ago. Haven't missed it for a bit. Quite liberating actually, especially leaving whatsapp was great

[-] xylogx@lemmy.world 79 points 22 hours ago

Bullshit:

Meta reported for its most recent quarter (Q1 2026, ended March 31, 2026):

  • Revenue: $56.3 billion
  • Net income (profit): $26.8 billion

That was up from:

  • $42.3 billion revenue a year earlier
  • $16.6 billion net income a year earlier
[-] tgf@lemmy.world 53 points 21 hours ago

When an aging business starts to take on water, the quickest, easiest — and most destructive — solution is to make moves that will generate more money now but may cost the company later. And that’s exactly what Meta has started to do. In the first three months of this year, the company started cramming more ads onto its platforms while charging advertisers more. Those choices may have allowed the company to increase its revenue per user by a significant 27 percent in the first quarter of 2026, but they are also likely to further alienate users (and annoy advertisers).

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 23 points 18 hours ago

There's only about eight billion humans in existence. 3.56B daily active users is as close to saturated as you can get.

[-] excral@feddit.org 4 points 11 hours ago

Is Meta even active in China or are they blocked by the CCP? If so you can remove 1.4 billion people from the list of potential users, meaning an even crazier market saturation

[-] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 17 hours ago

Don't forget that a lot of them are bots

[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 87 points 22 hours ago

I've been spending a whole lot less time on Facebook recently, I've deleted the app off my phone, and just check in once a day or so on my computer.

They just don't seem to grasp that I want to see what my friends and family are doing, not meme pages.

[-] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 109 points 22 hours ago

it's not that they "don't grasp" what you want, it's that they couldn't care less what you want

the way i was able to eventually delete my account was to sit down and delete everything i'd ever posted, every photo, every comment, etc. makes it easier to just say YES i want to remove this bullshit from my life altogether

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Janx@piefed.social 23 points 19 hours ago

Like the billionaires currently ruining the world: please die faster.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
437 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

84478 readers
3676 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS