86

He instructed the governmental oversight committee to study the implications of adding to Texas “one or more contiguous counties of New Mexico” and the process to do so, after welcoming a proposal out of New Mexico to allow its counties to band together and secede. While the Texas-New Mexico boundary is unlikely to shift next year, the proposal will likely appeal to pro-secessionists in Texas, some of whom are among Burrows’ conservative skeptics.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So tired of nut jobs and grifters. So very very tired.

[-] Soulphite@reddthat.com 33 points 3 days ago

This is what happens when a lawless multi-convicted felon and rapist, suspected (but definitely) pedophile, racist piece of shit is in charge. It emboldens the rest of them to do absolutely stupid shit to their country and state.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

" A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man. "

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Too bad, Lincoln's post-Civil-War supreme court preemptively torpedoed this one. It's been ruled that you need permission from the rest of the union to secede and can't do it unilaterally, even through the union was formed in the first place via unilaterally seceding from the British empire.

...Because that makes sense.

Anyhoo, even if these dingbats succeed according to their own metrics the federal government won't let them go. So have fun with that. Not that I trust any of said dingbats to have actually studied any history on the matter whatsoever, or on any other matter while we're at it.

[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

This is about a New Mexico county's secession to become apart of Texas, not secession from the US.

[-] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

Conservatives know secession from the country is illegal so their politicians find a slightly greyer area - states seceding to other states - to start planting the seed into their base's heads. They then cultivate the plant as vigorously as possible and by the time someone looks up the law, it's too late - the idea has been thoroughly rooted. This is one of their most time-honored strategies.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago

Then Houston joins California and out comes the surprised Pikachu.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I'm positive that's verboten as well. The constitution is quite clear that this requires the approval of Congress.

[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Yes, which i assume will be the finding of whoever was assigned to layout the process

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

No, they would be apart from the US, but joined with Texas.

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

They aren’t going anywhere. As a part of the USA it’s blood in / blood out.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

For a while now I have been hearing a lot of quiet and not-so-quiet talk about people fed up with the One Star State and leaving Texas, or at least working toward that goal. There are a lot of great people there, as in every state, and I don't want to bash the ones trying to make it better, but for some the pros are strongly outweighed by the cons.

It's hot and expensive and corrupt and has a governor who brings to mind that tired old poem An Ode to a Tree every time I have to hear about some other anti-human act of cruelty he's pushing forward, and a lieutenant governor who said grandparents should be willing to die of covid to save the economy for their children.

And then there's all the anti-immigrant, anti-women, anti-healthcare, anti-LGBTQ+, anti-DEI, anti-voting, anti-democracy, pro-hate, pro-culture war, pro-pseudo-religious horseshit they're up to, including praying for the death of an actual Christian candidate because he's telling people there's actually a difference between real Christianity and this twisted political version they're pushing.

Oh, and Texas gets hurricanes AND twisters too, forgot about that. And Ted "Cancun" Cruz, but never at the same time: that's his Superman power. You'll never see him in Texas at the same time as a natural disaster or destructive weather. I could think of more, but that's Texas right now, most of it having to do with its own insanely corrupt governance. New Mexico has problems too, but not like Texas.

So I already know this is a scam. No one in their right mind is running toward Texas. No one.

Has anyone asked New Mexico what they think of this plan, or is that buried with the Epstein files now?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Has anyone asked New Mexico what they think of this plan, or is that buried with the Epstein files now?

Funny you should mention the two in the same breath...

New Investigation Launched into Epstein's 7,600-Acre Zorro Ranch. Here's What We Know

[-] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

They probably just want Eddy County because of the Navajo Refinery that refines a bunch of the oil out of west Texas.

Fuck off, we should go back to being Mexico first.

[-] fireweed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

This will never happen for the simple reason that Texas's outline is too damn iconic.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Ha! Failed due to branding.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Having read the article, I like the notion of some counties being able to redraw state lines with some limitations. There’s parts of states that feel like parts of other states and letting local folks choose their government was kind of the point.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

No. U-haul is a thing for this very reason.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I don’t even like imaginary lines in the dirt to begin with so you’re gonna have to make a better argument than U Haul

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

State boundaries make sense in that if there were none everyone would be represented by a single entity. They have to exist at some level for that reason.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Okay but why do states exist in the first place.

Also: Consent of the governed

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

For the same reason that countries exist. Everyone should have the right for representation. The US is a big place. It needs to be broken into individual locations so that citizens are better locally represented. Whether or not the seemingly arbitrary lines make sense is a different debate, but have some level of boundaries should exist due to the size of this country.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

“Lines in the dirt exist because we imagine they’re there”

Still not convinced.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

You haven't provided any counter. I've told you why they should exist. You've said they shouldn't with no reason. What is your better solution that will be better and why?

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Prove to me the imaginary lines in the dirt exist first and then I’ll counter it.

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
86 points (97.8% liked)

politics

29120 readers
2720 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS