💀

I know Temu uses that slogan. Are they owned by the same people? Would make sense, if so.

Billionaires rape real children.

and it finally makes sense, because I don't think the average billionaire spends money on garbage as much as their average customer

Exactly. Same with faux bait stuff. I personally think it's gross so I don't consume it, but if everyone is a consenting adult and it stops people from consuming real CSAM I can't really support banning it.

But the problem many people have with stuff like that is they assume the people consuming it will go on to do it to real people, which is the same argument they tried to use against violent video games.

It's a moral panic - pure and simple. The same reason some countries want to ban cartoon/animated pictures where the fictional character looks too young. I guess the underlying assumption there is that it'll increase the number of people offending towards real children but I don't think there's any evidence to back that up.

If it was up to me, the criteria would be whether an actual person is being hurt directly or as a consequence of. That would include real violence, real pictures and possibly also GenAI stuff if it's trained on real content.

I believe the last time something like this came up, the argument was raised that it normalizes the behavior and leads to escalation, i.e. “they’re just illustrations” “it’s just a doll” to “I’m just taking photos” or “it’s just touching”, this time against actual victims

They are making these legislations to steer people's focus away from the real CSA.

Remember. CSAM is just the symptom. CSA being the actual cause.

I read the entire article looking for this and couldn't find anything and I'm so confused. Did they mean to say "Selling weapons and sex dolls resembling children"?

Or are we literally talking about Desert Eagle Fleshlights?

Edit: I just realized that "Selling weapons and sex dolls resembling children" is equally as confusing. The weapons resemble children? A Glock 9mm-year-old