176
submitted 4 days ago by zabadoh@ani.social to c/coffee@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] M137@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Clicked the link, it said "you've got 10% off!" and asked for my email, sure that's fine, then asked for my phone number with this:

By providing your number and clicking the button, you agree to receive recurring auto-dialed marketing SMS (including cart reminders; AI content; artificial or prerecorded voices) and our Terms of Service (including arbitration).

Nope, fuck you.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Keep scrolling, you didn't even get to the anal probing part yet.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago
[-] zabadoh@ani.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The tenth cooking cycle (after 20 hours), resulted in an average of 88 μg of (nickel) Ni and 86 μg of (chromium) Cr leached per 126 g serving of tomato sauce.

#1 If you're cooking tomato sauce for 20 hours, you're doing it wrong.

Adults in the U.S. are estimated to ingest an average of 69 to 162 μg of Ni per day

The average daily intake of chromium in the US population has been estimated at 76 μg while the US FDA recommended daily intake is 120 μg Cr

#2 Even after cooking tomato sauce for 20 hours, the leached amounts were within the daily average intake or recommended daily intake for both nickel and chromium.

[-] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Trials included three types of stainless steels and a stainless steel saucepan; cooking times of 2 to 20 hours

Thats a bit longer than I usually brew my coffee! I use a glass French press though.

[-] WandowsVista@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

having a choice between this and microplastics is what makes capitalism so great!

[-] catalyst@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Big aeropress, glass aeropress, now metal aeropress! What’s next? Gotta diversify that product line for maximum profits!

(Disclaimer: long time plastic aeropress user here. 😊)

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 38 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"Pre-order ships in May"

An eye watering $169, but hey it's finally here.

Slightly cheaper than the $199 stupidly breakable glass Premium.

Slightly larger 12oz capacity vs 10oz Aeropress original, but smaller than the 20oz XL

[-] vext01@feddit.uk 29 points 4 days ago

Thats silly money.

The charm of the AP is that it's cheap and you can just lob it in your camping bag.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

As much as I would like to set it on the floor and step on it for “ghettospresso,” that price is ridiculous.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Aeropress was never anything like expresso. it just makes a fast cup easily, and the best part is the way the puck pops out into the trash and there is minimal clean up and no pod waste.

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 27 points 4 days ago

$170 (assuming USD). And their cookie prompt is broken, forcing you to accept their trackerware.

[-] UnPassive@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Where's my V60 gang? We take the aeropress camping, but I like the simplicity of the V60 at home

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

Well now we won't have microplastics to add body to our brews.

[-] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

AH man it's a shame I gave up coffee two years ago cuz of shitty acid reflux!

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Now you can aeropress that acid back where it belongs!

[-] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

This makes so much more sense than that ridiculous glass version.

I'm guessing that Aeropress has lost a ton of market share to the Oxo Rapid Brewer (which appears to be superior to the Aeropress in everyway). Aeropress is now scrambling with any and all ideas to try to recall market share.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 days ago

I'd love to have one of these, but I can't do it at that price. I'll just keep getting microplastics in me, I suppose..

[-] Town@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago

There are better options available for under $170 USD.

[-] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 11 points 4 days ago

I am open to suggestions!

[-] lime@feddit.nu 15 points 4 days ago

man, the preheating you'll have to do with this...

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I was thinking about that too, but I have a stainless steel vacuum insulated french press, and I never preheat it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I exclusively use the plastic aeropress (3 years or so) and although upgrading to something stainless seems like a nice upgrade I'd want to revisit best brewing methods and make that decision again before spending $150+. I don't drink coffee every week let alone every month, typically doing week long streaks before taking a break, so this is cool to see but nothing that makes me rush out and upgrade.

There seems to be some haters in the comments for the aeropress, I guess I'd like to know better alternatives for quickly brewing black coffee for one person.

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

French press? Or a freestanding thingy that you put a coffee filter in with a cup underneath for a one cup drip coffee.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zabadoh@ani.social 2 points 3 days ago

If you have a source of brew-temperature water handy, such as a water boiler, there's the quick cuccumella method, which is pretty much drip coffee: Fill the coffee filter of the cuccumella with grounds, fill the water container with hot water, invert the cuccumella, and it drips through in a couple of minutes.

It makes a nice tasting brew: More flavor than an aeropress, but not quite as strong as a moka pot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] snailstone@piefed.social 11 points 4 days ago

How do I use the numbers on the outside?

[-] vext01@feddit.uk 10 points 4 days ago

They address this in the FAQ:

The number markings are a recognizable part of the AeroPress design and, by including them on Steel, we're protecting our trademark. To help with fill guidance, the inside of the chamber includes a laser-etched mark at the 5 level that can be seen from above.

"Protecting trademark"

[-] catalyst@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Ok this is really funny. 😂

[-] Etnaphele@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Wow that’s the stupidest thing I’ve read in a while. Also very American (no offense intended)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Philharmonic3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The company that took over Aeropress is out of touch to say the least. It's a shame they fucked up the product. I really like my old plastic one. Fuck the corpo shit stains who are only motivated by profit.

[-] FreeBeard@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 days ago

Do people think that the Aeropress is the ultimate coffee maker? Because if not, why pay the premium? I have one as well and I love it for the 20€ it costs me. For 170€ you could get a decent filter machine. Do people not Google for alternatives?

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago

It's all just personal preference, but yes, many people do think it's the best way to brew coffee. Some people think it gives you microplastics, but it can't be substantial. If it were substantial you'd see your aeropress wearing away. Washing after your done should keep the amount low, if it were measurable at all.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
176 points (95.4% liked)

Coffee

10568 readers
1 users here now

☕ - The hot beverage that powers the world!

Coffee gadgets - It's always great to learn about new gadgets. Please share your favorite hardware or full setups. It might inspire newcomers to experiment!

Local businesses - Please promote your local businesses. If you are not the owner of the business you are promoting, kindly ask the owner if it's okay. It would be great if the business has a physical store to include an exterior or interior shot.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS