49

This was the first movie made by Quentin Tarantino that I watched. I didn't know anything about the movie, apart from a handful of references I observed from memes.

The story was undoubtedly different from other movies yet in a way still entertaining. However I am unbeknownst to what the actual plot of this movie was supposed to be nor what was special about it to be considered so popular. Does the fact that it deviates from traditional storytelling in itself act as a selling point?

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago

Really good movie quotes were the real-life memes before the memes were memes.

Every scene in this movie has at least one quote that you could say in mixed company and others in-the-know would catch the reference.

If you disagree with me, I will get medieval on your ass.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 15 hours ago

When someone asks me if I am okay:

[-] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

Memes are literally older than the internet.

[-] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Right.

Really good movie quotes were the real-life memes before the memes were memes.

Movies before internet, no?

If you disagree with me, I will get medieval on your ass.

Time to get a pair of pliers and a blow torch....

[-] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago
[-] IWW4@lemmy.zip 23 points 23 hours ago
  • Great Dialogue
  • Great Characters
  • Parts were hilarious
  • Parts were intense and thrilling
  • Scenes where fun as hell
  • It is highly entertaining
[-] rossman@lemmy.zip 3 points 15 hours ago

Timing of a well written exploitation film. It sets pretty solid expectations and the payoffs are worth it with an eccentric cast of characters.

[-] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 44 points 1 day ago

As you already found out, the storytelling is very special.

The way of showing of violence was new.

The very weird behaviour of most characters was special.

The nonstandard ending (without a clear morale or meaning) was very special, at least for a Hollywood movie.

[-] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

The dialogues were also special: characters were mostly talking about mundane subjects but in a unique and very entertaining way. Who else can make a Hollywood movie scene with John Travolta telling that the most interesting thing about a foreign country where they speak a foreign language is that they use different words for fast food menu items. It was unexpected and hilarious at the time.

[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 day ago

The dialog also indicated class - this is straight pulp fiction/noir stuff.

Tarantino understood how to re-imagine noir for a 90's audience.

[-] Sergio@piefed.social 27 points 1 day ago

The very weird behaviour of most characters was special.

Yes, to expand on this: each of the characters had enough "story" to make a movie of their own, and there were a lot of characters. But it was paced well enough that it didn't get overwhelming.

Also the casting was very well done. At the time Travolta was a bit of a has-been, and Samuel L Jackson was getting supporting roles but wasn't as iconic as he is now.

The movie was very influential, so a lot of the innovations it made have been copied, so it seems more "normal" now.

[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I haven't seen it mentioned, but the title alone tells us so much about what to expect.

"Pulp Fiction" is a type of novel published on the cheapest paper available, marginally better than newsprint - pulp paper.

These were novels that were published cheaply and quickly - so we're not talking about the novel of the century, but simple entertainment - fast paced, stylized, sensational.

All that also connects to the Noir genre of novels - gritty, dirty, dangerous, hard characters for whom killing is easy. The heyday of Noir is about 1920-1950 and includes authors like Dashiel Hammet (Maltese Falcon) and HP Lovecraft.

I'm sure Tarantino read many of these kinds of novels growing up - you can see the influence: Pulp Fiction is a 90's take on the Noir genre.

All that said, I haven't seen it in years. I don't find it compelling enough to watch again. That's not a criticism in any way - I saw it in the theatre when it came out and laughed my ass off at parts. We talked about it for days afterward, trying to understand it.

[-] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 6 points 21 hours ago

I watched it late in life, after supposing that I was immune to hype surrounding movies. The story telling quirks definitely add to its mystique but I think even if it weren't for that it would still be strong.

The characters are likeable even when they're being reprehensible, the writing shuns grandiose ideas to celebrate mundane (except for maybe Jules, depends on how much you celebrate hobo-spiritual awakenings), and also it's often ugly. It provokes and makes you feel things vicariously above all other morals or values. Which is kind the purpose of the book genre it's named after.

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago

My take is that it was very successful because it combined 'art movie' with grind house action.

Mixing up the time line, the long monologue about the watch, the general conversations, those were all things you'd expect in a art film. The violence was pure Roger Corman/Times Square.

Think of Queen and 'Bohemian Rhapsody.' Nobody had combined high opera and rock-and-roll like that before [afaik]

You might want to look up a novel titled "Red Harvest" by Dashiell Hammett.

It's been a template for almost a century. Hard core action and meditations on violence and corruption.

[-] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

Say "what" one more time!

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

You have to roll back the clock to having seen Reservoir Dogs first which is also an excellent movie.

Pulp Fiction did what Reservoir Dogs did, but put it in a more commercial wrapper, meaning more people would watch and enjoy it.

I remember watching the Zed scene the first time and flashing back to this scene:

https://youtu.be/PGqB6JIUzBo

And thinking "Oh, holy hell, here we go!"

But as it turned out, the Zed scene wasn't anywhere near as... visceral... as the scene from Reservoir Dogs.

[-] DeadPixel@lemmy.zip 5 points 21 hours ago

Zed's dead, baby. Zed's dead.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 12 points 1 day ago

I think it's how it is a b-movie that is actually good that makes it and other Tarantino movies so compelling. It is low budget fluff (or well, pulp) done on a high budget with more thought put into it than is incidentally apparent.

This question reminded me of how the Swedish movie Slim Susie put it. It begins in a movie theatre where they're watching Pulp Fiction but the movie stops at the half way point because the theatre had only gotten the first film roll. To placate the audience the theatre owner phones his buddy to ask how Pulp Fiction ends: John Travolta dies, but at least the black guy survives.

Slim Susie Trailer

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 15 hours ago

Thanks for sharing! That movie looks very entertaining.

[-] MantisToboggon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago
[-] daggermoon@piefed.world 3 points 1 day ago

Ah, a man of culture.

[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 2 points 22 hours ago

Sam Jackson and nothing else

[-] ace_garp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is considered by some, as the first ever Drum & Bass track, the first with a two-step beat.

8]

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
49 points (94.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38352 readers
1979 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS