top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 34 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (20 children)

Copper is actually ~25-250X leas efficient at transferring heat than a heat pipe and convection is hundreds of times more efficient than radiation at transferring heat and the fins on a heat sink would have hundreds of times more surface area for dissipating heat all that is to say this might work but it would be orders of magnitude less efficient than a standard heat sink.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 34 points 7 months ago (45 children)

    Looks nice. Why they don't sell PCs with cooling like that? What are the downsides?

  • source
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [–] 95 points 7 months ago (13 children)

    I would guess that the low surface area would lead to problems. At first it would cool very well because of the huge thermal mass, but once it reaches thermal equilibrium the cooling would be quite weak.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] [S] 66 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I'd also think moving your PC will rip your CPU right off the motherboard

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 43 points 7 months ago (13 children)

    Do you have any idea how expensive a solid block of copper that big is?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    I have a micro ATX case that itself is the cooler. Heatpipes transport the heat to the case walls and they have fins to increase surface area. It can handle up to 65 watt CPUs.

    It's not produced anymore. But with all the talk of the Gabecube I've been itching to make a new build with it. Unfortunately I have neither the money or the energy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    Weight, cost, and it's probably not effective for the long haul. The mass of a copper ingot like that will work like a heatsink, but it has a very low surface area for the energy it can absorb. So it'll heat up to a point that is uncomfortable for the CPU, then fail to radiate that energy out to the air effectively.

    As a test-bench temporary heatsink, this is actually kind of inspired. No fans, to fussy clips, just stack a copper brick on the CPU, run some benchmarks, and then turn it all off.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Incredibly unwieldy. Real quick estimate of volume puts that at around 1.75kg of copper, so it wouldn't be possible to mount in a vertical PC case orientation (ie the majority of consumer PC cases) without significant (expensive) modifications to both the mobo socket mount and the case, else its weight would snap the motherboard, or just slowly flex it until traces failed.

    It may not even be able to be used vertically like that for very long or it will compress and damage the CPU / socket / mobo. Just as an example, the weight limit of the thermal solution (HSF/water chamber heatsink/etc) for socket LGA 1700 is 950g.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    My guess is that will only work until it saturates with heat. Some liquid cooling setups are also like that, where the rad isn't capable of dissipating heat fast enough to prevent the whole thing from overheating, but it'll work fine for a while because the loop itself can absorb a bunch of heat before it stops being able to take any more. Then they probably blame the chip maker for running too hot even with liquid cooling when their liquid cooling setup is actually less effective than the stock cooler or their case has horrible airflow and would choke any size or number of rads. But their reservoir acts as a heat buffer, so it takes 30 mins to even realize that, but they've already concluded it works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 7 months ago
    [–] 18 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    I hear this is what the inside of those flock cameras contain.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago

    This is a lot easier than running a line out to the swimming pool.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjO6OLmZB9A

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Am I blind? What's that card in the PCIE slot?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Why is the motherboard resting on a towel??

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    They don't want to scratch up their desk with the solder joints on the back of it? I'd normally use cardboard, but a towel probably works too 🤷

    Or maybe it just has muddy paws that need toweling off 😜

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (11 children)

    Why copper? Aluminum works way better as a dissipation surface.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    Copper has more mass, heat capacity, and thermal conductivity per litre.

    Is aluminium actually more effective as a dissipation surface? I hadn't heard that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Copper is better conductor but it's worse at dissipation. Do the experience yourself, heat a block of each and then touch them afterwards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Is that not because the copper holds more heat, so stays hot for longer at the same dissipation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    Maybe you're right, but I remember than in the 2000s I've had identical cpu heatsinks in both copper/aluminum versions, and the aluminum one had better performance. And then they started to make hybrid ones, stating that the copper part was to allow rapid heat transference and the aluminum parts to improve dissipation. But maybe it was all marketing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    Technically, copper is better at heat dissipation. Aluminum is prefered because it's cheaper and lighter. For an aluminum heat sink, you could have an smaller equally performing copper heat sink. In fact, this is the case for when weight and cost isn't a priority. Some heatsinks even use a copper core to wick away heat to the rest of the aluminum heat sink.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›